Call of Duty: World at War Map Pack 2 sells one million first weekend
by David Hinkle 
on Jun 18th 2009 3:57PM
68
Reader Comments (68)
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:25PM dhermz said
the new maps are beast
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:25PM (Unverified) said
OMG this game is really making money... Hope that will be like this for Modern Warfare 2 !
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:26PM dhermz said
cnt wait for MW2
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:50PM baby sea tuna said
Compared to Crystal Skull, Raiders was a fucking WWII documentary!
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:10PM Misfit Toy said
The zombie map is HUGE.
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:14PM yo Naturale said
That's what I thought... *everyone* like Raiders of the Lost Ark. That film somehow injected mysticism in a historical setting and it was okay with everyone, yet for W@W it's a check in the negative column. Or maybe it was the execution of the game you had a problem with..?
Speaking of executions... WWII and its era has so many terrible actions associated with it, from *all* sides involved, that it needs little help with "exploitations" or "besmirching."
Speaking of executions... WWII and its era has so many terrible actions associated with it, from *all* sides involved, that it needs little help with "exploitations" or "besmirching."
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:18PM yo Naturale said
This comment was made out of thread and was intended to be line with the comments following baby sea tuna's comment (though not in response to BST) up above.
Thanks. Move along now. Nothing to see here.
Reply
Thanks. Move along now. Nothing to see here.
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:53PM (Unverified) said
Like I said in that thread, World at War is a lackluster game that retains insufficient originality.
Reply
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:34PM MrVee PSN Vampah said
The ONLY good thing out of the map pack is zombie mode which treyarch actualy did well, i have to be honest, im still waiting to be able to buy the stupid thing though......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmVaWEHzVTE&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmVaWEHzVTE&feature=channel_page
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:59PM yo Naturale said
Hey, you found me! I didn't even have look in a mirror and say your name five times!
*Reunited and it feels so Gooooood!*
Seriously though, exactly how does something *retain* "insufficient originality"?
*Reunited and it feels so Gooooood!*
Seriously though, exactly how does something *retain* "insufficient originality"?
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 6:27PM (Unverified) said
"Hey, you found me! I didn't even have look in a mirror and say your name five times!" Lol! I'm always lurking throughout the interwebz preying upon hearts and minds, like Rumpelstiltskin!
But seriously I'll give some elucidation, the game totally lacked originality, to put it bluntly Nazi Zombies was a rip off of Return to Castle Wolfenstein and the multiplayer lackluster cut and paste version of COD 4.
Reply
But seriously I'll give some elucidation, the game totally lacked originality, to put it bluntly Nazi Zombies was a rip off of Return to Castle Wolfenstein and the multiplayer lackluster cut and paste version of COD 4.
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 6:45PM yo Naturale said
zOMG! You found me again! This is soo cool.
We better watch out though, because in the words of Auric Goldfinger, "Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time its... Love." Well, maybe he didn't say it *all* like that, but I think it works better that way.
'Splainin (a.k.a. eluci-muh-dation) how much Treyarch is "teh suk" aside, I'd still like to know how something *retains* its "insufficient originality." Is it a tricky question, sorta like where John McClane and Zeus had to get a particular amount of water from one jug to the other?
I'm writing a thesis and I promise I'll cite you as a reference.
We better watch out though, because in the words of Auric Goldfinger, "Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time its... Love." Well, maybe he didn't say it *all* like that, but I think it works better that way.
'Splainin (a.k.a. eluci-muh-dation) how much Treyarch is "teh suk" aside, I'd still like to know how something *retains* its "insufficient originality." Is it a tricky question, sorta like where John McClane and Zeus had to get a particular amount of water from one jug to the other?
I'm writing a thesis and I promise I'll cite you as a reference.
Posted: Jun 18th 2009 7:43PM yo Naturale said
@ Viney -
That.. was excellent.
If one could only kill grammar Nazis in W@W... *sigh*. I can hear Kiefer Sutherland shouting "Shove that in your past participle!" in my head right now.
Also Good Sir.. you've managed to veer this thread right back on topic. Cheers.
That.. was excellent.
If one could only kill grammar Nazis in W@W... *sigh*. I can hear Kiefer Sutherland shouting "Shove that in your past participle!" in my head right now.
Also Good Sir.. you've managed to veer this thread right back on topic. Cheers.
Posted: Jun 19th 2009 2:38AM (Unverified) said
I bet that I don't care.
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM