| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (27)

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
telling y'all it sabotoge...
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:12PM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The answer to this:

"Did you take any of that into consideration in Part 2? It must be frustrating to work on an episodic game when the first installment gets a lot of negative feedback. How did the team handle that?"

Total BS... As I was reading it, I was expecting him to say we tweaked something or we heard about it, but the team did nothing with the feedback?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:17PM OMGOMG said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. Our game didn't suck, you people just didn't get it. Please. The game was shit, plain and simple.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:25PM Jrinswand said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They were also completely unwilling to accept the fact that the first Watchmen game (and, presumably, each individual member of the development team) sucked.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey guys,

I need to tell you something.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:35PM helava said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jrinswand - Your assumption that because a game sucked, each individual member of the development team sucked, is incredibly naive and ill-informed.

There are a lot of reasons a game can go bad - everything from "everyone on the team sucking" to "incompetent upper management" to "being tied to the release schedule of a film." Sometimes unforseen events occur, sometimes you're bound by various restrictions that are beyond your control, and you have to do the best with what you have.

There are often very, very talented people on bad games, and very, very untalented people on good ones. Yes, they made a bad game - but are they all bad developers? Almost certainly not.

* Not affiliated with WBIE or the Watchmen game in any way whatsoever.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:40PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Either way, it was a bad game, and they had the chance to tweak the sequel after realizing they made a bad game, but they instead chose to pretend that their game wasn't bad in the first place.

But I agree that it's pretty hyperbolic to say that everyone involved with the game sucked. Just look at those purdy graphics.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 8:53PM Pika132 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I liked it.

I mean, I didn't exactly think it was the video game equivalent of the film, but who could resist beating people as Rorschach?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:06PM shiftplusone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I thought the game was fun. Not a lot of content but it's purely a brawler, sort of like a modern day final fight. It worked pretty well
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:00PM Twist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow someone in the marketing department has their hand shoved up this socks puppets butt all the way to the elbow. Let me guess, was this "interview" done via email? In the interest of journalistic integrity I think from now on the interview method should be disclosed.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pardon me; where the fuck is Multiplayer for Episode 1?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's there.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Online multiplayer? Since when? c.c
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 9:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kind of surprised these guys even talked to you considering how harsh you were on their 1st game.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:31PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i enjoyed it, i didnt think it was bad. Sure it was repetitive, but what beat em up isnt?
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 12:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked it. I think the price being so high hurt it in the reviews department. But for what they set out to do, like the guy says in the interview, I think they achieved it. Also I think it is one of the best looking XBLA games, if that means anything.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 10:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Ugh...

I just rented this movie on blue-ray. I dont know why people praise it so much, the action was great when there was some, but it was few and far between. The movie to me seemed one long daytime soap opera with endless chatter, with small tidbits of action packed goodness strewn around at random. kudos to those of you who liked it, but Im glad i didnt waste my money at the theater.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:51PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
explosions are the only thing that matters
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 12:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you putting us on?
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 1:12AM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Psst.

It's not fucking Die Hard.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 1:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what, I honestly think this movie only appeals to those who read the comic. I fully understand why people thought it was boring, but I only saw the movie to see how the adaptation turned out and it didn't disappoint
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 11:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is how mediocre games get onto the market? The developers genuinely liked the crappy game, what a revelation!
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 7:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think this should not be taken over by the PS owner that is Sony because this game has its own value and and i personally don't want PS to curse its name on this game..........
http://www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 12:23PM commonperson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow! That's the most impressive example of corprate toolery I've seen in my life and I worked at Big Blue! I stopped three sentences in to the Watchmen Director's Cut question. I mean he was speaking nonsense. It was like watching President Bush's press secretary trying to back out of a statement that the president said the day before just utter crap buzzwords and double speak. This is why I hate press crap. I mean when you sit there and talk for five minutes and don't utter a single word of useful information that's when you should just stop. It'd make people a whole lot less angry and more likely to buy the next game, honestly with this double speak I'm probably not going to waste my dollars on this game when there are so many options out there. And this is coming from a person who actually didn't mind and kinda liked the first on of these games.
Reply

Posted: Aug 10th 2009 11:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was just playing the arkham asylum demo, and was thinking this is the brawler watchmen should have been.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2009 11:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously!
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 1:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GAH
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW