| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was an ok game, but like I keep saying games that create a unique idea but just make everything in the game depend on that...and not expand on it, the game gets boring after a while.

I was addicted to destroying everything until about halfway through, then it was just doing the same missions all the time and the appeal had worn off.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:08PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea once you've destroyed everything it's kind of like "now what?"

I wish at the end of the campaign they had done something like given you the resconstructor, to rebuild the settlements. I thought it was kind of weird that the EDF was still hanging around after Mars had been "liberated."

Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 3:27PM Tephlon said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
See, I didn't feel that way. I was pleased as hell about how they made it difficult enough to make you really think about how you approached each task. I also just like how you got to choose nearly everything you did or didn't do. there was very little 'forced' on you.

I really appreciated that.

I also really liked how the destruction progressed, so you were doing 'the same thing' but 'differently' through the whole game.

I mean, I started out using the hammer and remote mines as my primary mode of destruction. but the proxy, RL, Nano rifle, thermobaric rocket, jetpack, and raildriver all totally changed the way I destroyed targets.

Of course, YMMV. (as yours seemed to).
To each his own, I guess.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it. The article says this guy's a CEO but he doesn't sound like an asshat. What gives?
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:44PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
He looks more like your cool grandpa than a CEO.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
his name isn't Bobby Kotick?
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:58PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He doesn't work for Activision.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:46PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Red Faction wasn't a big day one seller because it was a good game that wasn't supposed to be good. It wasn't something that was hyped up for years or anything like that, it was just...good. And as such, its sales spread through word of mouth after release.

I don't care how many commercials they could've thrown up for it, I never would have bought it were it not for people on XBL that I play games with telling me how good it was.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:05PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pretty sure that most games that are made are "supposed" to be good.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:14PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? Semantics?

Sorry, "Red Faction wasn't a big day one seller because it was a good game that most people didn't think the game was going to be good."

Is that better or is there something else you'd like to nitpick about? And while we're at it, your sentence isn't grammatically correct without an "I'm" at the beginning. See, you're not the only one that can nit-pick about crap that doesn't matter ;)
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:27PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa, touchy much?

I got what you were saying, I just thought it was a weird way of putting it.
It almost sounded like you were saying "it wasn't supposed to be good," because people weren't expecting anything good from the Red Faction series.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well said bro. this IS a great game and online multiplayer kick major arse!
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:39PM Brythefry said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My thoughts exactly.

The hype wasn't there. The good quality of the game caught people by "surprise" when the demo came out and more talking the game up after release.

Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 1:47PM Mogwai 279 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I picked this up from Amazon for $40 and couldn't be happier with it. It was one of those games I thought I would easily pass on but from everything I heard and at that price I decided to give it a shot. Well worth the money. By the way if you have a 360 and haven't gotten it, amazon still lists it at $40.
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 11:13AM bleepbloop said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you know what sold me on picking RF:G up? the multiplayer demo. you know, the demo that for some reason got pulled off of xbox live after eleven days, and only few days after the retail version came out? i'm willing to bet that hurt sales, as i have several friends that went to grab the demo after i told them how good it was, only to find it wasn't there anymore. and there's a solid chance they would have picked up the game after trying the mp demo, as i'm sure many other people would have. i can't figure out the logic in pulling the demo off live, since it's not as if they shut down the demo servers when they did and it was a highly anticipated game.

oh well, it's a great game and i'm glad i got it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@tmacairjordan87

I'm with you. Destroying stuff is fun but thats pretty much all you do....boring..
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:14PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? Semantics?

Sorry, "Red Faction wasn't a big day one seller because it was a good game that most people didn't think the game was going to be good."

Is that better or is there something else you'd like to nitpick about? And while we're at it, your sentence isn't grammatically correct without an "I'm" at the beginning. See, you're not the only one that can nit-pick about crap that doesn't matter ;)
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:20PM shimrra74 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the whole advertising approach of this game was just right. Its a double edge sword you over hype the game and you stand the chance of not living up to the hype or dont push the game and your game gets lost in the shuffle.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:29PM The Pork said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't usually bother to comment these days, but I will here, because it's worth noting that RF: G is, for me so far, game of the year. It's flippin' fantastic. Besides the awesome destruction physics and sweet multiplayer, I really like how solid the controls are (it's not a shooter per se, but it's easier to control than some 'shooters' out there), and Wrecking Crew is the dictionary definition of mindless fun.

I could go on for a lot longer here, but I'll just say that hopefully this thread causes even more positive word of mouth for the game, because it deserves it. If anyone is reading this and is on the fence about buying it ... don't be anymore. Just get it.

Yeah.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 3:23PM Tephlon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. This was actually the first thing I can think of that had the demo work for it correctly and 'as it's supposed to'.

It seems like lately there are alot of games that come out with demos too late, or just plain make them shitty and a horrible representation of what the game is or will be like. (Bionic Commando comes to mind).

I loved the first Red Faction, but found the second to be subpar. Then I played the SP demo. LOVED IT. Then i played the MP demo. LOVED IT. Then I saw the trailers/ads on XBL with Mac talking about the weapons (the 'Tools of Destruction' series). LOOOVVED IT.

Then I was hooked. Bought the game and haven't looked back. Freaking love it. I talked so much about it, that my friends started to get annoyed at my talking about it.
I got so pissed at their laziness in downloading and playing the demos, that I went out and bought copies of the game for them. (yes, I like it that much)

Now I have people to play MP with, and I have to say it's fan-fucking-tastic.

I recommend it to anyone. Ohhh, and "Why not the LS7" or whatever the hell your name is... stop bitching about this game. It's not too hard, you're just doing it wrong.

That is all.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 4:10PM The Pork said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Teph - do you have it for 360 or PS3?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2009 6:31PM Tephlon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, sorry for replying so late.

I've been out of town for a week or so.

I've got it for the 360.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2009 2:49PM Assmar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps they have another half-chance with the PC release. I've been eying that Steam page for the day it goes on sale for pre-loading. We've seen the sales spikes when Valve decides to give crazy discounts on old titles, but if this game launches at $35 or even $30 there could be server crashing business for THQ.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2009 4:10AM pulgathagreat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hell yeah this game could of done a lot better that shit was, not was is one of the baddest mothafucking games out now. not many games tickle my pickle on the ps3 but this does
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW