| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (19)

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 2:35AM Swizzler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
mebbie in 5 years can it be open source, capcom? *doggie eyes*
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 2:37AM xGearSecondx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does the image on top rattle anyone elses mind about game development... s-so complicated... x___x;..
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 3:56AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Naw, it looks awesome! :D
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 2:56AM arrness PSN chsowls Steam dcdani said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hopefully it doesn't completely suck for ps3
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 7:22PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. Though I played through LP1 and never understood what all the complaints were.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 10:30PM arrness PSN chsowls Steam dcdani said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeahh LP1 wasn't bad at all

Fallout 3 ran worse on my PS3
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 3:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering the results it put out with RE5, this is a very good thing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 3:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's the really impressive thing... RE5 used MT1!!

LP2 is the first MT2 game I believe... and I LOVE CAPCOM!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:41AM DeepFriedSushi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i've heard reps refer to re5 using mt 1.5
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 8:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i thought RE5 used the Havok engine?

what's with the big fat "Havok" logo at the boot up of the game then?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 8:42AM Rollins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Havoc is just for physics.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 8:50AM robmv said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks like that screenshot was taken from a Unix/Linux machine, or a very weird Windows theme, hopefully it is a Linux computer :-)
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 9:49AM Arsenic13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats nice of Capcom. Unreal Engine needs to go away already. Im tired of wet looking games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 1:41PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's the studio's fault, not the Engine's.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 11:58AM anoteoftruth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm really excited about this one.. considering RE5 was on the MT1, I can only imagine what kind of awesomeness will come from the MT2. I'm so happy to see this, especially after the huge disapointment in Terminal Reality's "Infernal engine." They might as well just name it the "everything floats to the ground and glides on any surface like its weightless-bullshit engine." How can u go aruond touting a new engine when in Ghostbusters, If a door knocked down in front of me, I can push it weightlessly across the room just by walking into it? Retarded man. Can't wait to see what MT2 will bring.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 4:18PM badbob001 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So *now* can we have Megaman Legends 3?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 7:22PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PLEASE
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 7:22PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Was the first Lost Planet on MT Framework 1 then?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 10:29PM arrness PSN chsowls Steam dcdani said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeahh LP1 wasn't bad at all

Fallout 3 ran worse on my PS3
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW