| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (51)

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:10AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nooooooooooooooo! Shackle thine legal-hounds, and bring forth Mechassault without the sucketh of Lone Wolf!

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 7:32PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea, MechAssault already sucks enough without it!
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:12AM Berzerk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So, their argument is that Battletech from 1984 is copying Robotech from 1985, when it's evident that both series have fairly similar robots to begin with...

This will end well.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:37AM radda said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Both universes have/used to have designs based off of an old anime from 1982, called SDF Macross. Harmony Gold is in the green here, despite years of being complete douchebags, if these designs really are based off of Macross, since they happen to own all merchandising rights to the Macross franchise, which includes videogames and mech designs.

This is a real licensing quagmire, and Harmony Gold are well known in the anime community for their douchebaggery in the matter and their complete disregard for the original Japanese rights holders (who probably don't give two shits about this particular dispute anyway).
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:41AM wcanyon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Really, when you get right down to it, FASA ripped off a couple of mech designs from Robotech. No doubt about it. The Archer comes to mind. Don't recall what the Veritech was called in Battletech, but I think it was a 20-30 ton mech.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:35PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The first arc of Robotech is SDF Macross dubbed in English. After years of legal wrangling, Harmony Gold owns (at a minimum) the rights to that series in the United States (not sure about Japan). So no, Robotech didn't rip off anything.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:13AM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In response to this claim, Dissonance Iron says "Robotech can suck my balls."

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:15AM lemurpants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Harmony Gold believes they have the rights to all things Macross in the US. And since Battletech shamelessly leaches some Macross mecha designs, Harmony Gold sends in the lawyers. So perhaps if HG loses this legal fight, perhaps that'll pave the way for more proper Macross stuff licensed in the US.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:17AM seishino said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone have a link to the proper trailer? All I can find is a teaser trailer that involves one robot foot.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:18AM AaronCamp said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is not a new dispute. The Marauder, Warhammer, Phoenix Hawk, Rifleman and a few other IS mechs have been in contention for years. That is why they were removed after Mechwarrior 2. I think they were pulled from Ghot bear legacy as well, but were NOT there in Mercenaries for that very reason. If you go back and look at Robotech series one, you will see that there is NO difference between the Phoenix Hawk and the batteloid mode of a Veritec. Kyron (one of the Zentradi) pilots a mech that looks VERY close to a Marauder. In various scenes you will see mechs on the SDF1 that look like the rifelman, Warhammer, Rhino and others. If I remember correctly, FASA had to pull the designs from its pen and paper games as well and I know that some book covers from he Mechwarrior and Battletech novels had to be changed when reprinted and the mech diagrams in the back had to be removed. Decision at Thundar Rift is a great example. I have a copy with a Marauder on the cover and a spec sheet on it in the back, but later printings have a different cover and no spec sheet, though the mech is still referred to and described the same in the book. Guess the image is copyrighted, and not its description.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 2:39PM Jenks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, I always wondered why I didn't see Marauder after Mechwarrior 2. It was my favorite!
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:19AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SUPPRESS THE OPPOSITION

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:21AM ceetheman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If lawyers were doctors, we would have cured every known diseases by now.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:25PM Bolts said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
amen to that

How many man-hours have been pissed away debating whose fucking stupid pictures of robots belong to whom?
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't imagine something as piddly as this will stop the game.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The mechs in the video look like the mechs from all of the other games. This isn't some project phoenix type of units, this seems like Robotech trying to stay relevant or possibly HG is just trying to cash in on something good.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:12PM ultrabot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's what they do best though!
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:28AM seishino said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you!

That actually looks pretty fun.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah keep in mind that video is a target render and not real in game footage. Still...
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The trailer featured a Warhammer, which is an Excalibur in the Robotech Universe. I hope they work out the rights, because I grew up on these mechs in the tabletop version and was pretty excited to see them in a game.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:43AM jynxycat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They removed the mechs in question from lots of Battletech games/print before, they can just do it again.

They mechs that are infringing on copyright issues aren't popular anyhow.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:39PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Makes you wonder why they would even bother adding these mechs in, especially considering how they would want to avoid even the hint of impropriety.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 6:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also given that people who can come up with non-copyright infringing mech designs aren't exactly hard to find. Hell, some artists seem to specialize in just that.

I'll admit I'm not huge on Macross, but are the mech designs *that* iconic that they couldn't have just come up with something original?
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 10:52AM Gaming Expert said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like another cash grab by non-gamers again.. ...sigh.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:23AM makimak22 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The MACROSS series is having a revival in Japan and one reason the US is not hearing anything about this, is HG wanting to put their greedy fingers in the pie...

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:32AM Drake Lake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But makimak22, isn't it so obvious that the revival isn't happening here all because of Battletech (according to tuffy)?
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:21PM ultrabot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
not entriely, if HG was trying to make macross still relevant in the US after ADV's death over the past week they would have to actually try now, ie by painfully latching onto another distributor and re-release robotech AGAIN or try to sucker the huge amounts of cash from a company like FUNimation to license Macross ZERO or Frontier.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:38PM toastix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Macross and Robotech are 2 different franchises. They are owned by different companies but due to screwed up international copyright both are allowed to exists with the same robots.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aren't we lucky Tolkien and his heirs did not squash all of the derivative works we've had since then.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Harmony Gold is in the right here. Catalyst studios talked about the issue with some of the original 'mechs at http://battletech.catalystgamelabs.com/2009/08/10/sometimes-things-just-dont-go-as-we-want-them-to/

I think it is pretty jerky for them to demand the trailers be pulled, but I guess they don't want to create the impression you can use their materials in the new game.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:31AM Mr Itcher said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EarthSiege 2 was awesome.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:59AM mocax said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Starsiege was teh mostest awesomest too.... :(

Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:34PM Hedgeson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Starsiege Tribes was great too... sorry didn't play the precursors.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 11:56AM AtomicPlayboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This reminds me that we could use a really great Robotech game.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:23PM Abriael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We could use a really great MACROSS game, like Macross Ultimate Frontier on the PSP. The problem is that we won't have any in the west exactly because of Harmony Gold.

Can't care the less about that half-cooked abortion that was robotech.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 12:48PM AtomicPlayboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gotta slightly disagree there. I have no use for the Masters or Invid Invasion portions of the original trilogy, so I'm with you on the Macross emphasis. However, as one who thoroughly enjoyed the Robotech novel series, including the mainly-Macross-characters Sentinels series. Conversely, I've got no love for the more recent Macross anime. So I've got more interest in the Robotech incarnation than the original, and I'd like to see more done with it. Hopefully Toby MacGuire's upcoming live action movie won't be horrible, and hopefully some inspired developer will bring us the next Tie Fighter or Wing Commander in the Robotech universe.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:15PM Abriael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
gotta agree to disagree then.
Robotech had nothing to do even with the original macross series, so many details and translations were changed to make it more "kid friendly" that it isn't even funny. Everything Robotech will always be an half-baked westernized aberration that no self-respecting animation fan will ever appreciate.

"Protoculture" powered fighters? Please...
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 5:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The 'Mechs Harmony Gold gets its panties in a bunch about are referred to in Battletech circles as "The Unseen". FASA licensed a number of designs from various anime in the early 80s which didn't yet have distribution rights in the US (Macross, Dougram, and others). In 1985 Harmony Gold came along and "created" Robotech by combining a couple of different mecha series including Macross and redubbing them. Harmony Gold considered themselves the sole distributors of the Macross designs they licensed from Studio Nue. In the early 90s Playmates licensed some Robotech designs to release alongside their Exo Squad toys. Harmony Gold and Playmates went after FASA for the Studio Nue designs (the Macross designs) they licensed. FASA lost and could no longer publish images of the 12 Unseen 'Mechs. All post-1996 FASA products could refer to the Unseen but not display their imagery. This included miniatures but also video game licenses like the MechWarrior series.

Harmony Gold has come back out of obscurity to shit on another Battletech franchise owner. Catalyst Game Labs (who owns Battletech now) thought they would be able to publish images of the Unseen again. Harmony Gold shit all over that idea and is now going after other Battletech licensees. Hopefully Piranha does what Catalyst did with it's "Project Phoenix" and release the Unseen designs with new artwork which is similar but doesn't fall under the Harmony Gold lawsuit.

Harmony Gold can seriously fuck off.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:33PM toastix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know the guys that make the miniature tabletop game Wizkids/Catalyst settled a rights dispute with them that allowed the to publish certain mechs that resembled robotech mechs. I know another thing to is that Harmony Gold never offically had the rights to robotech in the US and their was legal dispute over that a few years back where Harmony Gold lost that case.

The year and setting of this game before the arrival of the clans only put a few mechs in dispute but these were the same mechs that wizkids just one a legal battle over. The mechs were called the Unseen because they were not allowed to be manufactured in the miniature line http://www.classicbattletech.com/index.php?action=news saddly the news link is down to that particular article.

If they got the mechs back in the table top game I see them coming back in the video games.

Catalyst did when the legal battle for the unseen

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 1:41PM toastix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
forgive my spelling i wrote in a hurry.

If you can get the link to work the catalyst news post was on June 24, talked all about the Unseen and the Phoenix project mechs.

http://www.classicbattletech.com/index.php?action=news
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 2:58PM toastix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh that is an interesting link. I guess I was completely off base, thank you for sharing that with me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 3:17PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would help if all copy right becomes public domain after 10 years.... so people would focus on making new and not sweat over older stuff...and protecting older stuff....and stagnating everything to protect old stuff....

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 7:35PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As an artist I just want to say that is a terrible idea.
Reply

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 3:30PM Pipp said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I can't believe after all these years they are still throwing a fit over some robot designs. If they were making money off them, and actively using them in their own games, or making toys with them I wouldn't have a problem with it, but the fact is, they have been doing nothing with them. Why don't they just license them out to whoever is publishing this Battletech game for a REASONABLE amount that both parties can agree to? Even if its a piddly amount, something is better than nothing.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 7:53PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WiredKnight
Then because of your own personal greed you allow theCP owners society to rape both consumers and artists alike.

CP should be limited to 10 years and then trade mark 5-10 based off what was last sold,basically CP your work in a broader sense TM the characters and unique items,places,ect, if you can not sell anything in 5-10 years it becomes public domain.But any new material you make off it as the original creator can be CP/TM'd for another limited duration.

Basically if you do not invest the effort to make new whatever was sold becomes something anyone with a entrepreneurs sense can resale it but only a few would scrape a living off it.


The current system allows organizations and single person entities to own to much that conglomeration of power dose more damage than good to both consumers and artists, even you have to admit that.

Allowing the system more than decade to fully abuse a CP is not a good thing IMO.

Posted: Sep 4th 2009 7:55PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pip
Because harmony gold is a CP troll. Thats how they stay in money.... and managed to keep any new macross from becoming domesticated.....

Posted: Sep 5th 2009 2:24AM RobotechMaster said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: Sep 19th 2009 1:05AM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Harmony Gold blows, in general.
| 1 | 2 |

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW