| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (39)

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:39PM TheSaiyan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Come on Sony. Seriously. When you go up a whole number (i.e. 2 to 3), theres supposed to be a big step. As much as those sparkles brighten up my day, 3.0 leaves a lot to be desired. Of course I can possibly say i'm expecting too much, but then again, who isn't?

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:44PM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
would it make you feel better if they released a 3.0.1 patch to downgrade the number to 2.9.9?
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who made up this rule that X.0 is supposed to be a major change? (Which imo it was, and I can't wait 'til they start rolling out themes and avatars)
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 5:31PM ptcamn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
3.0 leaves a lot to be desired? Why?
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:19PM Kodros said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"When you go up a whole number (i.e. 2 to 3), theres supposed to be a big step"

Maybe you should go back and look at the 2.0 update where the biggest feature was Themes...

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/11/07/ps3-firmware-2-00-tomorrow-full-details-today/
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 8:15AM borland502 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sony prefers to fight the power and do major releases on point numbers. See, that's just how hip they are...

But if I were a betting man, I'd say that 3.0 contains framework code for subsequent large improvements. And if I want to talk further out of my ass, I'd say that it's smart to get all the bugs for said framework outta the way so that the cool features aren't marred by white controllers dying or game freezes.

Good thing I only do cold, hard speculation. I hate guesses from the uninformed.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:41PM Antilight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Anyone else notice the absence of the "PLAYSTATION 3" splash screen when starting a ps3 game?

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:44PM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know... You'd think that would remove some time from starting up a game... It seems to be quicker to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:45PM TheSaiyan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. There seems to be a logo on startup of the system but the logo at the startup of a game is missing. Who knows. Maybe they took it out to update it to a fancier, newer logo? The Swirly puddle thingy that used to come up on loading is now gone too.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:42PM Wiizer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I did my own informal tests with my 60 GB PS3, and got the following results:

I can play PS2 games.

But, that's not a big difference in before or after load times... I'll take my BC over -.001 addition to load times.

They took out the PlayStation3 screen, so I thought that would save some time.

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 5:09PM DrChristopher said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hahaha. Great comment!
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 1:11AM megapenguinx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did my own test with my 80gb and I got the following results:

I can't play like half my PS2 games.

But other than that, meh. Things on the menu seem to load a little bit faster for me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 8:17AM borland502 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I can't play like half my PS2 games."

Is the compatibility rate even close to that bad on the 80? If so, I think I will cry if my 60 ever dies. I have a ton of PS3 games to play, but I still haven't finished all I want to play from the last generation.
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Slim + Slim PS2 > FIVE NINETY NINE US DOLLARS
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 10:08PM PN04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The 80gb was supposed to have been brought to nearly identical compatibility as the 60gb but there are a few games with minor hitches that tend to ruin the game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:47PM googleadam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I did find that the XMB loads a little snappier in 3.0 when in-game

60GB owner


maybe it was just me tho

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:52PM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have a 60gb and with 3.0 I found that I'm 3 times less likely to visit the Playstation Store...out of spite.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It does for me too, along with the friends list and profiles.

40 GB owner
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 4:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Space: Why?
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 5:24PM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
because even though I check the store weekly they felt the need to add 3 more icons
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:27PM craigw08 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ space agreed do the think every ps3 owner is blind theyve given us massive icons and (if you include whats new) 4 ways to get into the store well done sony now the xmb is a clusterfuck
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 5:17PM fakeplasticball said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Screw the new hardware! I like my consoles like I like my cars, starting up with a werr-hiss- pop-ga-grrr-ga-grrr-grrrrr VROOM.

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:00PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
XMB is still unresponsively slow as molasses....

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the update also made it so that you can't view the XMB while listening to music...that was a functionality i used alot! come on sony get it right next time.

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:21PM craigw08 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you can. you have to change the output frequency in setting, but i cant remember what to
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 7:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
48k
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 6:38PM joe6801 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...on 2.8, the game takes forever to freeze" lol I HATE 3.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 7:03PM MrXile said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's all good as usual for me.... dont mind the changes.

Well, apart from the friends list now being awful to look at, yes, more information, but it looks ghastly.

Why is there no option to lower the font size or something? ITS HUGE!!

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 7:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
funny ludwig very funny, but seriously I laughed out loud, nice touch at the end.

Posted: Sep 2nd 2009 7:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To me it seems like everything loads up faster.

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 12:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well who gives a flying F**k bout thoes mili sec of loading time difference. jus gotta love the 3.0 for giving us a new look.jus loving it.

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 2:57AM bsd107 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The animated themes are cool. THAT'S IT!

I HATE the fact that this firmware basically loads the entire XMB with advertisements.

I HATE the scrolling advertisement up by the clock.

I also DON'T NEED a Playstation Store icon in three different places in the XMB.

I HATE that on startup it defaults to the "What's new" advertisement for the Playstation Store.

The XMB is now just as bad as the XB360 interface in terms of being loaded with advertisements - the lack of which was on of the things I liked about the PS3.

Also, why can't I have a black background anymore, as I did (at night) with the previous firmware? Purple is the darkest color I can pick!?!?!?!?!?

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 9:36AM Celicynd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea, I was kind of wondering about that last night too.. what the heck is with the purple. bleh. I liked the black background... and I can't even pick it as a color option.
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 4:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
brad just fyi you can disable whats new go to settings and you can change it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 11:09AM Xemplar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So the difference in load times are... split-seconds?

Oh for crying out loud.

Posted: Sep 3rd 2009 3:05PM joel o said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I WANT MY PLAYSTATION SPLASH LOGO BACK!!!

just because they got the new slim PS"cheap" they shouldnt have taken out the logo, I still dont understand why Sony would go backwards on a logo (a la PS2) in the first place?! Its not like going back to a PS2 like logo will make people buy it, they should fire who designed the new console look anyway

Posted: Sep 5th 2009 6:39PM joel o said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I WANT MY ORIGINAL PLAYSTATION 3 SPLASH LOGO!!!

just because they got the new slim PS"cheap" they shouldnt have taken out the logo, I still dont understand why Sony would go backwards on a logo (a la PS2) in the first place?! Its not like going back to a PS2 like logo will make people buy it, they should fire who designed the new console look anyway

Not until Sony gives us back what we want changed (whatever everyone else is gripping about), or on my part the logo, Im not updating, and I guess I wont be playing my PS3 online, people should boycott and not play online, that should hurt their online revenue to make a voice!

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uncharted initial load (2.8): 39.4 seconds
Uncharted initial load (3.0): 40.3 seconds

So the loading time went down ~2%, but now the game crashes every 5 minutes.


Thank you, Sony. :sarcasm:

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:29PM Silverslykid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i own a 60gb and my xmb and games load noticably faster so about there being no difference with the 60gb model. thats a lie!
i love 3.00 and i have no issues with it :D

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW