| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (76)

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:06PM Drake Lake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Look at dat sand.

Seriously some nice texture work.

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And the best bit is that this is not a set piece shot, but the whole game should be textured like that. That's what the big hoopla is about.

They mentioned unique texturing before but it didn't look so good, now it seems the texture artists have really gone to town with it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 2:10AM xaduurv said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Dude, screw your sand. LOOK AT THOSE CLOUDS!!

Seriously though, this is shaping up to be an absolutely GORGEOUS game. Move over Crysis (finally!)
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 2:52AM Shagittarius said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Too bad it can't do widescreen.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 2:12PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You guys sure have no sense of humor...all the screenshots are 4:3...don't you get it...sigh...

If you must know, I'm not hating I think the visuals are absolutely amazing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Lookin forward to seeing it in Elder Scrolls V/Fallout 4!

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:05AM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What makes you think Bethesda will use this engine? Not that I don't want them to, but I believe they used their own engine for Elder Scrolls and Fallout 3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 8:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've played so many hours between oblivion and fallout, at least 1,000, it would probably feel weird not having bad character animation. Besides, I doubt you could have that kind of graphical detail while having all the content those games had. On current consoles anyway. I call it the law of GTA, it's the content to graphics ratio.
Reply

Posted: Aug 10th 2009 5:42AM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ditto. Just imagining a Bethesda RPG with graphics like that makes me...oh dear
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:07PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sky is nice. very realistic. oooh. aaaah.

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:09PM McWilly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah those god rays look epic. Shame about the water (If that is water).
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:18PM ai3rocks57 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. The top of the pictures look real. The bottom however..eh. Still looks like it would be amazing to play on any HDTV

~~
http://bit.ly/f5cyp
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:06AM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My reply was to tmac, first time comment system fucked me over.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:42AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nerdy Desi

Bethesda licenses the Gamebyro engine, Warhammer Online also uses it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 10:06AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ZeniMax bought id a few weeks ago. Bethesda is also owned by ZeniMax. Hence tmac's comment.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:11PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oooooh, aaaaahhhhh, it sparkles....

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:12PM DangerMouse001 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm trying not to get my hopes up too high, but this game is looking great so far. Hopefully some new footage or trailers will show up during quakecon.

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:55AM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After Doom 3 and Quake 4 they really have nowhere to go but up. Rage is at least a lot more interesting than either of those so hopefully it'll turn out pretty well.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it.

When shots and VIDEO of Doom3 came out everyone was claiming they were fake and prerendered. When it came out, everyone said it looked ugly.

Me thinks they're just haters. I for once enjoyed Doom3, a scary and engrossing experience, which surprisingly ran in a lot of hardware as opposed to crysis which was also gorgeous but ran in like a single machine in the whole world at launch >_<

Multiplayer sucked in Doom3 (it was there but it was waaay too simple) but the campaign was full of win (and full of "HOLY SHIT").
And then there's the coop mod :D
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 6:40AM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually Doom 3 looked really good when it came out. I'm talking about how fun the game was to play. I was a longtime fan of Doom I and II, and Doom III was completely different. It focused a lot more on silly predictable scare tactics and a lot less on run and gun action, featured a lot more tiny dark corridors and a lot less big open crazy arenas, and felt more like a straight up horror game than an FPS. Add in silly PDA files and a lack of the really awesome soundtrack that fueled the original Doom, and you have a dissapointment. Not to say that Doom 3 was a particularly terible game, it just wasn't the sequel I was looking forward to.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 8:50AM Frith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
CaramelZappa, is that a Doom 3 screenshot you're using as your avatar?
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 9:39AM waynski1457 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you CaramelZappa. I'm glad to see other people who share that opinion.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 9:44AM DangerMouse001 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doom 3 wasn't a bad game, but it was all the tiny problems with the game play that bugged the crap out of me. Ridiculous spread on the shot gun, empty sound effects, run-up-and-hold-fire-button-till someone-dies gameplay are just of a few of the problems i had. it was just aggravating to play when it should've been much better.

But when Doom 3 came out it was the new engine that everyone was talking about. But that same year before Doom 3 came out, Epic released their video of UE3 which blew the id tech 4 out of the water. I wonder if we'll see a repeat of that in the near future.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:16PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see lots of good texture work here, but that's about it. I couldn't possibly be the only one who is underwhelmed by these screenshots, could I?

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:24PM vmenge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes you can :P

or not.

I dunno, the last time a screenshot impressed me this much was a few years ago when the first Doom 3 shots came out...
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:26PM AoE said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Marty, perhaps you'd like to share with the class which game or game engine you've seen that is on-par or better than this? That way you won't be the only underwhelmed one of us.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
color me unimpressed as well. From these screen shots at least, there is nothing amazing to be seen. Seeing some actual gameplay might be a different story, but from these screens and the 'trailer' that was released forever ago, tech 5 doesn't look any better than ue3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:36PM vmenge said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Filter,

You're blind.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:50PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AoE

http://www.bungie.net/images/Games/Halo3/Screenshots/h3_ChiefJungle_0706.jpg

It's not so much the engine I don't like as much as it is the artistic direction they went with.

The sky looks great sure, but to me the rest just seems like something you'd see in a futuristic space movie that takes place on a barren wasteland. It's cool in a certain way, but I'd have preferred more splashes of color and varied landscapes.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:51PM atrimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
while "underwhelmed" might be too strong a word, i certainly see what you're saying. the game's not ugly by any stretch of the imagination, but there are certain PS360 exclusives that i won't *ahem* Convicted Among Thieves *ahem* that have sorta set the bar on consoles. these RAGE screens haven't really approached (let alone crossed) that bar.

still, i can't wait to see (and play) the finished product.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:58PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AoE

Uh, CryEngine 2/3?

The textures here, though very nice and detailed in parts somehow strike me as being a bit 'uncanny valley', whatever that means. And I'm fairly sure those God Rays will be painted onto that sky.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:13AM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The engine isn't ugly but isn't really impressing me either, maybe I need some higher resolution screenshots to tell.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:38AM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@sonicspike41,

The screenshot you submitted isn't great if you're trying to back up the underwhelmed viewpoint, take a look at those trees with the awful texture work and easily visible geometry. Based on the rest of your comment, it sounds like you're speaking more to the art style than any technical abilities in the engine.

@The Baron,

CryEngine 3 I have not seen enough of to argue the point; CryEngine 2 though? You're daft. As for the god rays? I couldn't say for certain either; but considering Namco's able to pull them off for Tekken 6, I somehow doubt it would be an impossible task for ID... and knowing how important lighting is to them, I'd wager they are dynamic and not merely painted into the skybox.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:13AM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The textures are amazing but it feels to me like iD has been focusing on nothing but textures since Quake Wars. The environments look fantastic, but judging from the trailer they released a while ago the characters and the lighting look not much better than Doom 3. And while Doom 3 looked great at the time, it's not as cutting edge right now.

Don't get me wrong, the game looks beautiful, but I just feel like it could be better.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:27AM seemoneh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm agreeing with the marty. Not sure what's off. Just doesn't blow me away like I expected. The featured screen just doesn't look great. Probably due to the character model or something. Weird.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 11:21AM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AoE - The landscapes in Unreal Tournament 3 or Fallout 3 look just as good, in my opinion, albeit with a little bit less texture fidelity.

Any engine out there can render a sky box with light rays coming from it.

I just don't find myself particularly impressed. Not as impressed as I was for the jump between Quake 3 and Doom 3. Maybe I'll change my mind when I see it in motion, but for now, it just looks a lot like many other games on the market.
Reply

Posted: Aug 8th 2009 7:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still think that project-offset's engine is the best. http://www.projectoffset.com . However, they might get butchered by Intel buying them out. Intel wants it to run on their new processor. Which might vary well destroy the game (Seeing how horrible intel drivers are (1 gig for wireless and 1 gig of memory for video tells me somethings wrong)).
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 7:31PM jackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AoE,

I fail to see how Marty's daft for using Cryengine2 as a way to measure his slight disappointment in what iD's been presenting with their latest engine and game. Of the four games currently using it (Merchants of Brooklyn, Crysis Wars, Crysis Warhead, Crysis), the latter are still visually unrivaled even when below Very High settings when compared to other games using different engines.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30843645@N04/3343396583/sizes/l/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30843645@N04/3344230246/sizes/l/
http://crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=51339

Compared to those two captures I took in game or eFFe's work with the Cryengine2 sandbox editor at Crymod, I'm not overly impressed with what I've thus far seen in RAGE or iD Tech 5.



This is a product of someone tinkering around in the Cryengine 2 Sandbox editor.

Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 7:53PM jackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FFS, someone please remind me to actually not hurriedly write a post before a social engagement. If there's one thing I absolutely can't tolerate, it's unintentionally writing like an imbecile with an elementary school command over my vocabulary, spelling, and grammar.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:24PM AoE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
lololol, +10 for "click to enrage"

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 12:29AM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@WINterfang,

quit being a humorless old codger. As for not being able to upvote pics? I submit to you: http://digg.com/images and http://www.reddit.com/r/pics clearly there are places where you can. What no WINterfang? WHAT NOW?
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks great. I'm still waiting for someone to create an engine that can make realistic waves when they hit solid objects.It does look great when they just disappear when they hit it.

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game looks very pretty. I also like running around futuristic places.

Wow, this is perfect then!

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Holy f*ck, that's pretty.

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The idTech5 logo I mean, the game looks like horseshit.
Reply

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And to think, id Tech 4 couldn't do decent outdoor to save a puppy's life. This looks amazing, and kudos to whomever mentioned Elder Scrolls. That would be perfect!

Posted: Aug 6th 2009 11:36PM Accessgranted said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*drops jaw* I love it! love love love it! reminds me of Resident Evil Extinction kinda.

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 1:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How can you love it, then?
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2009 3:06PM Accessgranted said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well let's see... I loved Extinction's deserty environment and I like this games deserty environment... let's put two and two together and say I am fond of deserty environments!
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW