| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (45)

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 5:55PM DerickDBrown said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Desert areas aren't the hook 'em type of screen shots I want to see right now. Those parts of games can be really good and atmospheric, but they aren't the parts that get a person excited to play.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:24PM Phylop said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I concur, Act 2 of Diablo II was certainly necessary filling and flavor for the game, but not a part that will make you salivate.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 12:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Act 2 of D2 was one of my favorites actually. Visually one of the most stimulating areas in diablo 2..
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 8:06AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loved the second act, with the exception of the pits (with the worms or slugs or whatever they were). It's definitely better than the first part of act 1 where you have to go through numerous generic caves.

I can see why they chose to show off the desert though; There are no rainbows.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:20AM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The third act was way more fun visually, it was only the monster abilities that kept people away.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really need to upgrade my PC so I can play this. D2 was a blast.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Barb should be more interesting to play this time, judging by how his skills seem to be handled.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 10:35AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm in a bad spot. I swore off PC gaming and said I wouldn't re-enter that realm, but damn I really want to play Diablo.

The wife will kill me if I say I am buying any new computer parts...
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
QUESTION:

Can it NOT end up like You-know-what?

You know, the one that took Forever?....
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Answer:

















What?
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:39PM DevilSei said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, did you forget what you were talking about?
Its Blizzard, they take forever for everything.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:40PM Durr Durrington said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not to worry, it will be some type of archer class (Ranger, Hunter, Amazon, etc) guaranteed.

I have to say, with the more info I hear about D3, the less excited I am about it. I played D2 for years and loved every minute of it but I can't help but get the feeling that D3 is going to be a letdown. With Activision involved (and Blizzard's success with WoW), I just feel like they are going to lose the essence of what made Diablo 2 so great in order to appeal to the WoW crowd.

Hopefully Blizzard can prove me wrong.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:43PM DevilSei said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So... they took out the "light your own mutt on fire" thing for fear that not every player wouldn't figure it out?

Seriously...?

You know how many players look up stuff on gamefaqs or other similar sites? You know how hard it would be not to learn that? Hell, whats it matter in the first place if not every person who makes a doctor doesn't figure it out? Let the people actually interested in learning more about their specific class take advantage of it, instead of some generic "summon zombie dog" spell that they'll most likely put in place of this.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:51PM bak said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling that Blizzard devs are doomed to hear the ultimate nit-picky-ness about this game in regard to skills and balance and such (lighting too haha). Gamers are picky. Gamers who loved a highly revered classic like D2 are REAL picky...

I'm picky too but I hope they don't sweat the pressure too much and come out with something that is over-thought and boring.

I guess I'm hoping they do the series justice but also make it their own game; not just D2 with prettier graphics.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i laughed a little about the boob jiggle.


Im glad they implemented a new loot system. That always bugged the hell out of me.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 10:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nice tidbits of information. It's always good to hear more about Diablo 3.

Well, almost. Don't get me wrong; I'm going to buy it the minute I can, and love it, but holy crap. I don't mind for an instant that a company take the time they need to get a game done right; no, not at all. But way back when Diablo 3 was announced, they said they had been working on it for four years. I haven't made a game before, but I know it doesn't take that long to make a quality product that's worth the money and lasts a long, long time. And that's just how long they've been at it when they announced the thing. They're not even pretending this game will see the light of day for years to come. They plan to string us along for another year just by revealing a freakin' class. "Remember Diablo 3? You still can't play it!" is all they're saying.

And their notion that you've gotta take every idea you have, write it down on a piece of paper and then stare at it until you burn a hole in it and then write down a better idea, gets dumber year by year. If it takes eight years thinking up ideas, crumpling them up and free-throwing them into the waste bin to find that one good idea that finally sticks and that you can run with, you've got high standards, but at some point it becomes obvious you're not very good at this. It's fantastic that, after all these years, your 235th fully-implemented and tested idea turned out to be great, but what's wrong with you that your first two-hundred and thirty-four ideas were garbage to be thrown away? At least you know what's good in the end, Blizzard, but if it's taking you this freakin' long, you don't have the foresight to know what won't work out until you've wasted your time.

Chalk it up to a development lifestyle of the rich and famous; they'll never have to worry about money again, so there are no deadlines and they can just play the game piece by piece until they get bored with something, gut it, and build in something new to play with. I'm glad they're having so much fun. Blizzard, just put out the ever-evolving and ever-shifting but ever-stagnant alpha versions of Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 right now for $15 a month and let us in on the party.

Speaking of which, World of Warcraft is the one thing they're doing right; they can't just avoid actually putting out new stuff for a decade like they do with their other projects, so cool things really do make appearances in reasonable timeframes. Why can't they just take the time they need to make Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 supurb, and not take much, much MORE time than they need? I'd be happier.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 8:15AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WoW is the reason for the delay. They take in so much money on WoW per month that they've got ten identical Scrooge McDuck-esque money pits to swim around in. Starcraft II and Diablo 3 are going to make them so much money that they may not have to make sequels for another ten years, so they don't feel any rush to get the game out.

I'm as frustrated as anyone else that the game isn't out yet. I mean...come on...the engine is clearly done (and has been for what? A year? Two years? More?). It seems to me that the only thing holding them back at this point is a content gridlock (they don't have all the spells nailed down yet....a year later....gahhhh)

Oh well...it will come out sooner or later
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:18AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very insightful, +1.

I love Blizzard's games but you're right.

Plus, you just KNOW within 2 months of Diablo 3's launch there will be a major patch that changes everything in the game anyway!
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2009 10:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unfortunately, yes. Yes to all of this.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 11:15PM Oldtaku said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And thank you Joystiq for being one of the few places on teh Interwebs that knows the difference between a hoard and a horde. You'd think WoW would help, but nooooooo.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2009 11:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"in some cases if you hit a baddie hard enough, you'll see its skeleton fly out of its body"

Jesus christ that sounds awesome! I'm also glad to hear about the new loot system, the biggest issue I have with loot games and MMOs is a fear of some asshole taking everything or ninjaing loot. Despite how easy it is to do it in WoW, surprisingly few people do it (I guess they don't like being blacklisted on the server).
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 12:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i honestly hope they don't ditch the paladin in favor of the monk... seems a little redundant to have two 'holy' classes, but I was a fervent hammerdin back in the day. If they do lose the paladin, I'm sure I'll survive.. but it will be missed.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:24AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Paladin will not be in the game. They're not going to have 3 melee classes, 2 magic classes, and 0 ranged classes.

At the least, the last class will be some kind of ranged and/or utility and/or pet/summmoner class. Something that isn't pure magic or pure beatdown.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 12:34AM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so, no hope for paladin returning.

That just sucks, really. Guess i'll be majoring the monk and lets see whats this new class is
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 2:03AM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Activision involved"

They just share wallets...sorta

Game wise they are pretty much separate companies.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 4:13AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully the last one is something like an Assassin/Rogue/Amazon/Palladin ...thing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 5:01AM Edawan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it's still at least a year away.

Damn...
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:09AM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I heard it will actually be released 2011 at the earliest.
:[
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I think Oct-Nov 2011 is a pretty accurate range. They've already told us that Star Craft 2 is likely to ship Q1 2010 (probably Jan-Feb). With that and their typical WoW release schedule in mind it is likely that Cataclysm, the new WoW expansion, will ship in Oct-Nov 2010 (giving Star Craft 2 a good 6-8 month buffer to insure that WoW doesn't hurt retail sales).

If Cataclysm does indeed come out in late 2010, it is highly likely that they will give it a wide release window as well. Therefore you shouldn't expect Diablo 3 until August 2011 at the very very earliest. Speaking from a marketing standpoint, Oct-Nov seems a little better to me because it's closer to the holiday season and it's around Halloween (a good launching point for a demonic-themed game).
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 8:23AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now for the question of the day... how is a barb going to PVP if he needs to down enemies in order to get the "Fury" needed to use whirlwind?

I'm not crazy about the new loot system either. What if the noob in your party gets epic loot but doesn't pick it up because he doesn't know what it is? Obviously you'll never know but...but.... a man needs his Silks of the Victor damnit!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:06AM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The quality of the loot is probably level-based and the fury meter might have a thing where the more hits you make the more it fills up or something.
At least I HOPE that's what will happen.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:33AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. The entire game is balanced for PvM and always was
2. This is how loot worked in Guild Wars and it worked fine. It took the fighting out of drops. In fact, when someone got epic loot it was fairly common that everyone else would just congratulate them or /clap for them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 9:42AM Danthok said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes boob physics! Diablo is now complete!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 9:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sorry i dont see how any of this relates to WOW. it looks like diablo to me... with just more diablo and updated graphics and hopefully less repetitive game play and duping.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 12:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It looks like the right camera for Diablo but the graphics are very cartoonish and really do look more like WoW than Diablo II. They've lost the gloom of the first two games and the detailed, crumbling textures. They may have added in gore, but gore doesn't set a game's tone.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 10:57AM AkumaFTW said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with Jimbo on this. Less excited the more they show me.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 11:01AM Van Faulk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jimbo

Obviously your emo ass needs to stop cutting yourself in the basement and stop complaining. Diablo 3 is perfect and blizzard would never do any wrong. You should be glad the game isn't impressing you now, because you are stupid. Go listen to simple plan.

Ahem. Sorry, i just felt I should get that out of the way since you'll be getting a lot of it. Suffice to say, i agree 100%. The new Diablo just seems to be WOW lite, with everything being dumbed down and casualized. And the new footage does not instill me with confidence. But why would Blizzard care about their old fans? They've got vast legions of new fans who will quite literally give them money for nothing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 12:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dont see how the gloom is any different. compare the desert to this one and they look similiar with alot less details that are bound to be put in (pots and stuff to break etc).

i think we are looking at an incomplete game.

maybe we just dont have the POS video cards we use to have.. .downgrade everyone and get out your CRT monitors for a darker, diablo experience.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 1:13PM Durr Durrington said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dr.House

I know that Activision isn't actually playing a part in the development of the game but I can't help but feeling that they will be in the background pulling strings to make sure the game appeals to as many people as possible. That isn't necessarily a bad thing but it can be if it is taken too far.

The fact that they are removing a cool feature (the ability to enhance the zombie dogs through use of your other skills) because people didn't know you could do it is exactly what I'm afraid of. What other features will be removed or dumbed down so that the game will be easier for the masses to understand?

Another thing that irritated me was when we learned that Monk's will be limited to using a few weapons. One of the great things about D2 was that the only limits on items were that you had enough of the corresponding stats. That gameplay feature allowed you to have all kinds of different class combination's that had varying degrees of success. Things like a melee Sorc seemed ridiculous but actually worked fairly well. If each class is limited to a few different weapon types that they are allowed to use, then it will really restrict the creativity of the players.

Anyways, enough negativity from me. The game will still be a day one purchase to me and I'll hopefully get years of enjoyment out of it like I did with Diablo 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 1:58PM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you're just being a worry bird.

They took out the zombie dog stuff, true. But that does not mean they won't let you use runes on them instead, or another means of customization. Blizzard has always gone back and forth between different ideas, it's just now that they have the money they can keep it in development longer. They said from day one that customization is going to be one of the main if not the main focus of the game. I know what you mean with the weapon restrictions, but they do that to keep the classes near what the class is supposed to be. Since the monk is a hand to hand fighter fist weapons make the most sense. I'm sure that will give some flexibility you will probably be able to use pole-arms, axes, and of course staffs when all is said and done.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 2:00PM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Excuse the grammar in my last post I just woke up.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2009 10:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait for D3 to come out. Really happy about the new loot system, was not looking forward to a massive click fest all over again.
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2009 10:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The desert game play they showed is fully detailed. They made a big point of talking about the contrast between the bright desert and the dark dungeon they had available, but that's a crock. The dungeon wasn't very dark at all and you could easily see enemies coming from very far away.
Reply

Posted: Aug 30th 2009 6:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm disappointed over the lack of a shapeshifting class. Right now the classes seem rather blah. Then again, Diablo 2 really got a kick in the pants when the LOD xpac came out and there's clearly going to be at least one xpac for D3 since Blizz likes to milk a franchise for all it's worth.

I'm looking forward to seeing if they have playable demos at PAX coming up next week though.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW