| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (25)

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:07PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If DSG was in this game, no one would have a problem with it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:29PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is she in the picture and I can't Where's Waldo her or something?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:10PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yes, it would have been possible to make a serious, provocative video game about Fallujah.

No, that's not what this asshat was doing. From all of the published previews, he was making a generic shoot-em-up and trying to cash in on the tragic deaths of young soldiers and Iraqi civilians.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:18PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
+1 on intelligence.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:28PM s ls said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We have a million WW2 games so how is this any different from those games?

Please answer me that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Solace: WWII is over since 1945. The Iraq War is basically not.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:35PM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Last time I checked, WW2 was a historical event, not something that's still going on.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Last time I checked, those "6 days in Fallujah" are a historical event. The "war" may be ongoing if you can even call it that anymore, but the battle of Fallujah is in the past.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:07PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tell that to the victims families & other survivors still living with trama. Ithink they might see it differently..
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's fine, they don't have to buy it. No one is holding a gun to anyone's head telling them they have to play.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:11PM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, you have a point there. But the 6 days of Fallujah game (from what they've said in interviews) is supposed to follow the whole thing very very accurately, even going so far as using the actual names of soldiers of the squads they were in.

I don't know of any WWII games that did that. Sure there were some key characters that did exist in real life (General Amsel, for example). There are also alot of people still grieving about the tragic events that occured there, I think it's a bit tasteless to start exploiting this so shortly after said events.

That's just my two cents, though. We've been through this every time this game gets brought up.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know and I love arguing about it. I don't know why but I do.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its not an exploit. Just because it was recent means nothing. After all, the fallen did die so that we could be free to speak our minds, whether it be to make a point or to tell a story.

The names are no big issue, as long as they got permission to use them.

Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 6:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
copa watch this video, especially around the 1:45 mark. I really don't think this is your average shooter and would have done something new and different.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_ULc9YtWmM&NR=1
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:14PM Eminemdrdre00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This sucks, it looked like it was going to be a really cool game!
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you but I still have hope. Hey wasn't there a rumor about the next Medal of Honor game taking place in Afghanistan?

Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How many good/bad movies/TV have been made about ww2 and vietnam? How many have edited/altered historical fact and tossed in a good dose of fiction?

Make a video game about it and it's national news, game companies dropping a almost fully completed product as a result. Politcal groups making statements, it's on FOX News....

Games are starting to cost as much as movies to make, they have a rating system like movies do but are put under a far larger microscope then film.

Whats amazing is the same people who would get on TV and defend a movies right to be released, argue it and protest for freedom of speech are the ones that go after video games quite often.

I have 0 interest in playing this game, I just don't see what on earth everyone is so up in arms about. If a book came out about Fallujah that twisted with facts and such I don't think anyone focusing on this game would even know the book existed or care.

Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:36PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can't interact with a book or a film. That's the controversy. This game puts an individual into a war that's recent by most standards. It gives players a chance to interact with a battle people are still suffering over. I assume that's how the developers or controversy makers see it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That and people still think video games are for kids, it is not an accepted form of adult media like books and movies. Add in the interactive element and people lose their shit over it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ whylecat:

.....So what?
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 4:13PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ drew

soo you're retarded. That's the fact of the situation. Books/movies can only be watched/read. You can't interact to change the outcome. That's just the way it is buddy. Well, at least until someone invents that interactive comic book that Tom Hanks designed in BIG.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 1:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What I don't get about this whole SDiF thing is: Atomic Games is to 100% a subsidary of Destineer. And Destineer is a frigging publisher!

If they *really* want to make that game, why the frell doesn't Destineer publish it? They have published all of Atomic Game's titles, including the very similar Close Combat: First to Fight.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is a little odd, I wonder why they don't do it themselves.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 4:00PM emirabal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My question is we ahve all these movies about Iraq and the war and no one is protesting those, what makes this game so different than those movies, interaction, i dont see that as a plausible reason. Im sorry, release this game and then we can judge, until then, we are all speculating.

Probably be the greatest game ever but we wouldnt know because it wont get released.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2009 4:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude I'm with you 100%.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW