When we first discussed kung-fu action game Invincible Tiger: The Legend of Han Tao, we were so unnerved by the lack of any actual, on-screen tigers that we couldn't bring ourselves to report much actual info about it. Now, we've got some more details courtesy of Eurogamer, including a price (1200 MS points/$15) and a release window (sometime this August).
If you're having trouble placing Invincible Tiger, you might remember it's presented in stereoscopic 3D, if you've got a TV that works with that sort of thing ... which you probably don't. Trust us.
Reader Comments (37)
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:06AM (Unverified) said
Actually, everyone is reading the title wrong. It says "Invicible Tiger coming in August to XBLA, PSN"
Note: Invicible does not equal Invisible, nor Invincible.
Reply
Note: Invicible does not equal Invisible, nor Invincible.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:23AM Tre said
No, no, it's because of the fact that there's the word "Tiger" in the title that they were surprised. I don't get why though, considering that all those kung fu movies with "Dragon" in their names didn't have any dragons. (The ones I've seen haven't, anyway)
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:18AM Tre said
You're getting Valve (they made Left 4 Dead, Half Life, etc., and aren't fans of the PS3) confused with Media Molecule (the British guys who made LittleBigPlanet, love the PS3).
Unless Media Molecule didn't make the remake of Rag Doll Kung Fu. All I know is that they made the original before creating the company.
Reply
Unless Media Molecule didn't make the remake of Rag Doll Kung Fu. All I know is that they made the original before creating the company.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:20AM (Unverified) said
ragdoll kung fu wasnt valves it was media molecules, it was just on steam...
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:46AM xThePunisherx said
Why is this site braindead?
He means Valve's take on MM's RDKF (which was so bad it was free at one point xD).
Reply
He means Valve's take on MM's RDKF (which was so bad it was free at one point xD).
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 12:03PM (Unverified) said
But wait, there's more!
Title: Rag Doll Kung Fu
Genre: Indie
Developer: Mark Healey
Release Date: Oct 12, 2005
Languages: English
I assume Healey founded MM then. No, I will not google it.
Reply
Title: Rag Doll Kung Fu
Genre: Indie
Developer: Mark Healey
Release Date: Oct 12, 2005
Languages: English
I assume Healey founded MM then. No, I will not google it.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:12AM (Unverified) said
Another $15 game!
What do they think, that we're swimming in money like Scrooge McDuck, these days?
Reply
What do they think, that we're swimming in money like Scrooge McDuck, these days?
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:18AM Uncle Jesse said
Yeah, I'm not liking the new trend for pricing. Now knowing that Shadow Complex will be $15, every other game going for that same price better be just as good or at least offer the same amount of polish and length to it.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:23AM Snowblind said
Smaller games continue to be priced at $10, while these bigger ones are $15, I'm not sure why this is so hard to grasp. I can't say I have much of an interest in buying many of these more expensive games, but I simply don't buy them.
Can't wait for Splosion Man next week.
Reply
Can't wait for Splosion Man next week.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:25AM vidguy said
Which is normally an absolutely stupid pricing scheme. Normally, you'd see something like 20,000 copies sold at $15 ($300,000) and 35,000 sold at $10 ($350,000), so the lower price makes you more money. BUT, with unknown digital distribution games, I guess they figure that price won't make a big difference in getting their game recognized. If you can't attract more people, the higher price is smarter.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:23AM (Unverified) said
What kind of TV do you need to have to do stereoscopic 3D? Seems like a weird feature for a game of this, uh, caliber...
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:51AM (Unverified) said
I guess I would expect to see something like this in a bigger budget game, that's all
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 4:45PM (Unverified) said
Stereoscopic 3D will work on any TV with a 120 mhz referesh rate, if I'm not mistaken. You also must be playing through an HDMI cable. Most HD TV's that have been manufactured in the last 10 months are starting to support 120, and all moving forward (except for off-brand Wal-Mart TV's) will be supporting the higher referesh rate. All HD TV's up to this point only support 60 mhz refresh. Just check the TV box or look up your TV's info on Best Buy's website or something like it.
It gets worse though... depending on what brand of TV you have, you'll need different kinds of 3D glasses. The current Samsung DLP's that support 3D require powered 3D glasses that cost around $100 each, while the new Sony LCD's will work with the same type of stereoscopic 3D glasses you get from the movie theater these days (or about $5 each). However, the entry level price for purchasing a Sony LCD TV is higher than a Samsung DLP of similiar screen size. I have the Samsung 60 inch DLP and I LOVE it, but I don't have the same problem of noticing the "rainbow effect" that some people have when they see a DLP image.
My advice would be to do some research at Best Buy or wherever and compare the overall costs to get yourself up and running with stereoscopic 3D, and which type of display you prefer (LCD/DLP). Plasma's probably work too, but I'm a plasma hater... overrated image quality IMOP.
Reply
It gets worse though... depending on what brand of TV you have, you'll need different kinds of 3D glasses. The current Samsung DLP's that support 3D require powered 3D glasses that cost around $100 each, while the new Sony LCD's will work with the same type of stereoscopic 3D glasses you get from the movie theater these days (or about $5 each). However, the entry level price for purchasing a Sony LCD TV is higher than a Samsung DLP of similiar screen size. I have the Samsung 60 inch DLP and I LOVE it, but I don't have the same problem of noticing the "rainbow effect" that some people have when they see a DLP image.
My advice would be to do some research at Best Buy or wherever and compare the overall costs to get yourself up and running with stereoscopic 3D, and which type of display you prefer (LCD/DLP). Plasma's probably work too, but I'm a plasma hater... overrated image quality IMOP.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:33AM (Unverified) said
Had a go at this a moth or so ago, you need the glasses as well as the tv. Not a great game though to be honest but a nice demonstartion of the tech.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said
I'd be all about some kung-fu fighting if not for the $15. Sheesh, especially for a platformer that by nature has limited replayability. Ten and under would be the sweet spot.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:47AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said
TIGER UPPERCUT!
Sorry, someone had to.
Reply
Sorry, someone had to.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 11:57AM (Unverified) said
I love this screenshot, looks like three guys doing an intense dance together. Hopefully there's some Flashdance music in the background...
Note to self: make a game called Kung Fu Dance-off...
Reply
Note to self: make a game called Kung Fu Dance-off...
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 12:04PM Peacefuloutrage said
Or Westside Story..
When you're a Jet, you're a Jet..
Reply
When you're a Jet, you're a Jet..
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 12:01PM (Unverified) said
Do I get to spam uppercuts, shots, knees, genocides, and destruction in here? :P
*I dare anyone to miss the joke*
Also, Namco Bandai, just promote your "Big in Japan, niche... in America!" franchises like Gundam, Tales, Xenosaga, Super Robot Wars, Summon Night, Ar Tonelico, to name a few, instead of wasting what could have been PR money for any of these. Last I checked, the first three were flops, due to lack of PR, as the latter three mentioned are being promoted by niche localizers.
Reply
*I dare anyone to miss the joke*
Also, Namco Bandai, just promote your "Big in Japan, niche... in America!" franchises like Gundam, Tales, Xenosaga, Super Robot Wars, Summon Night, Ar Tonelico, to name a few, instead of wasting what could have been PR money for any of these. Last I checked, the first three were flops, due to lack of PR, as the latter three mentioned are being promoted by niche localizers.
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 1:26PM (Unverified) said
My Samsung DLP TV is 3D Ready. I just have to buy the glasses to go with it.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 1:52PM User Formerly Known as Dave said
Really? I have a Samsung DLP. Are they all 3D capable?
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 2:11PM (Unverified) said
I don't think they all are, but it should say in your manual or something if it is.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 1:57PM (Unverified) said
This game looks not very good. I'll try the demo though to give it a chance. But based on the screen shots it looks bad.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 2:44PM Chopper731 said
Yeah, this game doesn't looks great. Definitely does not look like its worth $15 and from the looks of it I'd rather play Ragdoll Kung Fu... which was $10.
Reply
Posted: Jul 15th 2009 4:49PM (Unverified) said
I saw this game at GDC last year running in 3D. The game itself is no Tekken, but it is a fun and straight forward beat-em up that's good for wasting time with friends. the 3D effect, if you have the TV, is worth the price alone just to show off what your TV can do. It looks amazing in motion.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 152 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










