| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (17)

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:05PM StormEagle said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So much for being done with crappy movie tie-in games.

Then again, April is almost a year away....
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:34PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See told ya. Just cause some joker says so doesn't make it true.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:12PM dantebk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not saying X-Men Origins: Wolverine was the greatest video game I've ever played, but if they could make an Iron Man game as good as that one was then I'd be happy to play it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:37PM BustedChain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed on both points. While the Wolverine game wasn't spectacular, I did find that I had a lot of fun with it. I could see people getting bored with that game if they didn't really try all the different powers and combos. If they could make Iron Man that powerful and fluid in terms of attacking, that would be a definite win.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:12PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thank God for Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 6:13PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll stick with the other Iron Man 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 7:07PM Mayor West said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the demo for the first one... it sucked, but some of the basic concepts seemed like they could have been fixed and molded into a decent game. It's too bad that's probably not going to happen.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 7:27PM AnthonyGalindo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't the first game sell a lot of copies? Isn't that what being a hit means?
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 7:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think im probably the only person who enjoyed the first game. but it has to be said, seeing videos of the second over on gametrailers.com... it doesnt look much different at all. and yes, from what i can tell of it, the camera kinda sucks, and the gameplay look exactly the same as the first
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 9:50AM glamdringguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nope. I enjoyed it too FreekyWiggle. Wasn't amazing but it was fun. If they can fix the problems of the first game, it could end up amazing. But it needs to be free roaming. Which they so far haven't done.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 7:54PM VSpeck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sega not being able to deliver the goods? What a surprise.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 8:01PM agent55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Marvel should've had Capcom develop IM2 and then we would've had Dark Void's (supposedly) spot-on flying gameplay along with the flashy graphics. At least there's a cool Batman game a week away ;) There's hope for comic-based games yet!
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 8:26PM Onomah said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I heard that Matt Fraction was writing the story to this game. That's a definite plus right there
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2009 10:42PM The Lone Weasel said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Quick time events? Instantly not playing. I don't care what game it is, I can't stand QTEs anymore. There are too many good games out there to waste time pressing timed buttons to view a cutscene.
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 8:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Quick time events? Instantly not playing."

AGREED! That was literally the exact thought I had.
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2009 8:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
QTEs, On-rail sections, erratic camera and inability to lock on, topped off with those annoying "Hammer this button to not die" events.

Will there be *any* reason to buy this game?
Reply

Posted: Aug 21st 2009 6:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, on rail sections can be fun. But yeah, there sadly appears to be absolutely no reason to play this game.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW