EA marketers send Joystiq a $200 check and we save their souls
140
EA's been slowly ticking off the levels of Hell by way of marketing stunts for the upcoming God-of-War-em-up Dante's Inferno. The first circle of Hell is "Limbo" ... and though we're not sure, the E3 "staged protest" was an early Dante's Inferno marketing stunt, so maybe limbo? Next is circle two: "Lust." Cue the controversial Comic-Con "Sin to Win" stunt wherein one "lucky" winner received "a night with the hottest girl at Comic-Con." Yeah, that didn't go over so well. Next up is "Gluttony." To celebrate the third circle of Hell, they mailed our own Randy Nelson a severed limb cake. We didn't reward them with a post for that one.
However, the latest stunt is a little more creative. They've mailed this editor, and presumably the editors at several other media outlets, a check for $200. The packaging says that "by cashing this check you succumb to avarice by hoarding filthy lucre but by not cashing it, you waste it, and thereby surrender to prodigality." If your SAT dictionary isn't at arm's length, that last one means wastefulness. So, we either cash it and "succumb to avarice" or burn it and be wasteful. What's an ethical gaming blog to do ...
... how about this? How about we cash it, and donate all $200 to The White House Project, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization "that aims to advance women's leadership in all communities and sectors – up to the U.S. presidency – by filling the leadership pipeline with a richly diverse, critical mass of women"? Of course, we'll make the donation in EA's name. It won't make up for Sin to Win, but the road to redemption's got to start somewhere, right?
Reader Comments (140)
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:00PM (Unverified) said
I don't see the problem with cashing it for yourself. It's not a bribe, they're not expecting anyone to give dante's inferno a good score 5 months from now if they cash it.
Personally, I wish they'd give me $200. I'd buy their game, but I'd spend the other $140 on games that I actually care about.
Reply
Personally, I wish they'd give me $200. I'd buy their game, but I'd spend the other $140 on games that I actually care about.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:10PM (Unverified) said
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e131/motorhead069/AndHereWeGo.gif
Seriously, why do you insist on me making your life here miserable?
You know what, no. I'm taking the high road here. I'll let everyone else tear you apart.
Reply
Seriously, why do you insist on me making your life here miserable?
You know what, no. I'm taking the high road here. I'll let everyone else tear you apart.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:04PM Haggard said
The problem is, as discussed on the podcast, that if Chris takes something of value (outside of a copy of the game that he needs to review it) then there's no way that he can prove his neutrality towards the game or EA in general. I'd still trust him, but there's a large segment of the internet that might not, particularly after the incident with Jeff Gerstmann over at Gamespot.
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:22PM (Unverified) said
The point wasn't about whether it was right or wrong to cash the check for yourself, merely that Chris beat there system where they attempted to make him succumb to greed either way.
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:51PM Saria the Cat said
Exactly what the Baron said. The fact that it is purely cash written out to Chris makes it even more unethical to accept personally. It's called journalistic integrity. The Joystiq people are a fun bunch but they still keep their shit together.
Cashing it and donating the money to a charity is a great idea.
Reply
Cashing it and donating the money to a charity is a great idea.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:58PM einhanderkiller said
How about cash the check and buy three copies of the game to give away?
(Awesome idea right here)
Reply
(Awesome idea right here)
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 8:03PM AdamSpruijt said
@Baron: What happened to Jeff is basically the opposite of taking a bribe you do realize, the dude was fired cause Kane & Lynch sucked dick and Eidos had spent too much money to allow the truth to be posted on Gamespot. Besides Jeff's new site it the Bomb!... like a giant one at that!
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 8:12PM Haggard said
Yeah, but the company took the ad money and in return their neutrality towards Kane & Lynch was so skewed that they fired one of their reviewers for being hostile towards it.
It's the same basic principle, just with the events changed. Like Ayn Rand's bibliography.
Reply
It's the same basic principle, just with the events changed. Like Ayn Rand's bibliography.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 8:52PM TheDarkWayne said
@The Baron's second post http://instantrimshot.com/
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:03PM deathxrebirth said
You could endorse it over to Child's Play. I am sure it wouldn't go to waste there.
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:05PM RobS the 3rd said
No, but there is one that helps them deal with the resulting Zombie Apocalypse
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 9:56PM Jack Tretton said
You know where that check would, and has gone to waste? In the hands of Kotaku's Schmuck-in-Chief, who burned his.
Reply
Posted: Sep 10th 2009 10:34AM EDay said
Yeah, Brian Crecente burned it, and made a video of it that is on YouTube, and Kotaku. He probably didn't put much thought into it, as there are quite a few commenters there telling him that what he did was pretty stupid. Which it was. My first inclination would be to donate the money to the local children's hospital or SPCA.
Reply
Posted: Sep 13th 2009 4:26PM OmegaNemesis28 said
I agree 110% with what Kotaku's guy did. They earned massive respect from me now. I'd think the same with you guys. He did what he wanted to, and I believe it was the right thing.
If anything, I think Joystiq should donate to Child's Play. They have a very good cause. I was in a hospital bed for one month straight before and I had absolutely nothing to do. Child's Play is out to change that for kids and young adults. If not, Joystiq should burn it anyway.
Reply
If anything, I think Joystiq should donate to Child's Play. They have a very good cause. I was in a hospital bed for one month straight before and I had absolutely nothing to do. Child's Play is out to change that for kids and young adults. If not, Joystiq should burn it anyway.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:03PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
I'm just glad that gat damn ad is gone...
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 7:36PM Istari Spartan said
something something porn
something something beer.
Reply
something something beer.
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:06PM (Unverified) said
I could only imagine someone like Ghost Rider throwing this at me. I dont think mr. UPS is going to be sending me a check from the bowels of hell.
Maybe we could have a PSN card giveaway or something ?
Reply
Maybe we could have a PSN card giveaway or something ?
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:07PM (Unverified) said
Oops...forgot to add
- And XBOX Live cards ? And wii cards....or whatever their card. I think wii has a store? But yep. point made.
Reply
- And XBOX Live cards ? And wii cards....or whatever their card. I think wii has a store? But yep. point made.
Posted: Sep 10th 2009 12:51PM foxdude333 said
I donated $50 to UNICEF once. Then they started spamming me with "DONATE MORE TO US" and other non-profits spamming me for "DONATE TO MEEEE!"
The lesson? Don't donate to UNICEF (... or if you do, don't give out any info but "anonymous" on it)
Reply
The lesson? Don't donate to UNICEF (... or if you do, don't give out any info but "anonymous" on it)
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:06PM TherionMEC said
How is it prodigality? You're not spending any money if you're not cashing the check. They still keep the money, and it's not being spent on anything period, let alone something frivolous, at least not by you.
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:07PM (Unverified) said
CASH IT CASH IT CASH IT!!
Then record the reactions on their face when you cash it. Alone with your Pin number ;)
Reply
Then record the reactions on their face when you cash it. Alone with your Pin number ;)
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:08PM (Unverified) said
OR you could give it to your loyal posters.
(or use it for swag Saturday)
Reply
(or use it for swag Saturday)
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:10PM (Unverified) said
I would vote for the check to go to Unicef or Child's Play, they are well known charities without a political slant, any other charity that is even remotely political is wasteful to me ¬_¬
Reply
Posted: Sep 9th 2009 6:14PM (Unverified) said
Child's Play is the one that should get the money.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 213 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 150 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 106 comments
- EA's Origin has signed up 9.3 million players since launch 103 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 94 comments













