| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (98)

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:21AM Tre said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Coincidence? I think NOT!
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 2:40PM velazkid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol thats what I was going to say
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nathan Fillion is the obvious choice.

This actually has a chance of being successful because the first game was so well written and well acted.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:36AM acefondu said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I considered Max Payne to be "well written" in the sense that I love cheesy gritty noir, and the movie offered literally none of that. Like, how hard is it to copy cheesy noir? Not ONE inner monologue in the whole bloody film!

*ahem* So my point is, it's a game to movie film...the odds are against it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:45AM Chief Oddball said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Since the beginning, I've been thinking "Nathan Fillion!" every time I saw Nate Drake. The dude even /sounds/ like him. Obvious casting choice for a film, indeed.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:58PM ummhello said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
yeah, he's perfect for the role. have you guys seen him in the new series "Castle"?
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I thought of David Boreanaz my first time from the tv series Bones... =/
Guess I'm the only one... =(
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 6:43PM Volkodlak said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, he's the obvious second choice yeah... seeing as the game already had perfect casting to begin with.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 7:00PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nathan Fillion would be almost perfect. Let's just hope the movie doesn't suck and end up going direct to video.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 9:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'd much rather have the original voice actors/motion capture people to do their characters in the movie. They are the voice of the characters and they even resemble the characters.

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/06/16/meet-nathan-drake-uncharted-2s-nolan-north/
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/06/17/meet-the-women-of-uncharted-2-among-thieves/
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:22AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
..................Fuck.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
...you!
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:51PM aristokrat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If you like to count
Dots as syllables, then you
Are still short two lines
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 4:45PM xaduurv said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What is with joystiq
commenters and their haiku
getting annoying
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:23AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they use the original voice actor - doesn't look like him but he's young and fit enough to pull it off. Can't imagine anyone else really - same for Elena and Sully.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:26AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I correct myself - he does look like him (I only saw him before in that mo-cap suit and skull cap)
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:35AM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:39AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Hyams
Indeed she does. I really hope they realize they don't have to cast the leads as they are already there.

*goes back to pining for Uncharted 2.... http://www.gametrailers.com/video/extended-warzone-uncharted-2/49328
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:23AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Even though the game is a big seller on PS3, it's nowhere near mainstream pop culture. Why make a movie about it?
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:25AM pd771 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
because it can become mainstream culture, since it captured the essence of Indiana Jones better than the last Indiana Jones? Plus we won't have to see a 70 year old harrison Ford trying to battle Scientologist or whatever the hell Indy 4 was.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:29AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dethgar

Watch the cinematics 1-6 and you'll see why this would be an awesome movie. Here's the first link.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rh-sXAQaGw
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:34AM Van Faulk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Because uncharted already IS an action movie. the script is essentially written already. Just take out a few gunfights and treasure sequences and all the time you spend dying and the story is essentially a modern day indiana jones.

And unlike stuff like Halo and gears, you don't require much in the way of CGI or expensive effects since it is set in the real world.

Now of course we all know Nathan fillion won't be cast. That would make sense. Chances are we are going to be stuck with Shia leboef or Zak Efron or some other flavour of the month pretty boy actor.



Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:53AM jaredgood1 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Should only mainstream pop culture books be made into movies? If yes, then we never would have gotten Fight Club or No Country for Old Men.

Should only mainstream pop culture comic books be adapted into movies? If yes, then we never would have gotten Blade or Iron Man.

There are plenty of elements in Uncharted that can make a really fun movie and that is way more important than it's mainstream saturation point. Besides, provided they make a decent film, you can sell this to plenty of non-gamers as an Indiana Jones/Mummy type adventure movie.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game was pretty much a movie already so why not?
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 4:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The point I was trying to make was that mainstream pop games turned movies usually bomb, and bomb hardcore. I'm not implying that something derived from an ip that isn't in the mainstream should be avoided.

I will pass on the cinematics because I do plan to play the game once the price of the PS3 drops.

I'm not questioning making a movie about the game, just inquiring why they would be inclined to.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 6:19PM leobebes said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@dethgar

I totally understand what you are trying to say, but the PS fanboys can't see what you are trying to say because they are blinded by Japanese Sony infused proteins.

Drakes Fortune was a damn fine game for PS3 standards. It sold well for the PS3 but keep in mind that the PS3 is in third place therefore mainstream saturation for a PS3 game which is not even its number one title would fail to capture the imagination or excite the non gaming public.

Also as fun and fresh as the story seemed to us games, it heavily depended on a cliched rugged, butt kicking, archaeologist/slash treasure hunter storyline like Indian Jones. Hardly a ground breaking genre that would rile up the punditry or critics.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:29AM skyzbig said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A God Of War movie is what we really want, neigh, demand!

That'd be rated 18 for sure...
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 12:15PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think you mean to say that a God of War movie SHOULD be rated R. But it would most definitely be PG-13. They always want that magical PG rating to maximize the audience/box office. God of War could be amazing if they did it 300 style with Zac Snyder or something, but I imagine the budget being massive.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:00PM erh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not to mention, a PG-13 rating would help cash in on all the adolescent boys playing the M-rated video game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 1:08PM The Monarch said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Zack Snyder + God of War = WIN
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 3:40PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nah, the teens who play it (like me) can just get our 17+ year old friends to take us. so definitely rated R
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:34AM coil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Every minute spent playing Uncharted, I was imagining Nathan Fillion in the main role. MAKE IT SO!
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:34AM HeavyToka said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Nathan Fillion would be the perfect choice!
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 5:06PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sadly, Fillion is not a very "marketable" actor. He definitely would be the PERFECT choice as Drake, but since this is potentially a new film franchise I'm sure the studios want to get as much star power as possible to get the movie off its feet.

Then again, the first Transformers didn't have many recognizable faces (Shia LaBeouf and Megan only after became popular) and that movie made RIDICULOUS amounts of money--especially for a new franchise.

So I hope Columbia gets the message about Nathan Fillion, but it doesn't seem likely.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the stupid creatures ruined an otherwise perfect game. i was so disappointed when they entered the story.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:37AM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find it interesting everyone hates them. I never got to experience the twist like most people, because PS3fanboy didn't give a spoiler warning before spoiling the twist in their review. I knew they were coming from the beginning, so I neither hated nor loved them - I nothing'd them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:45AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Brett

I hear you; and yes, one could argue that the story jumped the shark but as the whole game was a nod to the classic serial adventure films it's kind of a genre convention.

Even Indy encountered the supernatural at the end of Raiders and no one seems to complain about that. (We don't speak of Indy after Temple of Doom)
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I liked them. They were like the ghosts coming out of the Ark at the end of Raiders: the really supernatural thing that pushed the story over the edge from plain old action to retro action serial. They weren't perfect, but things got intense and it was kind of fun to run around waving a machine gun instead of ducking all the time.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:54AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Trev - great minds think alike. The mutated spaniards/nazis were a good change of pace gameplay wise. My only real complaint was the jetski sections where you couldn't really move and shoot - and who the hell put all those explosive barrels in the river?

I still want my money back for Indy 4 since I'll never got those two hours back. Conclusive proof that George Lucas should never be involved in a film again. Ever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 11:03AM Haizeus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa! Ontoglory: You really didn't like The Last Crusade? I thought it was much better than Temple of Doom.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 12:30PM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Anthonyjh

No, hated it. I know that it is many people's favorite but it just went so campy. Too much forced humor. The stupid beach scene w/the umbrella and "the pen is mightier than the sword". I want to punch his stupid face every time I hear that line.

But Last Crusade is a towering achievement of cinema compared to Kingdom. I honestly can't believe they let that tripe into theaters. CG monkeys? Swinging fast enough to catch up to speeding cars? The fridge? The dumb nazi with a sword villian?

Indy was raped right in front of my eyes....I expect a full federal idictment of George Lucas
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:35AM Aziz S said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This would be what "The Mummy 3" wasn't.

Pure Fun.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:37AM Marius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Phew now I dont have to buy the first game
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:38AM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No no, you still have to buy it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:47AM OnToGloryReturns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If you haven't played it your life is empty and devoid of joy unbeknownst to you.

Play it - and all your wildest dreams will come true.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I will remain hopeful that this actually turns out to be a good movie. But let's not ignore the elephant in the room, a video game to movie adaptation is almost never good. In fact, I don't know why I say "almost" since no really video game movie immediately comes to mind. Especially if it's from the same individual who penned the Hitman movie.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*no really good video game movie
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 10:41AM Marius said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
just be glad Sony is doing it and not Fox
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 11:05AM DreamerAbe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack: Silent Hill wasn't great, but it was a really good movie. Imho, the only good video game movie. Sure, it sucks that they changed some details of the story, namely the mother being sort of Harry Mason instead of the father, but almost all movies change some details of the source material. Btw, Nathan Fillon HAS to be Nate. He looks older than Nate, but the most important traits of the character- the swagger, attitude, confidence, personality, and wittiness is already there in Fillon. He doesn't need to force this character as he's already Nate more or less.
Reply

Posted: Jun 26th 2009 11:26AM halebound00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack.....I take it you never saw a little classic known as Super Mario Brothers.....wait......sorry, you were right.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW