| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (168)

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I bought my PS3 to play games. Not social network.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:45PM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. When I sit to play I really don't feel like going through the Home experience. It just doesn't appeal to me at all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:50PM Oldtaku said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Bingo. I can't see a single reason why I would be wasting my time in this retarded sterile marketing dystopia with people who are even dumber than the people I encounter on XBox Live (yes I realize how horribly low a standard that is) when I could playing a /game/ like inFAMOUS, or even Flower.


Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:51PM Sly C said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
same. i could just leave the house if i wanted to meet people. and if i want to talk to people without breaking out my phone or leaving the house, i can just voice chat with them in game. so home just isn't appealing to me ATM.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm working on my Doctoral Degree in Anthropology and I have an Xbox. Does that mean I'm dumb. Of course not. Though I will admit that Live is full of arrogant, misanthropic children.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:21PM ummhello said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I've logged into Home maybe 3 times, but even that one game that was closed off was lame. my PS3 is for the games and bluray. joystiq is for the social networking. ;)
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:30PM LarZen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think you are gonna get realy disapointed in the future then...social nettwork is one of the most hot topic for this gen consoles and sertanly the next.

Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:35PM Uphillbothways said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
yeah. i'm in the same boat as umm...hello???.

I've logged into Home before, but I'm not going back.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed! I consider myself a PS3 fanboy, but I sure as hell have seen no reason to ever launch Home.
And I'm not sure how 'In Game Launching' is supposed to fix that...
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:53PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so in other words you dont care to use the Facebook and twitter features on the 360 either??
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 7:13PM U U D D L R L R B A SELECT START said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. My first impression was that Home was going to be more like Free Realms in execution, where there would be several minigames etc that you could use to interact with other users. More or less this is a graphically updated version of instant messenger which I haven't used since the A/S/L days of AOL.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 7:17PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If I wanted to play house, I'd poke holes in my condoms and pay more attention to my wife and her needs.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:25PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can see the appeal for some people, but I don't think the average PS3 user is of the Second Life type.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:59PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But it's not even like Second Life!

I'm one of the 1 in 3 who did log on, and then got bored after 10 mins and have never been on again. There's no custom content, you have to navigate the on-screen keyboard to chat and then there's nothing to do, and almost nowhere to go.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 11:25PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've been on a few times checking out the different spaces (the EA one is really cool) and there is actually stuff to do and games to play that don't cost money which is cool. I think of the service as a pre-cursor of what's to come in the future more so than everything it is at the moment. It's one of those things you like or you don't. Just depends on the individual. But, if some people tried it and gave it the old college try they might be surprised there is some fun to be had. With all that said it's not something I log into all that often but I can see the appeal of it for some. At the same time I can understand while a pre-dominantly core fanbase install base isn't interested in social networking. Thats why the whole 360 E3 announcements confused me as well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 3:03AM Haizeus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd use Home a lot more if there was FREAKING VOICE CHAT!
Here everbody! Enjoy a social network in which you can't socialize!


Sweeeeeeeet
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 2:23PM PN04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can socialize quite easily with home assuming you have basic motor and spelling skills. The point of home is not to Play it the point of it is to network with like minded individuals. Play with them in your online games, find new friends to play and compete against and to add a sense of customization to your experience with the system in terms of an avatar that you can make look almost how ever you want it to look.

Of course not everyone is going to want to use home. Not everyone comes to forums, or uses talk backs or even goes online for that matter that doesnt make it a failure and even if you wanted to compare it to similar things: 1/3rd of 21 million is still 7 million, I'm sure there are plenty of MMOs out there that wish they could boast that many users.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:33PM I am a machineee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm, that's interesting, seeing how I signed in with my roommate's PS3 at 3am the other morning and was very surprised at how many people were in the Plaza and in Uncharted's bar. All chatting it up.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:19PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are the home lobbies region-free?

Could explain the high population at odd hours
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mr Khan - No, each region has it's own servers, and there's several 'instances' in each region.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 9:29PM EngadgetSoFunny said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After a night of drinking a pubs trying to attract girls, nerds realize they are going home to play with their left hand. Desperately seeking human interaction, they log onto the Playstation Home network at 3 am about 1 hour after the local bars closed at 2 am?

I'm wondering if these 7 million connected users include people who sign up for the service, log in once and then once again some other date and never visit for a period of say six months? Does the PS3 connected imply it connected once? or does it imply is there's been a connection made within the past 7? 14? 30? days?

Without reference to what being connected means, this number is kind of useless.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 11:41PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd say follow the source link. That way you can get the source information and not process it like a total douchebag unlike this writer.

"Only 1 in 3..."

Seriously, REALLY?!? I say this because according to MS's latest numbers, roughly 45% of purchased 360s never seen an internet connection. So to validate Home to Andrew Yoon, it has to BEAT Xbox Live percentage users. Not just Gold, mind you. Gold and Silver.

Everyone else reads the article and says stuff like "HOW in the HELL did they manage to sell over 450,000 Star Trek uniforms for avatars?!?" But nope, not here. Screw Home, it is "teh Ghey."

Think about that for a moment. 450,000 trekkie uniforms. Even if we're talking $.99, that's $450K just from one item. Yep, Home sure is Teh Phailz!
Reply

Posted: Jun 27th 2009 12:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i agree that Home is successful in a business outlook, but the majority of the Playstation 3 consumers couldn't care less - Sony has more to gain by catering to us majority than by continuing with petty $450k gains here and there.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't read too much into this-my friend has a 40GB model and hasn't downloaded Home because of space concerns. As I have the 160GB, it wasn't a concern for me.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've used up over 90GB of space, so I can see how the smaller models would be scrunched. DMC4 took up a whole 5GB. Home just isn't important enough to me that I would keep it over games if things got tight.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 7:06PM shiftplusone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell I have a 60 gig that's full, definitely not going to waste space on home again. Had it downloaded, thought it was absolutey pointless and uninstalled that shit. In home launcher? I have to swap the disks anyway, so why not just do it from the xmb instead
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:34PM Magresda said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
21 million PS3's sold, yes, but not nearly the same amount connected to the internet. I'm guessing it's a little more than one in three purely because of that.

That said, I have no interest in home. To me it just seems like a complete waste of time, and the only reason I installed it was to check out that XI stuff.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked the idea of home, but I only log on once a month, get bored rapidly, then ignore it for another 30 days.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:53PM vedichymn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I fire it up every now and then to take a peek at the new zones, but I just don't really find any value at all in home. I'm never going to buy anything in it, and the little minigames aren't terrible, but honestly, I'd just much rather go play Uncharted or Infamous or Resistance 2 instead.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:35PM Jrinswand said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I've had a PS3 for at least a year and have yet to log into Home even once. It just doesn't appeal to me in the slightest.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:04PM Plankfan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Try it, you may just like it!
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:36PM Professor Lario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It just never stood out enough to go through the process. It just seemed like ad driven social networking. Am I wrong? Should I take the time to try it?
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:41PM Lambrick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IF you see any ads, they're all very natural feeling, i.e. they're mostly, if not totally, advertisements for games. it makes the environment feel "realistic" but the infrequency is enough to keep it from being too much. the process of getting into Home is, to me, very easy to go through, and if it means anything, it's somewhat staggered throughout the experience to get some things going right away, rather than getting one huge download going.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 11:39PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's really not all that bad. The cool thing is you can go into the different spaces and play some really cool games for free that are XBLA/PSN quality. It's just an interesting little time sink for an hour or so a week.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:36PM ScottG13 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That actually seems high. I've never even installed the client. I would expect less than 1 in 50 are "regular users." I.E. twice weekly or so.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:37PM AkiraTenshi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I couldnt care less about game launching from Home. Its still a lot less hassal to go straight to the game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:38PM koehler83 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not a very good poll question.

Have I logged into HOME? Yes.

Will I ever do it again? No.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Have I logged into HOME? Yes.
Will I ever do it again? No."

That's exactly what I was gonna say.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:42PM Jrinswand said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Psst. There's a "Reply" button under the first post in every string of posts. Use it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 7:26PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The Joystiq reply button functions properly fewer than 1 in 3 times.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:42PM Cranky Penguin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I put no since I only logged into the beta and have never logged into it again. Like most of you, I just don't see the point of it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Having to download the areas each time is a buzzkill-it takes too long. And no, my Internet is not slow.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:18PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, it doesn't. Unless waiting 15 seconds is too much to you
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 7:45PM ummhello said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...if by 15 seconds you mean 2-3 minutes, yes, it IS too long.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Must be nice to have Fiber Optic...I'd rather spend the extra cash on games. 512k up/down is enough for me. I don't stream media. Call me old-fashioned, but I like physical media better.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:44PM Jonthomasdesigns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um watching stupid dudes dancing is not fun , i will never go "Home" again
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:45PM TrumpetDan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm in the same boat... logged in once about 6 months ago, walked around a bit, and haven't logged into Home since.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just another useless Mii copy. I've only gone into Home like two times on my PS3.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 6:38PM Uphillbothways said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now that you mention it, I don't like the Mii social networking stuff either.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories