| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (28)

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:33PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$20.1? not bad, not bad at all.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:21PM jedimacfan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yea, if only someone had put an "M" rating logo on the package to "warn" people of the contents of this game. Oh, wait...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:30PM Kif said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They shouldn't have had to account for the 'hot coffee' content in their rating at all because the only way you could play it is if you modded the game.

It would be like installing an anti-blur mod in The Sims and going "OMG! pornography!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:40PM Radical Dylan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was looking at the picture, and kept seeing some gruesome beast... with a long tongue...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:47PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol, me too.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:52PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah but it's iced coffee? Not hot coffee? Zuh?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:58PM Tre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did the beast have six fingers?

Was it a chicken?

If it was, did it have large talons?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:12PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol i see it too
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:26PM Lukeyo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah at first I saw one of those Lickers from Resident Evil 2. Then a mangled Carnage. Then I read the headline and proceeded to facepalm.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:17PM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I saw a fly or a smoker at first but now it looks like a glass of RC cola.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 6:44PM wardob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That picture is actually making me kind of thirsty...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:18PM Starcade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me too. That's a great photo.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:30PM KinseySS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its the damn yellow ... it makes people hungry and thirsty
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:01PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should have just fully developed the sex minigame and put it in from the start. I guarantee that it would have doubled the already pretty insane sales figures.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:09PM Ignatius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Except for the policy against AO games by both stores and by the console makers. They would have never been able to sell it in a store, let alone have it work on the console. I forget if Sony has a no-AO policy or not, but it seems pretty universal.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:09PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh yeah, I forgot about the console makers. I'm sure given the hype around the game at the time a fair few stores would have carried the game anyway though.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:05PM lcchoops said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Broken link on hot cofee
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:16PM wardob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know, what a cock tease.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:16PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still dont understand why it got to AO, all the news people reporting on it completely ignored you had to illegitimately mod your console to get it, so there was no reason to make it Ao.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:18PM wardob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Has the news ever reported a gaming scandal with actual good reporting? They just want to find evidence that gaming is the devil.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:49PM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would be Dante's Inferno.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:12PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it was just that the content was on the disc. They did the same to Oblivion.

Here's a thought: if Guitar Hero came with a porno bonus video that you had to beat a literally impossible song to unlock, would it be classed as AO?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 7:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Cost the plaintiff a whole lot of beans"

... I think you mean the defendants.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 8:13PM kevin949 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, they mean the plaintiffs, because they're talking about the investors (the plaintiffs) when they lost money due to the stock dropping.

Re-read the article, you'll get it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 10:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, if there ever was anything that showcased the myriad facets of utter stupidity in today's culture it was this debacle.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2009 11:56PM germdove said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I never did see why Hot Coffee mattered at all, it was completely inaccessible to anyone who wasn't purposefully modding their game to look for it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 2:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its funny Take two may have one of the best known gaming franchise GTA, but it seems like they always end up paying big money to some one or losing money each year.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 12:03PM rbtroj said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How do I get my $0.79 of the settlement? I assume $20 million will go to the lawyers, and the $0.1 million will go to the class members.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW