| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (34)

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 5:22AM koehler83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did anyone else notice that the presenters specifically mentioned Modern Warfare 2 but never mentioned MAG? Seems funny to me. Isn't Bad Company 2 more in competition with MAG than Call of Duty? Especially given the release dates for both.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:58PM Chopper731 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No. MAG is an online only game and given the game play, its main competitor is going to be SOCOM: Confrontation and maybe a Tom Clancy game if one comes out.

BF:BC2 is a direct competitor with MW2. They both feature modern combat in both a single player story mode and online multiplayer.

I think MW2 will be a good game but I am MUCH more excited about Bad Company 2. Once you got destructible environment, it is hard to go back.
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 5:22AM koehler83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh I see. I had gathered from their presentation that it was online only. All the emphasis was on the multiplayer without a word mentioned regarding a single player. I only ever heard about the multiplayer component of BF:BC too.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 10:25PM glennc2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA want some of the CoD pie so they will make sure this games is as close to modern warfare as possible. and CoD wants to be more like Bad Company (just look at the preview vids). it is like they want to swap places. i would even bet that BC will have enemy respawning in single player and CoD won't.

i'll take BF (BC, 1943) over CoD any day of the week. it is a far far superior online experience than COD.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:19PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ludwig, I think you broke my brain.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:30PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it weird i knew he wrote the article even before i looked at the author. Infact i had already put it to his voice too.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:57PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering that "Wordplay" is the fourth word of the article? No, that's not weird that you knew that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 3:01PM phinn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Will be playing this on my new PS3 Slim suckaaaaaaaaas.

Or maybe get it for PC, I haven't decided, I'm just excited about the $299 120gb PS3 :-P
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:20PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Q1 is gonna be....as my boss calls it: "A clusterf**k".

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:24PM MarkHam006 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ludwig, couldn't you have put it in simpler terms for us? I'm still not sure what you mean.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:24PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is a God, and He has smiled upon me on this day!

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:25PM HeavyToka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Q1 is gonna break my bank and I'm gonna love it

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:25PM SpaceFox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why didn't you guys put up the new trailer from Gamescom?

http://vimeo.com/6161703

Game looks sweet!

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:35PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See, the thing about Battlefield trailers like that is that this crap actually happens. I've had experiences very close to this trailer and the previous one in the original Bad Company.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:54PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How the crap are all those videogame videos still alive on vimeo? I thought they raped and pillaged videogame videos off their site on first sight?
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love how these Joystiq guys can work and blow lines of cocaine simultaneously. WOO! YEH!! (nom nom nom..)

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This article made me want Bad Company 2 more than I did previously. Thanks Ludwig,

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
highlarious

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 12:58PM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
THIS IS GETTING STUPID!

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:35PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd always heard right from when it was announced that this would be a Q1 game, so at least it isn't changing really
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:25PM SuiXide said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yo Dawg, we herd you liek marching into battlefields so we put Battlefield in yo March so you can march in yo battlefeild while Battlefielding in March.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:41PM Ribs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was pumped, until they unveiled the removal of the Demolitions class from multiplayer. WTF? Destruction is the best part!

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:42PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Demolitions still exists, just in a different format. Judging from this trailer and previous trailers, plus the E3 gameplay, the Medic class also functions as Demolitions.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:47PM SpaceFox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They didn't remove Demolition. It's almost like Specialist and Demolition are combined classes now. You can have a SMG with a Rocket Launcher now, and you can even customize weapon sights.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 1:43PM Centaur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see what you did there.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 2:22PM acme64 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Q1, the new Q4

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 2:57PM phinn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait for this game, BC2 is gonna be awesome, best multiplayer FPS ever.

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 12:07PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree, it was surprisingly fun. I liked the tug-of-war mechanic.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 3:01PM Baalzak said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 3:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they fix the server issues because when i play bfbc it says connection to ea lost

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 5:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if they might have some servers up in OZ by then, i aint holding my breath, considering they were meant be putting them in for 1943 over a month ago i'd say we are gonna get screwed over yet again by DICE and EA. So whilst i like the battlefield games the online aspect of it will be unplayable just like BC and 1943.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 10:39PM glennc2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BC is perfectly playable. i have had no problems with it at all online. 1943 is greatly improved and now very playable. it just looks like you have to wait a month or 2 after each release before they iron out the kinks.

both games are the most fun i have had gaming ever. don't ignore such a great game because the first few months had teething probs, it is worth the wait.

oh yeah, i live in melbourne.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 7:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unfortunately DICE can't get voice chat working, as we've seen in the first one and again recently with BF1943 (for the PS3 version that is). Very disappointing to see that they haven't learned from their mistakes.

Both games are incredible, but I don't really play them much alone. And without voice chat, it pretty much defeats the purpose of playing with your friends; you might as well be alone.

What's a squad-based shooter worth without voice chat? Well, if you're a loner, you probably wouldn't mind, but otherwise it's such a waste. It's a shame too, because these are otherwise excellent games.

Bottom line, I won't be buying another multiplayer DICE game until they have the basics covered and prove their loyalty to their fans by patching up previous titles first.

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 10:30PM glennc2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
on live you can chat with friends in a party so this allows you to chat with friends in your squad. i would like proximity chat added though so you can speak to others in your team but not squad if they are close by (in vehicles).
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW