| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (70)

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 2:04AM Fullmetal Salchemist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry. I cannot respond to any further inquiries because I am dead.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 6:30PM OMGOMG said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dang!

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 7:04PM rigmutton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strange, since 4 days earlier, the production director said otherwise: http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/07/13/fallout-3-downloadable-content-on-psn/

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 7:05PM rigmutton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mea culpa; I misread and thought it was saying will not be raised to 30; oops!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 7:55PM squeehunter said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Must hold in... rage unrelated to level cap... Fallout 3 would have been a lot better had it gone to some other company!

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 8:36PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the only other team i could think of is Bio Ware... but FO3 is great how it is now IMO
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 9:09PM Newfiescreech16 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well Hopefully the PS3 version gets upped to level 30 as well

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 11:51PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its getting all the DLC as well.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 10:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll agree that you're pretty much invincible outside the DLC areas at 30. With a follower outside the DLC areas, even very hard mode isn't too bad. A new cap is really not needed I think. If you want to increase the challenge, try to go everywhere without a follower. I hate how every single tough enemy will always focus on my follower, so I don't even take any damage at all. Kind of ruins the fun. Fawkes turns the normal mode into very easy pretty much.

The biggest challenge is in the Point Lookout areas on very hard against Feral Ghoul Reavers. I HATE those things! Using my A2-31 Plasma Rifles makes it a bit easier, but I try to avoid using that. The challenge of Point Lookout was pretty much perfect. Not too hard and not too easy.

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 10:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Has anyone seen what the bruisers and creepers do around the camp fire? It's pretty funny.

Posted: Jul 18th 2009 11:10PM Alex0022 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should completely get rid of the level cap. It is stupid. All they have to do is make it take longer to level up to make it work better with no cap. I think it is pointless to limit people in a game like this. Sure, it will get too easy eventually, but that's a fitting reward for all the time that would be spent getting a level that high. They could also just add more enemies to help balance it. Maybe I'm crazy, but I just do not see the point in a level cap on a single player game unless they used it on higher difficulties to keep you from being to good.

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 3:59AM Hakobus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Though the company is farming out development of next year's expansion Fallout: New Vegas to Obsidian"

Sooo, when was it announced that New Vegas would be an expansion? I thought Hines said that while it's not a sequel to Fallout 3, it's "another game in the [same] universe". So it's not an expansion.

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 8:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh.

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 9:22AM metatron5369 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Farming out"?!

How can you "farm out" development to the original creators of the series? This looks to be Van Buren with the Gamebryo engine.

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Obsidian isn't the original developer. Yes, there are members of Black Isle that work at Obsidian, and yes, it was founded by former members of Black Isle, but the rights to the game are owned by Bethesda, which means Bethesda farms out the development to another studio (in this case, Obsidian).
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 10:31AM squeehunter said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I didn't say the game sucked, I said it could have been a lot better with someone else. Bethesda is a lazy-ass developer.

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 2:40PM MrCassian said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Lazy? You spend upwards of around 4 years making a game, and then start making buffer content to keep those gamers playing, and they're LAZY? Nice way to put it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2009 8:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They spend too much time on content and not enough time on game-killing bugs and glitches.

Also what's up with Bethesda not hiring more than 5 people to do voice work? That's super annoying and just looks cheap and lazy to us gamers.
Reply

Posted: Jul 20th 2009 1:40AM DontFwithMeimOnPCP said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Though the company is farming out development of next year's expansion Fallout: New Vegas to Obsidian, the Fallout IP is still very much in Bethesda's hands"


So new vegas is the next expansion?

Posted: Jul 21st 2009 10:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think when i buy games from now on, i will wait for the dlc packs to be out before i waste my money on them. by the time dlc comes out, i dont care about the game anymore and i am ready to move on!

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW