| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (39)

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Totally agree.

Now if either Nintendo or Square would do the same.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, just they release something different more than often. Ex. would be The World Ends With You.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I concur as well, but I still think his comments were a bit contrived.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:04PM 33PercentGod said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't agree with you more for Nintendo.

We've been seeing these characters since the 80's. Where are the new franchises Reggie mentioned at E3 of 2008? I want new characters to the Nintendo universe,not some Wii *insert name* garbage!

Enough milking the cow, new characters and IP's already!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 5:40AM R Kasahara said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem with both companies is that many of their fans are constantly clamoring for the next Zeldas, Final Fantasies, etc. and couldn't care less about your TWEWYs and such. I too love it when companies make new IP and wish they would do it more often, but the fact remains that they are less likely to sell than the old reliable franchises.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well Activision has Infinity Ward by the balls, so they can't....and Bungie doesn't have the balls, so they won't.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:22PM Ryuk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh I have a feeling Bungie has the balls. They'll have a new IP soon enough.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But they have Halos.

...and that's all they have...
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:35PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They'll pop up with a new Myth game out of nowhere and blow everyone's minds.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:56PM arkweld said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
and Myth wouldn't be a new IP.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:13PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no, but it's been so long since a Myth it might as well be. Personally i just wish Bungie would fucking push that Peter Jackson thing out the door already! I need that shit! Halo has a fantastic story, but strangely, the games are kinda light on it
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Them releasing a new Myth game is like Nintendo releasing a new Star Fox game: sure its new only because its been in limbo but not technically new.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:25PM GamGams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He's competing with both companies. It's a little hard to take what he's saying as genuine. It's the kind of thing he could be encouraging just to give his own IPs some breathing room. That's a bit tinfoil hat I guess. Still hard to really listen to.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:32PM FraGNeM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly, that's the first thing I thought, too.

"Hey guys, mind throwing away your established brands to put our stuff on a level playing field?"

That said, he can also be seen as touting Gearbox's newest projects as being new IPs unlike the stuff found at Bungie or IW.

Either way, it's sort of a no-brainer comment to make, given the position Gearbox is in.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe I'm naive, but I think people in the game industry generally want to see each other do well. They must know that the more quality titles that come out, the bigger they can grow the industry and prove that video games can be just as important and smart as movies.

These guys are still considered the bastard childs of the entertainment industry in the media (Just look at the news stories that were completely wrong and inaccurate about "controversial" game play in Mass Effect and GTA4).

It's the underdog mentality I bet that makes these guys root for each other to do well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ahahaha

Activision.

Original.

That'll happen.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:07PM 33PercentGod said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
COD 23: Futuristic Mars Warfare *Total Recall Edition* ?
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:11PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
idk about you but id fucking buy that
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ironically games such as those where created by a risk. That's why you take them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:37PM MarkHawk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a reasonable request. I'm not saying abandon your old titles but make new games along side them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whats with all the industry shit talk recently? All the crap racing game devs are giving each other, now this?
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To use a baseball analogy, his comments are the equivalent of telling the New York Yankees to quit buying players, and develop your farm system. I'm guessing in the case of Infinity Ward, Bungie, and the Yankees, that's not happening anytime soon! LOL!
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 6:57PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funny, given that all Gearbox did for several years was churn out expansions, ports, and rehashes. And while Brothers in Arms was an original series, it was set in well-worn territory. Not exactly inspiring.

Borderlands may be the game that finally makes Gearbox a top-tier dev. I'm hoping like hell it'll be great.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:10PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
really it's extremely hypocritical of him to say that when Halo has 5 games, CoD has 6 (not counting stuff like BR1 or Finest Hour) and Brother in Arms has fucking 11! I'd give the guy more credence as well if he could make a game that A) is good and b)isnt vaporware
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 10:50PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you look at it that way, IW has 4 by the end of this year, bungie has 5 by the end of next year. He was talking about the devs, not the series. He did not say "Treyarch, grey matter, and IW are awesome"
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:12PM velazkid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IDK Halo Reach and Halo ODST are good enough for me. I'm sure anything that Bungie makes is going to be top notch anyways, same for InfWard. But seriously Infward needs to move on. They are whoring CoD games way too much.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 10:52PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Halo #4 and #5 are good enough for me but IW's CoD #4 is whoring the games now. Why did you buy W@W? and if u didn't then u havent been playing a new cod game for a year and a half. even if you did buy W@W, the multiplayer felt like a mod, not a new game
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes. Please making the shooters everyone plays so that someone will buy mine. K, thanks.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 7:55PM Toop said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think it is important to note that Gearbox also did Half-Life: Opposing Force which was totally awesome.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 9:08PM ChomskyKnows said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy better get his ass to work on Borderlands and make damn sure it isn't as mediocre as Hell's Highway was...

They can make Halo and CoD as long as they want as far as I'm concerned...as long as the games are good. And they have been so far...
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 9:37PM HeavyToka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Somebody tell that to the creators of Dynasty Warriors rofl
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 10:04PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Originality! Exactly...like in the "Band of Brothers" game you make...I mean "Brothers in Arms"! :p
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 10:47PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
call of duty was not really a risk. the did a MoH game which was part of a franchise so all they had to do was make a game similar but better and market it as such and they had a winner. Even in 03 Activision was big enough to push their game. As for Bungie, all they had to do was let MS's money go to work. I personally would like to see a new IW IP come out in 2011 when it wont have to compete with Halo Reach
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2009 11:10PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dark Wayne

Dude I totally agree with you! Where is the Peter Jackson/Halo project??!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 6:16AM Mr Pie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, yeah... ehr... Do this guy know almost ALL his studio is known by are their brothers in arms game and sequels ?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 11:21AM Johnny Neat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like he wants them to leave those franchises so him and his lot can get a job filling for them. No thanks. I'd rather a Dev make games they are good at them take a rick for no reason and fail. Plus after their brothers' in Arms BS hype, they can suck it. That game was not good overall.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 11:24AM Johnny Neat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like he wants them to leave those franchises so him and his lot can get a job filling for them. No thanks. I'd rather a Dev make games they are good at than take a risk for no reason and fail. Plus after their brothers' in Arms BS hype, they can suck it. That game was not good overall.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 2:43PM velazkid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry gunrunna but your point was completely missed by me. What are you trying to say? Can you clarify?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2009 4:55PM warmonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what a douchebag! If he had brands with the same selling power, you can bet that's all Gearbox would be making. F'n DOUCHE!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW