| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (62)

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:11AM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe 'banning' is the wrong word for it... it should be re-labeled as a 'challenge'!

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:57AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What is that even supposed to mean?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:34AM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe they are just sick of all the WW2 games that have people killing germans
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they shouldn't have started shit, and made it so interesting.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:13AM JXCGunrunna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ironic coming out of Germany, the country that is home to H&K who makes some of the best weapons in the world and the country who killed so many people and almost took over europe.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:17AM Jamp said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think the point is pretty much to get rid of that image among other things.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Jampirow: Makes sense
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Germany; they love being Nazis about not being Nazis.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:16AM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
funny how germany gets so much shit for trying to take over the world. yet no one ever gives england, spain and france any shit for succeeding in taking over the world.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:58AM MarioGreat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Paul

Noticed the difference? Those other countries 'succeeded'. Remember, the winner writes history.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Jampirow: No, that's actually a reaction to a recent school shooting with 15 dead and 11 wounded.

Once more, computer games were blamed as they are a convenient target for idiotic politician.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:26AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funny how the most likely cause of these school shootings is the one which is never blamed - the other kids.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Paul and @MarioSpitza

Well maybe that's because there's no one currently alive who survived a genocide by France, Spain, or England. Okay, well maybe England.

But the real question is why do we still ignore all the genocides that have happened since Germany?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history#1951_to_2000

On another note, I do agree with the statement Jimiisama said about how Germany loves "being Nazis about not being Nazis." They try so hard to get rid of their image, that they start creating all these rules banning offensive things. Which is, in itself, fascist.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:59PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait (in the unfortunately ironic way) for when school shootings go up in Germany because the kids have fewer ways to blow off steam. I guess someone had to be the scapegoat for the case study. Apparently "idle hands are the devil's tools" doesn't translate into German.

Also, to the Baron: +1
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:32PM Kodros said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I think the point is pretty much to get rid of that image among other things."

Yeah, because Germany doing things to the extreme has worked out so well for them in the past.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 5:13PM Robot Overlord said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:14AM 216 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow that'll ban most games cept for like...Tetris and umm

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:54AM Gibbeynator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Tetris will be banned under the "absolutely no nazi imagery" clause, because the L-block looks like 1/4 of a swastika.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:14AM Bowser Rogozhin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crytek have a point, this is a stupid law from the nanniest state in Europe. It's unjustifiable legislation and I fear the Merkel administration and her coaltion of backwards Christians may push their forlorn agenda across the continent.

However, maybe if Crytek's portfolio wasn't so creatively bankrupt then they wouldn't be forced into the position of making sabre rattling statements.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:21AM Geist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yes, only Crytek makes violent games exclusively. Not like id! Or Epic! Or, you know, 80% of game developers everywhere.

It's a stupid law, period.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:25AM Bowser Rogozhin said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Yes, only Crytek makes violent games exclusively. Not like id! Or Epic! Or, you know, 80% of game developers everywhere."

You're right. Gaming is at a real low ebb at the moment.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:32AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crysis introduced a lot of unique concepts, and while it was generic in plot, characters and writing, it made up for it in the open-world action aspects.

I know you hate everything which isn't a high-concept indie platformer, Bowser, but sometimes you should admit that some games are less crap than others.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:35AM RobS the 3rd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's like Rock and Roll and Comic books, a group of people has latched onto it as the cause of societies problems and are fighting it so they get a feeling of doing good for the poor little children.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 4:14PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's about as likely as this law being passed Baron. HIYO!!
No wait, shit!
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:30AM StormEagle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Zut Geist!

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:32AM SCV said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What an idiotic law. It may be wrong to kill people, but it certainly isn't wrong to kill pixel'd terrorists or robots.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:37AM xThePunisherx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
or Fallout Survivors ^_^
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:58AM McBrick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those freakin' Raiders have it comin', I'm telling you.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:37AM McBrick said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"You're right. Gaming is at a real low ebb at the moment."

That was sarcasm, right? Because there are probably more non-violent games available right now than ever before, and not just because there are more games, period. Guitar Hero? Rock Band? Wii whatever? And that's just the commercially successful stuff; what about Flower, Pixel Junk Eden, Maw, Braid, etc. etc.? If you can't find a good non-graphically violent game today it's not that you're not trying very hard - you're not trying, period.

Anyone who is really concerned about violent videogames needs to look at his own game shelf and determine what they're buying, then decide if the devs are simply making what people will buy. Fortunately most of the top sellers for any given month are non-violent Wii games or Rock Hero X; take those away and it's Gears of War, God of War, Fallout 3, COD4, Halo 3, Resident Evil 5, etc. Good games, all - I don't have my panties in a twist about violence in games but to say that gaming is at a low is ridiculous, and to blame developers even moreso. Stop buying violent games and they will stop making them, I promise. There are tons of other options available.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:51AM LuTon James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You sir have said it all. Plus 1 to you.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:48PM Mazrael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guitar Hero kills it's own genre..

Although.., that's Neversoft for you..
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2009 9:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That fat bastard has a point
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Feuer frei!

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:45AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess Germany wants to Distance itself as far as possible from anything that could lead to Holocaust games....

http://video.canadiancontent.net/43720662-family-guy-german-tour.html

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, that's only yet another misdirected attempt to stop school shootings.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:29PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea cause we all know their were no school shooting before Video games....

oh wait...
http://mm.news-record.com/legacy/indepth/06/williegrimes/grimes.html
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dumm deutsche Regierung Schisekopfs

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:57AM Clownzilla said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So Germany is trying to forget their violent fascist past by creating a non-violent fascist future.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:10AM freaparn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, if it ain't broken...
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:20PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well it's gonna take a lot of work to get rid of that image. But as they say: "Arbeit macht frei".
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:04AM benheck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's times like these when gamers are probably glad to live in America, where things don't get banned, just taxed and restricted to death. (but not banned)

Germany is the world's 3rd biggest economy if I am not mistaken, so taking that market away from game developers is kind of a big deal.

Sure I enjoyed stuff like Braid, played Tetris to death, but I'd still rather play Call of Duty or Fallout 3 most of the time.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:29AM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NICHT GEIL!

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:57AM BorgMorgue said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not horny?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:44AM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
geil does mean horny, but it's also slang for cool
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 5:54PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
affengeil?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the main concern is just the depiction of realistic killing. Killing robots isnt realistic killing. We're talking stuff like Call of Duty i would guess?

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:02PM Clownzilla said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There should be no concern. I can understand (and support) age restrictions due to the vulnerability of developing children's minds but outright banning certain media is just plain wrong. If the freedom and rights of another person are not infringed upon (aka. actual murder) then how can playing these games be considered an illegal offense. No government has the right to tell their people what they can or can't play.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:36AM McWilly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The phrase "from one extreme to another" comes to mind.

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:26AM oOWallaceOo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EXTREME FEVER
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not to defend that idiotic law, but... shooters are "one of the most important cultural mediums of our future"????

Seriously? What has over culture come down to?

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW