| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (44)

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This whole thing is getting more and more bizarre by the day.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:26AM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I absolutely loved Bioshock, and have zero interest in this game.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:10PM latin trident said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am still interested in the game but I don't think I will be pre-ordering it. This game will most likely fall under the "I'll wait for my friends, joystiq, and gamespot to review it." category and if I like what I hear, I'll pull out my wallet...or borrow it from a friend.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:42PM Mazrael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Couldn't they just drop the multiplayer..? I personally won't be bothering with it.. that money spent on MP could go into making a more complete campaign
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I've found that if its not the original developer that game comes out much worse...*coughguitarhero3-5,CoD3,wawcough*.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 3:21PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WaW was actually pretty good. easily an 8/10. nowhere near COD4, but still, it's not as bad as you make it out to be. COD3 though? eww.
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2009 6:48PM Boomzilla said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
CoD3 was better than WaW. They just took the goods from Call 4 and dropped the good ideas that they had in Call 3. I miss being able to throw a 'nade in the hatch of a tank.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:19AM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The more, the merrier?
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't like the idea that they haven't even gotten to making levels yet...
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:22AM Lucky The Fox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Between all these studios and the 7-inch vinyls they're sending out to the fans for free, I have to wonder how bloody much money they expect to make with this game.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:27AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
7-inch vinyl records (you may be shot if you say "vinyls" in the wrong crowd)? Where?
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:57AM Lucky The Fox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://forums.2kgames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39974

Essentially, some people have received nice swag in return of sending a letter to an address in the game's promo site http://www.somethinginthesea.com

I apologize to any audiophiles out there.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:28AM Mayor West said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loved the first one... but with all of the great games coming out in the crowed end of year release schedule, I might hold off on this. Anyone else feel the same?
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:50PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. I loved the first game but I feel oddly unexcited for the sequel.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:55PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bought into the hype of the first one and hated it...fighting the same two enemies over and over... I stopped after beating that guy with the golf club.

I'm not interested in this one at all. I wish they would kindly abandon this game
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:28AM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This... this is getting a little concerning.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:29AM Benedict said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well... At least one of the original developers' names is there (2K Australia)... Right..?

I just hope that the addition of Arkane Studios is only a new thing to us. That is, I hope they've been designing the levels since the wee hours of development instead of... Well, the 10th of July, 2009.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Anyone remember when games used to be made by like, 10 different people? Now they're made by 10 different companies.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:43AM ACLerok212 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes I remember, but what are you getting at? Current gen games should still be made by 10 man teams? I'd be interested to see how long a 10 man team would take to make a MGS4.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think he was getting at anything. He was just commenting on the fact that back in the day games used to be made by a fraction of the people that it takes to make a game now.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 2:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Welcome to the age of over-reaction. Where every small news story gets a "I'm so concerned about this" now.
If Bioshock 2 sucks, its not because it had 4 different studios attached to it, it'll probably be because there didn't need to be a Bioshock 2.
Adding more studios doesn't mean they will be "designing" things ... they mostly were added to finish off coding and content work. This is common practice in any (software) development cycle, and is very common in gaming. Its All Hands on Deck time, time to get the game out.
Its not like there is designing happening this late anyways, the game "should" be in the final push to release.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:43AM HazyCloud said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
At this rate, the next dev to work on BioShock will be Treyarch.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Nash. Rockstar will be next. And there will be prostitutes and car chase scenes!
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:58AM Lucky The Fox said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
GTA: Rapture. ...I think I'd buy it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:58PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
people need to lay of treyarch. ok so they may not have the talent of all of the 10-year vets at IW but for christsakes you guys act like treyarch is a bad studio. Cod3 and WaW are not bad games at all. compared to a lot of the other ww2 shooters they are actually towards the top of the heap.

5 years from now they're gonna be this amazing studio and everyone is gonna be all over their dicks
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 3:00PM Darthweder said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Paul
And maybe they should stand up for themselves and demand they be taken out from beneath Infinity Ward's shadow. Maybe then people wouldn't call their games bad, because when compared to Infinity Ward's, they are.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 5:07PM McWilly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, they're not.
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2009 6:50PM Boomzilla said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, they are.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game will ship with the first level. The other 9 levels will be DLC for a convenient 400 points...each. And people will still buy it!
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So having 4+ studios working on a game guarantees that the game will suck? How much precedent is there for that assumption?
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like they brought more people in in a push to hit deadline (This thing is due out in what, two months?).

Not a very encouraging sign. Even if its a very good game conceptually, this sort of hustle will all but guarantee an unpolished and untested (read: probably buggy) experience.

I forsee an early patch for one.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long as each studio has VERY well defined tasks it shouldn't be too much of a problem. I'm more concerned about the impression this sends. It's like they're trying to save the game 'cause they know it sucks.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who cares!! As long as the game is awesome none of this matters!
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This could be a hot mess.. If they dont play their cards right..
Or, it could be one of the best games of this year..\
I mean, two heads are better than one. More people, more ideas.. its just how they put it together that decides whether it's good or not...
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 12:51PM 3dpenguin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There already is a punchline thanks to Tootsie Roll Candy Company

"How many devs does it take to screw up a BioShock 2?"
"The world may never know..."
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:14PM Noxat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is starting to feel like a 'straight to DVD' sequel. At least it hasn't dropped to the lowly realms of 'made for TV' sequel yet.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully this will give Arkane Studios the money to finish The Crossing.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 1:41PM Jack Tretton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"'Arkane is assisting in the creation of levels that embody the aesthetic and gameplay ideals that make BioShock such a unique and exciting experience,' 2K Marin's Alyssa Finley explained..."

How about knocking on the door of the developer who made the first game "such a unique and exciting experience"? That would be 2K Boston, right?
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 2:15PM ChomskyKnows said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Somebody better be holding the reigns because this sounds more and more like a clusterfuck all the time. Seems like the developer(s) and/or publisher couldn't even figure out what the game itself was called (at any rate - they clearly didn't seem to be able to control the message). No Ken Levine, 4-thousand different developers, farmed-out tacked on multiplayer. I don't want to cart around a little sister for half the game -- that was my least favorite level from the first one.

This sounds like a bizarre "by committee" thing instead of a developer's labor of love.

Nevertheless, the first one is still probably my favorite game, so I will buy the second one no matter what. But, I'm worried. I want this thing to be a 9.5 or better.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 2:19PM ChomskyKnows said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i meant the "reins"...but then again...
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 2:54PM AliasIncognito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sad truth is that the game is practically guaranteed to make money since it will just ride on the success of the first game. They know if just like we know it.

It's a shame but at the end of the day it's about the money, not the quality.

Course if they more foresight they'd see higher quality now means more money in future sequels.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 2:58PM AliasIncognito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well that's assuming that the quality is in fact suffers from having another studio work on it. But who knows maybe they are all on top of things.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 4:55PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When you have them many people remotely working on a project, the result is oftentimes a complete goatfvck. Geography still makes things less efficient.

Hopefully, they can pull it together, but I'm not holding my breath. The effort sounds difficult and traditionally, sequels (outside of stuff in the COD reality-distortion field) don't usually do so well.

Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2009 8:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm so uninterested in BioShock 2, they could add 5 more devs to the mix before I could be bothered to raise an eyebrow.

I can't blame anyone for being skeptical though. It reflects poorly on 2K Marin when it looks like they need all this extra help.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW