| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more
PS3
XBOX
Wii
3DS
PSP
PC
Mobile
Move
Kinect

Reader Comments (183)

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 4:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good news, if true. *fingers crossed*

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 4:05PM Bravo9zero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The first L4D was dull and Repetitive for me (Bought It off Steam half price)
The game Is way too short, Only 4 weapons to chose from..

Hopefully L4D2 Is better.


Posted: Jun 21st 2009 9:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Won't be true.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 9:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I love all the PS3 fanboys trying their best to make the 360 disappear.

So it's becoming less and less relevant is it, let's see.

1. It's still outselling the PS3
2. Devs make more money on 360
3. 360 generates more revenue
4. It has better online (yes, it does)
5. It's just as powerful as the PS3
6. It still has better exclusives

I really don't see how it's becoming less relevant/dying. But if the Sony fanboys want to keep spouting forth their bullshit to make themselves feel better, go right ahead, but deep down you all know that MS is more relevant in the console market than they have ever been. If anything it's the Playstation brand that's becoming less relevant with each passing day.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 10:41AM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 12:28PM YeshuabenYosef said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. If we compare charts that put them on the same release date, no it's not.
2. 2 & 3 are basically the same thing, your using a logistical fallacy to make the list look bigger, and the 360 was released a year earlier.
4. Not really, especially if you consider the price differences.
5. No it's not
6. The 360 barely has any exclusives thanks to the PC.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 9:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Oh and just to add, did all you Sony fanboys forget the period of 1996-2005?

Makes me laugh that you come on here moaning about having to buy more than 1 console, what about people last gen who wanted games but didn't want to buy a PS2? Bet that was fine though, eh? The funny thing is Sony are the Microsoft of the console market (or at least they used to be) but no-one seemed to have a problem with it.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 11:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If we do ever get to see this game I bet its going to get delayed a gajillion times first and than come out as a choppy port :|


I got my fingers crossed that it wont tho........

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
like how tf2 in the orange box (MY FAVORITE GAME EVER!!!) is slow, laggy, and always loses connection to the server midgame. even on ethernet!!! i really hope that if valve won't develop for the ps3 (which is RIDICULOUS!) they should at least test the game from ea to keep their decency intact. its really sad when a great developer like valve lets another company ruin their game. dont they have ANY standards???
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
YES!!! YES!!! YESSSS!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 1:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Playstation has far better exclusives on the way then microsoft!

Heavy Rain, The last guardian and god of war 3 to name a few.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 1:47PM dhermz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if u click the pic twice u will go to the web site and see its not for the ps3

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 1:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I only saw it was for pc and 360 on the site. I guess they removed the ps3.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 2:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that should be a tight game. looking forward to that for ps3!! :)

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 2:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
lol, enjoy your half-assed PS3 port everybody.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really wouldn't enjoy it without having played the first.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 3:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well its not on the site anymore, must have been just a glitch.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 4:54PM Sleestak said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@relaxeder enjoy your half ass metal gear.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 6:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Just because some games are exclusive to one console doesn't mean you have to be. For the sony-only crowd, it's a much cheaper move--even with the online fee. So stop crying, buy a 360, and play ALL the great games. Multi-platform gamers never miss out on the fun.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 7:01PM Mayor West said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather play Uncharted 2 thank you anyway though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 10:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I only have a PS3, and I played most 360 exclusive on my computer. Sometimes I want a 360, but having 2 consoles just for a few games isn't worth it at all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 7:01PM Mayor West said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glad it's not coming to the PS3. This game should have been DLC or an expansion. There were only 4 levels in the original for christs sake.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 7:29PM phoenixkissme said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA has update the site, only Xbox360 and PC.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 8:50PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would be proud if Microsoft actually made a decent product...hence my lack of nationalism.

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 8:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So deep in denial......

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 10:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do the rationalizations never end?

Posted: Jun 21st 2009 11:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No matter what, they'll be called lazy anyways. Might as well take this path.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 5:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
how did this go from talking about a botched game announcement to a flame war? wow, i must be turning a blind eye to these comments instinctively now. lol

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 5:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea just checked the site again its not there any more...bummer still doesnt make sense to me why they wouldnt now im not asking any one its rethorical.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 9:09AM Gaucho85 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think I'd ever play L4D or L4D2. . . too scary for my taste... then again I said the same thing about Bioshock.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 12:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Could someone please explain to me what is going on with valve and not wanting to release this on PS3. I havent really been following this battle. Is there really this huge thing or is it valve does not know how to program for it?

Regardless of what some think of the PS3,simply put it would sell. Probally pretty well.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 12:07PM wallywallas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, i'm glad that's done with. Moving on.

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 11:42PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sadly, you are misinformed. The ps3's battery can be replaced just fine. It may be a proprietary battery, but nonetheless replaceable.

Plenty of people don't have the ps3 parked to their router, so the wifi is a convenient feature. It's not like it adds $50 to the cost of the console.

You're probably going to argue that blu-ray was unnecessary too. That's all debateable but certainly MGS4 never would've existed in its current form without blu-ray.

Live might be more mature than the PSN, but hey...at least I never have to worry about paying yearly $20-$50 just so that I can go online to play COD4.

At the end of the day, the market could really do without the 360 if it weren't for Microsoft playing the part of video game industry bully.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW