| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (40)

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is cool. He looks almost Fable-esque.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We were talking to one of the guys at the Torchlight booth and I was really interested until he mentioned that there is NO multi-player in this game. That's a pretty big nail in the coffin for me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's a shame but I don't think that should be a requirement. (Then again, I hate playing multiplayer games unless the other players are in the same room as me.)
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 6:50AM Ghen said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Not even LAN play? Crap.

Well Titan Quest did ok single player for me... (the servers couldn't handle the load so I pretended they didn't exist)
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$19.99 for a game with the full creation tools is pretty amazing, and it's a precursor to the MMO that is coming later. The single player was a lot of fun.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:23PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
color me interested...just $19?? I'll most likely be getting this
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:24PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For a second I thought Pixar was doing the animations. Crysis would've been beaten.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:25PM Dalrint said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does this remind anyone else of Fate?
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:37PM freaparn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Painfully so, heh. Even the whole "feed your pets, watch 'em mutate" thing was in Fate. Since that was Travis Baldree's project, and he's working on this (pretty much identical) project, it's not terribly surprising to see some features revisited. Not necessarily a bad thing anyway... Fate had some neat ideas, it just lost focus and wandered all over as soon as you entered the dungeon.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:47PM sonofman said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I do not see how this is compared to pixar... Any cartoon company perhaps but Pixar is lightyears beyond this primitive looking clone. While it maaaay be fun to play and while it maaaay be somewhat worth the price of admission, anybody or company that had anything to do with Flagship is never getting another dollar from me. They should give this game free to Hellgate: London Lifetime Subscribers who they left for dead only a few months after accepting their cash....

Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I wish more video games looked like this one. I think I'll buy it too.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 8:51PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if I should find the monsters adorable or menacing.


I want this.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:18PM WiiFTW said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This is great to keep me going until D3 drops. The art direction also separates it from other Diablo-type games.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:22PM Discotheque said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll definitely pick this up if it's good. $19 price tag is great, and the game itself looks quite good too. I'm quite excited for DeathSpank aswell.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:22PM Avolii said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Best thing is has going, no competition from Diablo 3 until 2052.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"so close to shipping you could taste it (just ask our own Griffin McElroy who was in the beta)"
Orrrrrr we could ask someone who was actually in the beta/honest and they'll tell you it was 6 months MINIMUM away from release. And that only if they heavily scaled back their goals.

Torchlight's looking very good though and for $20 up front (instead of micro transaction based) it seems a solid investment. :)
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 10:37PM Rollins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was close to being release-ready until they decided to introduce the overworld and revamp everything.

Regardless, I miss that game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looks surprisingly decent. If my computer can run this (it probably can't, it's bad) I'd consider trying it out since it's cheap.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:34PM Yan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm going to play the Act IV out of it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good one.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well ok, but only because you said so...since you have such an impeccable reputation
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:43PM Haikiba said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Must EVERYTHING with a cartoony artstyle be compared to Pixar now?
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:46PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I -love- free things!!!


[presses report button]
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. Everyone may want to check it out!!! LOL......
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 9:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I will go there...Really wonderful.!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 10:37PM inteller said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
wow....Dungeon Siege called, they want their IP back.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 10:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Couple things the article doesn't mention: There is no multiplayer, but that is because the MMO in the same world is set to be released 18 months later (with testing phases long before that), and the game ships with the developer's tools to allow for easy modding, so people will be able to do anything to the game they want. Apparently a couple clicks can make every monster a bloody exploding bath of particle effects.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 11:08PM Demaar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No multiplayer kills my interest entirely. I only play these types of games with other people. Even network multiplayer would be fine. Why leave it out? Seems lame to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 11:31PM Mavrick593 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to go to there....
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 11:33PM Mavrick593 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks like it will keep all of us busy until Diablo III (finally) arrives. and $20 ain't bad at all. I'll def keep an eye out for this one
Reply

Posted: Sep 7th 2009 11:50PM ructus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No multi player actually is better for me, I can play it however long i want, and whenever, never have to wait for someone else, especially people that like to make you wait AFTER joining your group. And, you can play this without internet connection? Pretty sweet.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 1:57AM FOI said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$19.99? At least give me a chance to not buy it.

FATE was a good game that a lot of people passed on because of WildTangent's reputation for making malware.

It sounds like a lot of the systems from FATE are actually in Torchlight as well. Man are people in for a treat when they see exactly how the pets are used.

*sigh* Great now I gotta find FATE and reinstall it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 2:19AM cowthulhu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The steampunk mage is the main reason I'd check it out. And the low, low price.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 2:52AM Triscuit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they take another page from the Blizzard book and release it for mac+pc on one disc, or at least at the same time.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 3:46AM drun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can see there's some wallpapers in the gallery yet you guys compressed them... whatever, I can use them anyway.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 5:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the game has no shaders so that helps a lot, they've had it running on a netbook at 12fps, which is bad, but your pc is better than a netbook, right :)
they did say that at least a geforce 2 is required, so, that's pretty much everybody

tmacairjordan87 wrote "Looks surprisingly decent. If my computer can run this (it probably can't, it's bad)"
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 5:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The company is only 12 months old and this game is coming out Oct 27. They're a small and new company and probably didn't have the resources to develop, code and test multiplayer from the start.


Adding that capability would add months to the development time and who knows how much more money.
They probably thought it best to get something out the door now and start bringing money in and then begin work on the mmo instead of developing this with multiplayer for another 6 months with no money coming in.


Besides, this lays the foundation for the mmo. Same theme, look and style. So now that they've got some weapons, armor and tilesets done and they're going to have money coming in, we may all be in the alpha version of the mmo in 6 months.


Demaar wrote "No multiplayer kills my interest entirely. ... Why leave it out? Seems lame to me."
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2009 3:54PM GeeM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
looks amazing, sign me up!
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2009 12:21AM oteriba said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When I read 20 bones I was like what? These guys are seriously undercutting themselves. If the game is good, I'll buy for sure.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2009 4:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've played through the demo like crazy, and just purchased the full version. What I've experienced so far is incredibly fun. No multiplayer? That seemed like a big deal to me a first, but now I don't care. This is the best $20 I've spent on gaming in a long time. Good job, Runic! I can't stop playing my Vanquisher :)
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW