| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (28)

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:03PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice. Looks like a promising 2010 release
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:05PM GordoJones88 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Bring on the purple vibrator!
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There have been amazing advances in the world of teledildonics.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 5:25AM Klitorisaurus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I heard that word for the first time today and this is the third time I've seen it, in totally different mediums... Strange how that works!
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:09PM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
psp titles? =/
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:14PM Voshempa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they mean that the techniques that Sony is capable of and/or using will be shown in PSP titles. Not meaning the use of the motion controller, but of the other technologies and techniques.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 2:35AM ptcamn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Remember that the Motion Control uses the PSEye and that Richard Marks is behind the development. Part of what they'll show is based on techniques with the PSEye and the PSP Eye. So on top of showing more of the Motion Control they will probably delve into games using the Eye for both systems such as EyePet for PS3 and Invizimals for PSP (http://www.joystiq.com/2009/06/08/impressions-invizimals-psp/) which were not as heavily featured in the presentations at E3 (they were on the show floor).
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:11PM Voshempa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Saweet. I'm looking forward to hearing more about the device. I feel that the media is overlooking it somewhat, with Natal being praised and cuddled. Gaming is three things: you, a controlling device, and the screen. I don't like when two of those are used as one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.

Sony isn't going overboard like Microsoft, not even Nintendo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call me an old fogie, but motion controls just don't do anything for me. I can see where it would be amusing for awhile, but I'd rather just use my joypad. Although I will say that from what I've seen, Sony's controller looks to be the most enjoyable, and that's coming from a 360 owner.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 9:22PM Wiizer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't think that Sony is going to do a publicity stunt with it until... you know, the product's ACTUALLY DONE.

I wish Microsoft would do the same thing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cool. Hopefully this will mean helping 3rd parties have an easier time with PS3 (and PSP) development.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 8:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not thrilled about Natal or this.. But at least with Natal, you can pretend to be a PreCrime agent and swish through menus with your hand.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 9:17PM Sho Minamimoto said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can do that with eye toy to. Have you seen the demo for that eyepet game (not sure if thats the name). It proved that the eye toy is capable of doing alot of what natal advertised. The only real thing that the natal showed that was different then the eye toy was that the ricochet game allowed you to move forward.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 9:25PM PN04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you can do that with the EYeye already, they just never implemented it with the XMB. I supposed they figured no one wanted to use it that way.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 9:54PM vask said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they got something good going for this it just depends how they execute it. Like every other "cool" perhipheral they made they always do a horrible job pushing it out to the public.

With the Ps3 price drop rumored to be coming around sooner or later, id consider a few options.

- First off eliminate that 120gb sku or change it, its pointless really they should make the higher priced sku and include
The Motion control
One DS controller
The Eyetoy,
HDMI cable (yes they're not that expensive nowadays)
A Game that motion control will be compatible with(something similar to what we saw in E3 with higher production values prefably.)

Since the eyetoy will have a microphone, that should resolve the headset issue by speaking into the camera instead of putting on that stupid mic(also assuming that we will get an ingame chat feature and party system). assuming a MSRP of $399.99 (after eventual price drop)

Then make a cheaper sku 80gb include
a USB headset(if they want to really get fancy a bluetooth headset)
an HDMI cable
One DS Controller
Final Fantasy 7 for PS1 voucher?
the system can be the optional unit for people who don't care for the gimmick and have the OPTION to not use it this one can go for an MSRP $299.99

i think if they did something like that it could help push the "motion controller" and also encourage a more active network(also assuming they manage to get the price point lower and party + chat system on the go).
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 10:02PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the motion controller should be in the cheaper unit to go after Nintendo's audience. Otherwise they are marketing it toward a "core" audience that doesn't care.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 10:07PM vask said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
thats very true, that actually makes the most sense

but only issue is that we know sony is gonna be charging alot for the tech and its already gonna be tough to manage a price drop as it is so i was thinking of something that might actually be reasonable for them to do with their system. but yea if they can put out a cheaper system with the motion control then that would be awesome.

but realistically i doubt that it will happen.
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 10:17PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ mr nimblewick

I'm part of the core audience and I care. I've always wanted to actually do the hacking and slashing instead of hitting buttons. From what I've seen, Sony's motion controller seems much more capable of handling advanced gameplay techniques as apposed to the Wii's waggling which seems best suited for spastic children.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 4:22AM Extinction said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You already can use PSEye or Eyetoy as a microphone
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Where do you plan on plugging in the USB headset? wouldn't that tether you to your console...?
Reply

Posted: Jun 25th 2009 10:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am betting that a lot of people do not have the PS3eye. So pulling a number out of my arse, I would say that the PS3eye 50 bucks, one Wand 30 bucks. Wand with analog stick because we know you need something to move around within the environment. Basically, you end up paying the same thing as a Wiimote and numchuck but you have the additional cost of the Camera. Add motion + to the equation and the Sony solution is about 30 bucks more than the Wii solution.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 2:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"we just painted the wii-mote black but we'll still call it original"

there, got that anticipation out of the way for yous

Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 12:44PM paper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We don't need it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sonys motion controller vs Xbox Natal; who will win?
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 7:02PM Namminamm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no no no!!! its "Sony's Playstation eye + motion controllers vs Xbox Natal: who will win?"
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 8:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like Sony's motion controllers. First day buy if they have good software bundled in.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:14PM onlysublime said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
every time i see that screenshot, i cringe. the wrist angle between the onscreen warrior and the real life person doesn't match. the sword is pointing in the wrong direction between the onscreen and the person. for something that claims to be millimeter accurate, it seems like a major faux pas.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW