| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (65)

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:19PM Rentaro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Interesting. Treasure at spot 50
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love treasure, but have they ever had a financially successful game past WarioWorld? Or is my head up my butt?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:44PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We all know it isn't going to be Sin & Punishment 2, that's for sure.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 8:18AM ArthurSA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Iz it shmup tiem now pleez?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:19PM Joeybeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When are we gonna see Ready At Dawn's new project?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:25PM Giggman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I figured Guerilla would be there. Or are the one of the SCE devs.

AAA list though
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:26PM Giggman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I also might not know what the hell I'm talking about......
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:53PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
guerilla is under SCEE, but not the SCE studios listed.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell, Naughty Dog was 27th last year, and this year they aren't even mentioned?....
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:32PM StormEagle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's only because they don't spew out games every 3 months like most of the other developers on this list. Nevermind the fact the Uncharted is an amazing game. There's a lot of mistakes on this list.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
uh,

"This is a detailed supplement to this month's Top 50 Developers countdown in Game Developer magazine, which saw over 600 industry professionals from Game Developer magazine and Gamasutra.com surveyed regarding their opinions on more than 150 developers, as well as allowing them to rate any relevant experiences with working with the companies in question"

As you can see, games release do influence the results, but they are not solemnly based on them, hence why I find it shocking for Naughty Dog to not even be mentioned.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:46PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"This data was used along with sales chart data for the calendar year 2008, number of SKUs from January through December 2008, and average review scores from Metacritic (with the exception of those titles not covered by Metacritic), to determine company rankings. "


The data must be weighted heavily toward recent activity. I mean, if the number of SKUs and sales, as well as Metacritic rating for those SKUs, are part of the calculation it would be tough to make the list if you released 0 SKUs during that year. IMO, Naughty Dog is better than most on that list, but they are certainly not very prolific so it's easy to understand why they wouldn't be there this time.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:46PM rockies123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lets just assume the list is compiled based on the games released for the past 12 months or so (since it's an annual list). If you dont release anything new, then you're not on the list. That doesn't mean Naughty Dog is not good though, coz uncharted was awesome! :D
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 7:11AM xxxsam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so is it ironic that the Uncharted developer is uncharted?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:33PM KingBroly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So why is Konami at 6 while Kojima is 37th? Pretty sure those should at least be switched. And Sega's only 37th because Sonic Unleashed was bad. If they didn't release it, they would've been higher with just Valkyria Chronicles.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Castlevania and Winning Eleven?...
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:48PM rockies123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe because kojima prod. didnt release games as frequently as konami itself? just my opinion though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:35PM StormEagle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
33. TOSE wiki their resume and explain to me how they're even on this list much less beating anyone behind them?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:39PM StormEagle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. I seriously doubt the game sold THAT well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Starfy motherfuckers, get familiar
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:38PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
TOSE does like everything for everybody, if I'm not mistaken. They're basically coders, but they've done a lot of games.

It probably sucks ass to work there, though, seeing as they apparently have such a merc like mentality when it comes to business.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:48PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, TOSE are basically the unsung heroes of the gaming world. Only recently have they started to get credit for their work.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 7:50PM Greg0fTheDead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
KOEI 4 LIFEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:39PM Professor Lario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I approve of Atlus, but where is my Team ICO?

Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:45PM cuteSAVAGE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They haven't had a game published since 2005 (this covers 2008). Also, I'm guessing they'd be covered under SCE Japan Studio and not get their own spot.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Has Team Ico had a successful game? ICO did awful, and Shadow of The Collosus was a sleeper hit at best. Hopefully, Sony can Market The Last Guardian well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
5th Cell?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:50PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why would they be on this list?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:51PM snarfoogle said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You can be a top 10 developer for ruining COD?

Who knew.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:51PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
treyarch before bethesda, insomniac, and kojima? i guess that's where sales come in, right? don't get me wrong, i love me some nazi zombies with friends, but damn that's a high position.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:09PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
especially for changing almost NOTHING
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:31PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
guns, time period, settings, characters, stories, gun effects (explosions, shotguns and MGs rip apart body parts), nazi zombies, a new multiplayer mode...

seems like a good number of changes to me. just because they used the same engine doesn't mean "they barely changed anything". yeah, the WWII era is tired, yeah COD4 is better, but no, world at war is not a mediocre game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:54PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
didnt say it was mediocre. said they didnt change almost anything.
Guns: same classes, same attachments, same type of leveling, same
Story was nothing ground breaking and CoD4 had better story telling
characters were no better than CoD4(which werent awesome either. good but nothing too special)
the gun effects in CoD1 were as good as the ones in W@W
the gore was an improvement as was the zombies
game modes were a nice change
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:57PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Co-op too.

Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:51PM Typicalgamer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
how the hell did koei beat konami.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
giant robots
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sempre visito o blog daqui do Brasil, sempre que possível levo as notícias até o povo "Brazuka" e seria uma honra ter um dia a visita em meu blog de jogos de algum dos escritores deste brilhante blog, muito sucesso!

______________________________________________

http://www.tecnojogos.com.br
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
começ da OU dos inglês do fale o um foda para para o também do A., blogue do seu do sobre dos cuidados do ninguém
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:08PM Petebot330 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I told you I don't speak Spanish! English please.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:49PM rockies123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
fail. lol
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:49PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But that's portuguese, not spanish.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah Portuguese, the old South American language of love...
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:01PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
top 50 devs of 2009 are not about games that are from 2009. they are games from sometime in 2008 through sometime in 2009. its the reason IW was number 2 in 08. its the reason treyarch is 10 in 09.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:10PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, after reading your guys' comments, seeing that this list is somehow more about 2008 than 2009, and that we're only halfway through 2009, and the company in the second spot hasn't released anything this year (so far), this list pretty much means nothing, right?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:57PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you go to the link you'll see that they used sales and review data for games released in calendar year 2008. Wrath of the Lich King was released in 2008.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 2:13PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's exactly my point.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:20PM kornkid8600 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Treyarch is garbage.
They came out with two games, one proving they can't make games for crap. Quantum of Solace was a disgrace. On the other hand they come out with WAW, a relatively good game, with the guidance and assistance of IW, in order to keep their originally created franchise name in good standing due to previous mishaps by Treyarch, the garbage producing company. If one company doesn't deserve any recognition for their gaming development its Treyarch. They aren't worth jack, never made a good game on their own. QoS is proof that today they still cannot.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:55PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol they had 3 games. spider man web of shadows was last year to
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I completely agree.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW