Crytek's CEO is expressing serious concern over the German bill currently making its way around the Bundestag that would ban games "where the main part is to realistically play the killing of people or other cruel or un-human acts of violence against humans or manlike characters." So, you know, most of the fun stuff.
CEO Cevat Yerli expressed in a statement that a ban on action games was "like banning the German artists that create them." He continued, "If the German creative community can't effectively participate in one of the most important cultural mediums of our future, will we be forced to relocate to other countries?"
Considering Crytek is probably the most well-known German developer, it wouldn't exactly be in the country's best interest if the firm left.
Reader Comments (62)
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:11AM Wiizer said
Maybe 'banning' is the wrong word for it... it should be re-labeled as a 'challenge'!
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:31PM (Unverified) said
Maybe they shouldn't have started shit, and made it so interesting.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:13AM JXCGunrunna said
Ironic coming out of Germany, the country that is home to H&K who makes some of the best weapons in the world and the country who killed so many people and almost took over europe.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:22AM (Unverified) said
Germany; they love being Nazis about not being Nazis.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:58AM MarioGreat said
@Paul
Noticed the difference? Those other countries 'succeeded'. Remember, the winner writes history.
Reply
Noticed the difference? Those other countries 'succeeded'. Remember, the winner writes history.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:04AM (Unverified) said
@ Jampirow: No, that's actually a reaction to a recent school shooting with 15 dead and 11 wounded.
Once more, computer games were blamed as they are a convenient target for idiotic politician.
Reply
Once more, computer games were blamed as they are a convenient target for idiotic politician.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:21PM (Unverified) said
@Paul and @MarioSpitza
Well maybe that's because there's no one currently alive who survived a genocide by France, Spain, or England. Okay, well maybe England.
But the real question is why do we still ignore all the genocides that have happened since Germany?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history#1951_to_2000
On another note, I do agree with the statement Jimiisama said about how Germany loves "being Nazis about not being Nazis." They try so hard to get rid of their image, that they start creating all these rules banning offensive things. Which is, in itself, fascist.
Reply
Well maybe that's because there's no one currently alive who survived a genocide by France, Spain, or England. Okay, well maybe England.
But the real question is why do we still ignore all the genocides that have happened since Germany?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history#1951_to_2000
On another note, I do agree with the statement Jimiisama said about how Germany loves "being Nazis about not being Nazis." They try so hard to get rid of their image, that they start creating all these rules banning offensive things. Which is, in itself, fascist.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:59PM aristokrat said
I can't wait (in the unfortunately ironic way) for when school shootings go up in Germany because the kids have fewer ways to blow off steam. I guess someone had to be the scapegoat for the case study. Apparently "idle hands are the devil's tools" doesn't translate into German.
Also, to the Baron: +1
Reply
Also, to the Baron: +1
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 5:13PM Robot Overlord said
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:14AM 216 said
wow that'll ban most games cept for like...Tetris and umm
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:54AM Gibbeynator said
Tetris will be banned under the "absolutely no nazi imagery" clause, because the L-block looks like 1/4 of a swastika.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:14AM Bowser Rogozhin said
Crytek have a point, this is a stupid law from the nanniest state in Europe. It's unjustifiable legislation and I fear the Merkel administration and her coaltion of backwards Christians may push their forlorn agenda across the continent.
However, maybe if Crytek's portfolio wasn't so creatively bankrupt then they wouldn't be forced into the position of making sabre rattling statements.
However, maybe if Crytek's portfolio wasn't so creatively bankrupt then they wouldn't be forced into the position of making sabre rattling statements.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:25AM Bowser Rogozhin said
"Yes, only Crytek makes violent games exclusively. Not like id! Or Epic! Or, you know, 80% of game developers everywhere."
You're right. Gaming is at a real low ebb at the moment.
Reply
You're right. Gaming is at a real low ebb at the moment.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:32AM Haggard said
Crysis introduced a lot of unique concepts, and while it was generic in plot, characters and writing, it made up for it in the open-world action aspects.
I know you hate everything which isn't a high-concept indie platformer, Bowser, but sometimes you should admit that some games are less crap than others.
Reply
I know you hate everything which isn't a high-concept indie platformer, Bowser, but sometimes you should admit that some games are less crap than others.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:35AM RobS the 3rd said
It's like Rock and Roll and Comic books, a group of people has latched onto it as the cause of societies problems and are fighting it so they get a feeling of doing good for the poor little children.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 4:14PM TheDarkWayne said
That's about as likely as this law being passed Baron. HIYO!!
No wait, shit!
Reply
No wait, shit!
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:30AM StormEagle said
Zut Geist!
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:32AM SCV said
What an idiotic law. It may be wrong to kill people, but it certainly isn't wrong to kill pixel'd terrorists or robots.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:37AM McBrick said
"You're right. Gaming is at a real low ebb at the moment."
That was sarcasm, right? Because there are probably more non-violent games available right now than ever before, and not just because there are more games, period. Guitar Hero? Rock Band? Wii whatever? And that's just the commercially successful stuff; what about Flower, Pixel Junk Eden, Maw, Braid, etc. etc.? If you can't find a good non-graphically violent game today it's not that you're not trying very hard - you're not trying, period.
Anyone who is really concerned about violent videogames needs to look at his own game shelf and determine what they're buying, then decide if the devs are simply making what people will buy. Fortunately most of the top sellers for any given month are non-violent Wii games or Rock Hero X; take those away and it's Gears of War, God of War, Fallout 3, COD4, Halo 3, Resident Evil 5, etc. Good games, all - I don't have my panties in a twist about violence in games but to say that gaming is at a low is ridiculous, and to blame developers even moreso. Stop buying violent games and they will stop making them, I promise. There are tons of other options available.
That was sarcasm, right? Because there are probably more non-violent games available right now than ever before, and not just because there are more games, period. Guitar Hero? Rock Band? Wii whatever? And that's just the commercially successful stuff; what about Flower, Pixel Junk Eden, Maw, Braid, etc. etc.? If you can't find a good non-graphically violent game today it's not that you're not trying very hard - you're not trying, period.
Anyone who is really concerned about violent videogames needs to look at his own game shelf and determine what they're buying, then decide if the devs are simply making what people will buy. Fortunately most of the top sellers for any given month are non-violent Wii games or Rock Hero X; take those away and it's Gears of War, God of War, Fallout 3, COD4, Halo 3, Resident Evil 5, etc. Good games, all - I don't have my panties in a twist about violence in games but to say that gaming is at a low is ridiculous, and to blame developers even moreso. Stop buying violent games and they will stop making them, I promise. There are tons of other options available.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:42AM (Unverified) said
Feuer frei!
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:45AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
I guess Germany wants to Distance itself as far as possible from anything that could lead to Holocaust games....
http://video.canadiancontent.net/43720662-family-guy-german-tour.html
http://video.canadiancontent.net/43720662-family-guy-german-tour.html
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:15AM (Unverified) said
No, that's only yet another misdirected attempt to stop school shootings.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:29PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
yea cause we all know their were no school shooting before Video games....
oh wait...
http://mm.news-record.com/legacy/indepth/06/williegrimes/grimes.html
Reply
oh wait...
http://mm.news-record.com/legacy/indepth/06/williegrimes/grimes.html
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:46AM (Unverified) said
Dumm deutsche Regierung Schisekopfs
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:57AM Clownzilla said
So Germany is trying to forget their violent fascist past by creating a non-violent fascist future.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 12:20PM Pure Black World Tendency said
Well it's gonna take a lot of work to get rid of that image. But as they say: "Arbeit macht frei".
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:04AM benheck said
It's times like these when gamers are probably glad to live in America, where things don't get banned, just taxed and restricted to death. (but not banned)
Germany is the world's 3rd biggest economy if I am not mistaken, so taking that market away from game developers is kind of a big deal.
Sure I enjoyed stuff like Braid, played Tetris to death, but I'd still rather play Call of Duty or Fallout 3 most of the time.
Germany is the world's 3rd biggest economy if I am not mistaken, so taking that market away from game developers is kind of a big deal.
Sure I enjoyed stuff like Braid, played Tetris to death, but I'd still rather play Call of Duty or Fallout 3 most of the time.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:29AM eat it said
NICHT GEIL!
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:32AM (Unverified) said
I think the main concern is just the depiction of realistic killing. Killing robots isnt realistic killing. We're talking stuff like Call of Duty i would guess?
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:02PM Clownzilla said
There should be no concern. I can understand (and support) age restrictions due to the vulnerability of developing children's minds but outright banning certain media is just plain wrong. If the freedom and rights of another person are not infringed upon (aka. actual murder) then how can playing these games be considered an illegal offense. No government has the right to tell their people what they can or can't play.
Reply
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:36AM McWilly said
The phrase "from one extreme to another" comes to mind.
Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:04AM (Unverified) said
Not to defend that idiotic law, but... shooters are "one of the most important cultural mediums of our future"????
Seriously? What has over culture come down to?
Seriously? What has over culture come down to?
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM





