MGS4 / Killzone 2 PS3 bundle available ... now!

by Ben Gilbert { Jul 7th 2009 at 11:30AM }

As per the deluge of tips we received regarding an 80GB PlayStation 3 bundle with Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4, the Best Buy website is now reflecting the deal. The bundle retains the price of a regular ol' 80GB PS3 ($400), but will include both of the PS3 exclusive titles. Rumors surrounding the 80GB bundles suggest it's an effort to make space for an upcoming PS3 Slim on store shelves -- and considering the $90 worth of free games Sony is throwing at consumers, it's quite possible that shelf space will open for the next console iteration.

[Via Engadget]

Tags: 80gb, best-buy, business, engadget, killzone-2, metal-gear-solid-4, mgs4, ps3-slim, retail

Related From Joystiq

Analyst: 'Sony was saved by the success of the Wii'
3 days ago
Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising getting DLC tomorrow
3 days ago
Wal-Mart offering $100 gift card with purchase of Xbox 360 Arcade
3 days ago

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 11:33AM

Not a bad deal, I wouldn't say the games are free though.

Latin_Trident @ Jul 7th 2009 12:00PM

*running out the door to go pick it up now*...

JUST KIDDING!!!

dogmaticatheist @ Jul 7th 2009 12:01PM

If it's the same price as the console without the games, how are they not free?

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 12:12PM

@dogmaticathiest

It's a basic economic principle: "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch."

In this case you're buying a system that is probably about to be put out to pasture, either that or Sony is just trying to stimulate flagging hardware sales. Someone is paying for those bundled games somehow, and that someone is probably you.

Sorry for the double post.

dip @ Jul 7th 2009 12:13PM

Uh, really? Given you have to buy the bundle to get them but considering the value of the two games are not included into the price, I'm pretty sure "free" is an appropriate enough description lest you want to argue semantics.

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 12:25PM

It's not arguing semantics, it's basic economics. Often times things that are said to be free actually have hidden costs, like how you end up paying for "free" food at happy hour with all the drinks you buy.

If you don't think the value of the two games are included in the price one way or another, you are dead wrong.

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 12:44PM

Downvote me all you want, it doesn't change the facts. By the way Sony isn't the only one that does this, look at Microsoft with their Halo 3/Fable 2 bundle.

Related reading for those that want to learn and not just get mad:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TANSTAAFL

dogmaticatheist @ Jul 7th 2009 12:58PM

@Neuromancer :

> Often times things that are said to be free actually have hidden costs, like how
> you end up paying for "free" food at happy hour with all the drinks you buy.

Unless you can explain where those hidden costs are, you haven't proved your point. A wikipedia article doesn't count as evidence to support your claim, since it does not address this particular scenario.

The cost is $399 for the console plus the 2 games, and that's all you have to pay, ever.

> By the way Sony isn't the only one that does this, look at Microsoft with their
> Halo 3/Fable 2 bundle.

And your point is? They are bundling first party games, so the cost to them is probably pretty low. They both probably
realized that the sales increases from such bundles outweigh the negligible costs of including quality first party titles.

It's called business decisions.

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 1:05PM

The Wikipedia article was not there as evidence for my point. It was just there for anyone who wanted to understand the TANSTAAFL principle which is taught in just about every introductory economics course in the world, because it's true.

You can't argue with the fact that someone had to pay to manufacture those games. It may have been relatively low cost for Sony but it wasn't free. Sony is basically writing off the cost of the games to sell units.

I'm just saying there's a different way to look at these games, that's all. Not sure where all the hate comes from. All downvoting me does is make people want to read what I have to say anyway.

Nick @ Jul 7th 2009 1:23PM

The games are free. The current price of an 80 GB PS3 without anything bundled with it is $399 and the bundle comes with two games that, if bought separately, would add up to about $90. The consumer is getting the games for free. There is no other way of looking at it.

DrXym @ Jul 7th 2009 1:32PM

Actually the games are free since if you were intending on buying a PS3 now you can do so and get 2 games for the same price.

Whether that is smart or not really depends on if you want to wait for a potential price drop / slim in 3-4 months, whether you care about what features the slim has or hasn't, and whether you care about the form factor at all. Its even possible the slim has gotchas that still make the older model desirable. For example, if the Slim has an external power brick, or no power switch, or other cost saving tweaks, or reliability is poorer then maybe its not a good idea to buy. There's no way to say until Sony actually say what it does.

Even if a slim does appear the chances are it will be initially bundled up to ensure it costs more than the 80Gb models until they're cleared out.

Personally I think I would wait and compare the two.

DeepFriedSushi @ Jul 7th 2009 1:59PM

@_@

you people really hate neuromancer.

Latin_Trident @ Jul 7th 2009 2:06PM

"I wouldn't say the games are free though"

Neuromancer does make a point. The games are not free in the sense that they are produced and created free of charge. That is to say, the developers made it for free. What we consumers view as free is not really free in the sense that we are not paying for it as it is included.

"so the cost to them is probably pretty low."
dogmaticatheist does realize the point Neuromancer stated earlier in realizing that MS does the same thing and that they are paying for the cost. Sony in the same sense is also taking the cost in one way or another. My point being, Sony is paying so you can have "free games". Just like when the PS3 cost (estimate) $900 when it first came out, consumers were only paying $500 so Sony was "giving away" $400 by paying the consumers share of the true cost of a PS3.

I studied economics too. As a matter of fact, I study it at times just for the heck of it. I know, i'm a geek.

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 2:12PM

You have restored my faith in humanity, Latin Trident.

dogmaticatheist @ Jul 7th 2009 3:06PM

@Latin_Trident:

I got his point, but it's completely irrelevant. Of course it costs SONY, I even acknowledged that. However, he stated that WE the CONSUMER are going to be paying for those games "one way or another", probably through some kind of hidden cost. So in essence, he was claiming that the games are not free to CONSUMERS, which is just dead wrong. And he fails to cite any possible hidden costs as supporting evidence. He's simply playing a semantics game, to try to sound smart, but as I and many others have pointed out, he's dead wrong about what he initially claimed.

Mo @ Jul 7th 2009 5:05PM

the games will not be free until you buy the bundle, remove the cellophane and UNLEASH THEM!!!!!!

FREE THE GAMES!!!

TreyIM @ Jul 7th 2009 9:46PM

I agree with dogmaticatheist - Neuromancer, what you're saying goes without saying in regards to virtually ANYTHING consumers by at retail cost and there is no need to try to look smart. Yes, some people don't quite understand that part of things but you're more trying to sound like a smarty pants than anything else as what you said truly didn't need to be.

Neuromancer @ Jul 7th 2009 11:35PM

Anyone else want to jump on the bandwagon? I am being crucified by pointing out a basic economic principle that no one apparently believes in or wants to hear.

Cerpin Taxt @ Jul 7th 2009 11:34AM

This bundle is grundles of good.

mvp576 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:35AM

If this doesn't sell agillion units i might just give up on humanity all at once.

Can i get a facepalm anyone?

Jason Statham (Aka Vegeta) @ Jul 7th 2009 11:44AM

Well it probably won't since:

A. "agilion" isn't a real number

B: It's still $400.

Snowblind @ Jul 7th 2009 11:46AM

If I didn't own a PS3, I don't think this deal would do anything for me either.. Again, it's still the same price, and neither of these games particularly interest me. I enjoyed MGS4 for the most part, but one play through was enough - I'd only buy my own copy if they release an upgraded version again.

Both games can be bought pretty cheap now anyway, actually lowering the price would have a much bigger effect.

hunter2223 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:53AM

For people who understand the intrinsic value of the PS3, but still are unable to get over the price-point are for the most part not going to be swayed. Adding games is a good thing, but the actual value added is not as high as I'd want to just jump on in.

If they'd give me the system, without the games, but with the value of the games ($90 new I believe) reduced from the price, so $310, I'd be there now buying one and spend the extra $90 on games of my choosing.

mr nimblewick @ Jul 7th 2009 11:58AM

I've been skeptical of bundles since I got a great deal on a Sega Saturn with 3 free games.

MLS @ Jul 7th 2009 12:18PM

yeahhhh... As much as I loved MGS3... I think I can wait on MGS4 even longer. I know I will play it and enjoy it, but i'm not itching. RIght now, it's only the online content that interests me most about the PS3, and I can't justify buying a console for that kind of thing. Maybe if they packed in a $50 PSN card instead of killzone...

Archon (PSN: Archonik, XBL: DarkARHN) @ Jul 7th 2009 3:23PM

If "agillion" means 10, a winner is you.

Storm Eagle::The Blood Edge @ Jul 7th 2009 11:38AM

BOO!!! This bundle.

It's still $400 and people don't want to pay that. What if people don't want those games? Quit dickin' around and just drop the damn price.

And yes, I know I said this yesterday but dammit, it ain't right!

Hyams @ Jul 7th 2009 12:01PM

Bundles like this one are designed to clear up the stock of the current 80gbs. Then they're gonna release the Slim model in August, presumably with a price cut.

davidchege @ Jul 7th 2009 11:41AM

hopefully this means uncharted will go and become a platinum hit....one can dream!!!

Storm Eagle::The Blood Edge @ Jul 7th 2009 11:44AM

Probably not until Uncharted 2 comes out. If you're holding out, Uncharted is worth it at $60. First game I bought for my PS3 and best game I played in 2008.

rells009 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:46AM

If Sony's smart they'll have an Uncharted 2 bundle when it's released, and if they're really smart they'll have an Uncharted mega-bundle with Uncharted 1 & 2 to coincide with the release of Slim PS3.

davidchege @ Jul 7th 2009 11:48AM

oh, i have played it and beat it, i just want to own it and play it again before uncharted 2 comes out....but yea i agree, worth every penny

B3astofthe3ast @ Jul 7th 2009 11:57AM

Uncharted is already a greatest hit...

[tre] @ Jul 7th 2009 12:01PM

The term "Platinum Hits" is Xbox only. We refer to PS3 bestsellers as "Greatest Hits".

dip @ Jul 7th 2009 12:08PM

They're only called that in North America. The European equivalent of "Greatest Hit's" are called "Platinum" games.

http://www.game.co.uk/lowdown.aspx?lid=9573

The more you know...

[tre] @ Jul 7th 2009 12:12PM

Well now I feel sheepish.

http://bigdaddycool.info/images/sheepish.jpg

davidchege @ Jul 7th 2009 12:13PM

WTF....it didn't let me reply to my own damn comment....anyway...you got what i meant...lol....haven't had coffee yet.....and it's 60 bucks at best buy and anywhere else I've looked,....

Mana37 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:43AM

People who don't want these games don't deserve to live.

WREturns @ Jul 7th 2009 12:30PM

I said it yesterday and I'll say it today, I think the WALL-E/LBP bundle was a better deal. If you're into Metal Gear you might love this but I'm just not that into Metal Gear. And Killzone 2 was the most disappointing game I've played this year and I've played a lot of games this year.

HeXeN @ Jul 7th 2009 12:56PM

@WREturns

Your KZ2 bashing is getting old already,this like your 20th post saying the same crap.

Kdiggy @ Jul 7th 2009 2:33PM

Wait for Halo STD untill you make the most disappointing game of the year decision.

WINterfang @ Jul 7th 2009 11:41AM

I think I'll pass, I'm happy with my Xbox and my downvote.

Geist @ Jul 7th 2009 12:14PM

It's like you're prophetic.

Hashbrown Hunter (OneGiantCluster.blogspot.com) @ Jul 7th 2009 12:41PM

I'm sure those glasses help. They're appropriately FUNK-AY for prophetic visions.

DeepFriedSushi @ Jul 7th 2009 2:04PM

^dumbsheep doesnt know jsr.

Kdiggy @ Jul 7th 2009 2:30PM

*facepalm*

Blackmagic1o0 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:42AM

Damn they are just doing anything to get rid of those PS3's

Mana37 @ Jul 7th 2009 11:44AM

This bundle almost makes me wish I would've waited a year to buy my PS3... almost.

shase @ Jul 7th 2009 11:45AM

it is still 400$. Although the value is undeniably good but it is still 400$ and some people look ONLY at that price regardless the value. It is all psychological.

Jrod @ Jul 7th 2009 6:29PM

Those people are the same tards who will buy something at $19.99,but not $20. $400 includes 2 GAMES.

If they can't read what's in an actual box and judge prices accordingly,I don't want those people on PSN. God help me if they somehow end up on my team.

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 50 Comments