| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (111)

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Prey not pray.

kthxbye
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fuck, you got me on that one.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:21AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Justin you guys can curse on here?? I was under the impression that you couldn't....why not do it more often...lol
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I can curse in the comments all I want, it's the wild, wild, west down here. But we try to keep posts between G and PG-13.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:29AM aristokrat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What has been seen cannot be unseen!*

*despite any editorial tricks you pull, unless, of course, even Joystiq staff can't find a post edit function
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:41AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Niiiiiice....y'all should do it more often when people piss you off...lol
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:42AM Bagels said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Animaniacs weren't always G, why do you have to be.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:47AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dropping some F-bombs would definitely make the banhammer more lethal!
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:49AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Instead of the "I've been banned" comment it could be something like,

"Fuck you! You're fucking banned, bitch!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:04AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Jesse that would be hilarious
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 11:36AM sonicspike41 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
People might think the poster is talking to someone else since it's "you" and not "me" or "I".

"Fuck me! I'm fucking banned, bitch!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 11:38AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
"Fuck me! I've been banned like the bitch I am!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 17th 2009 10:27PM Ryuk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
aw poo. you guys are silly
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Ugh. If you want to be an editor, write your own blog. Say something about what a well-written review it was, not the fact that he fucked up once and used the wrong homonym.

People who've never waited tables often leave shitty tips and people who've never produced their own content really get off on correcting typos.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:09AM LuTon James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've only tried the demo but the controls are so outdated (ps2 esque).
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 12:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They really are. I thought the whole character and style concept was good too. The character needs waaaay better animation and at decent sword combo system ala DMC or NG. It doesn't have to be as hardcore but some more than one button over and over with shitty animations.

Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, this game is awful. It has such great style, too, it's all wasted on the terrible controls, aiming... Pretty much everything else.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:11AM Jerkamie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh thanks ryan.

I'm holding off on this game maybe for a rental. Bullet time got a little old from max payne.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:15AM XeroAF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The bullet time wore thin in the demo, honestly. I always thought that Max Payne would have been awesome with infinite bullet-time, but now I know that it is better in small doses, so as to not get repetitive.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 2:04PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the bullet time animation is saw awful too.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:13AM XeroAF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"film grain that's on the screen at all times (you can turn it off, but you won't)"

Oh.... it's on....
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:14AM JeezWhiz87 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I played the demo for Wet, and found it really unsatisfying to play. I just did not enjoy the gameplay. I DID however, love the execution of the game. I watched a friend of mine play through the demo, and found it extremely entertaining to watch. I love the gritty grindhouse feel of it, I just don't really want to play it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:20AM The angry pro consumer gaming ga said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Played the demo and hated it, so much so that I took it off my Gamefly Q right after I turned off my xbox.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 11:00AM decapitor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Totally agree. everything about the game except the controls seemed really cool, and I think that if you spent a few hours mastering the controls that they would be fine, but they are anything but intuitive at first.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 12:32PM Co said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I watched a friend of mine play through the demo, and found it extremely entertaining to watch. I love the gritty grindhouse feel of it, I just don't really want to play it."

I've heard more people echo sentiments along these lines this generation in regards to 360/PS3 titles than ever before in my video game playing life.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 2:34PM Larz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Cody
It's true. I think people are just jaded, spoiled, call it whatever you like... they're just not satisfied with anything anymore.

When I played the demo I thought "Wow, Tomb Raider meets Grindhouse with a little Max Payne thrown in!" I thought it was an interesting way to spice up Tomb Raider gameplay, which everyone seemed to love back in the day. And don't tell me Tomb Raider is about solving puzzles. There really weren't that many puzzles... go back and play the first couple games, I'm right.
Reply

Posted: Sep 22nd 2009 6:39PM Uphillbothways said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I absolutely loved the demo. Played it through 3 or 4 times, which I rarely do. I didn't find the controls cumbersome though I wish I didn't have to hold down the button for the wall run, but that was something I got used to.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh Shut the F up man. Was that comment really necessary. I agree with Justin's review. It's very cool to see games trying to completely change up the formula. And a game like this, I think needs support, especially when you've got folks like the Activision CEO talking about how his only real motive is raping every single last penny out of every consumer in the world. The more unique interesting games out there, I will support 100%. Joystiq has been very good about treating games with the right perspective and context they deserve. They never hesitate to rip a game -and hard- when it has it's problems, but they never forget the primary rule, am I having fun? I'll never forget how pissed I was when I saw other gaming sites complaining about Mirror's Edge or Prince of Persia (the latter, when concerning the whole "you can't die" issue) and Joystiq was the only website I encountered that seemed to approach it from the correct point of view. So suffice to say, Justin ignore the idiot rich above me, this has been yet another fair, well written review by joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:44AM MDizzy said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Honestly the whole not dying thing would have been better as an option than the default way of doing it. It removes the challenge from the game. Even the combat, oh you mess up get knocked on your ass and fail to press the quicktime button in the hour they give you to do so? No worries, Elika will save you. Even if you manage to fail while Elika is "injured" she still somehow saves you. It's a BEAUTIFUL game...but not necessarily challenging.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:03AM bimmy said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
this game really "tries to completely change the formula" for you? if so, maybe you need to play more games...if i'm an idiot for bashing this game, well i'll be an idiot saving $60...enjoy playing your "WET" blanket
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:51AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Honestly the whole not dying thing would have been better as an option than the default way of doing it. It removes the challenge from the game."

No it doesn't. It replaces checkpoints.

Would the game be any harder if, when you fell down a pit, it showed you dying, then you respawned at the checkpoint without a scratch? No, it's the same damn thing. The main difference is that in PoP, it looks cool and makes more sense for Elika to save you.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 12:04PM misterterner said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I must say that I too tried the Demo and was disappointed. The game does not bring anything new to the table. In fact it looks and feels like an ok PS2 game. The camera is awful and made me dizzy and disoriented. Your move set feels limited and uninspired. In fact except for the style which "nicely" hides the dated visuals this game has nothing going for it.

I was excited about it from the trailer, but the Demo turned me completely off. If I see it in the bargain bin for 12 bucks then maybe but definitely not a solid or polished experience.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 3:52PM ptcamn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just one lesson on how the market works Alex: companies such as Activision, and even the company behind Wet, produce games for profit. They don't do it because they want to entertain you but rather make tons of many out of your hobby.They put out a product that you want looking to make money. The beauty is that if you don't want or like their product you are free not to buy it. And when a lot of people think like that the company will try to improve a product so next time they can sell it with success. If you are one of those "every CEO is an evil man for wanting to make money" kind of guy then having a hobby such as video games is not really the way to "stick it to the man".
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 6:57PM Seff said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pat,
That's a pretty cynical view of the games industry.
You don't think any company out there is doing this because that's what they enjoy doing? Or that they care about a quality product over profit (since quality games drive profit higher in the long term anyway).
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:06PM Wet Bandit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought the game was fun. Kiss the baby.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the PS3 demo a few nights back. Loved the atmosphere, loved the music, loved the stylised SLASH-THE-FUCK-OUT-OF-EVERYTHING sequence, hated the quick-timer-ridden motorway bit. I'll probably buy this in six months when it's cheap enough to justify.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Dad?
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 5:19PM Jesse James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the demo on the PSN and something about this game just seemed off. I mean in theory everything there seemed to be fun but it wasn't. It seems like shooting someone doesn't cause as much damage while not in the slow mo modes so the car sequence where you don't have the ability to do the slow mow at will was frustrating. The weird black and white and red mode in the demo where she just kills tons of people was amazing looking though.

I'd consider getting this game once it's cheaper because right now with Uncharted 2 and Brutal Legend on the horizon my gaming time is already spoken for.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:23AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Horrible review....demo sucked. Pretty much all there is to say....
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:55AM Bubbameister33 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How can a review be horrible if it's based on the opinion of the author's time with the game?
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 10:22AM The angry pro consumer gaming ga said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The review is not bad, but the game is. The style and feel is cool, but everything else just plain sucked at least from what I played on the demo.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to know how you, the Joystiq users, keep tabs on this "sprinkles" character and his other aliases. Who is "sprinkles"? Have you Jostiq users developed a sixth sense for this "sprinkles"? If he made an indistinguishable account tomorrow, could you call him out just like that?
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:25AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I liked the Demo of the game...and Gamefly sent it out yesterday so Hopefully I will be playing it tomorrow....but I don't think I will be "Keeping it"
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Going to go pick this game up later today. I haven't played the demo yet, but after buying and playing fighters since SF4, I need something new for my PS3.. And Rubi looks too good to pass up.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:25AM ugotamesij said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not call it what it is?
Generic Quentin Tarantino Movie: The Game

(Having said that, I enjoyed the demo and may well pick this up in store)
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 9:42AM Haggard said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Tarantino movies usually have a lot of very clever dialogue, though.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 11:36AM Blaquebeird said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like Jules' speech about the bible verse in Pulp Fiction.
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 11:53AM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Awesome, after playing the demo i was really enthralled by the Grindhouse kind of feel, especially since i had just seen Inglorious Basterds and upset at how that lacked the grindhouse feel, at least after the very grindhousey introduction of Hugo. Glad to hear the core gameplay is good, i think i might pay full price for this to support the chance of a finer developed sequel
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 12:13PM Riley said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And I'm 99.7% sure the same guy who did the voice overs for the Grindhouse trailers did the Wet commercial
Reply

Posted: Sep 15th 2009 3:31PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah it was definitely him, dude's in everything, i'm almost positive it's Tom Kane, the guy who does Jim Gordon, Quincy Sharp and Amadeus Arkham, in Arkham Asylum, as well as a hundred other roles in cartoons and commercials, but even if it isnt Tom Kane, it's still the same guy as Grindhouse
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW