| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (142)

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:04PM PR0F3TA said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
i like how Sony is taking this as an add-on for a console and not treating it like a new console release itself.

With that Eye Pet coming out soon, it shows they know what they are doing. Wish MS would show a cool game that isn't like we have seen on the Eye Toy
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:31PM Rick James said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree that this is pretty cool.

Speaking of cool games, I can think of a one in particular:
-Interactive Sex Dungeon
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:37PM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hope they see that this whole drawing and painting stuff would be absolutely perfect for little big planet and don't let this opportunity pass them by.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 7:04PM Cheesus Crust said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I just hope these cool tech demos are included with the controller! Anyone remember the PS EYE Tank scanning game? That would have been a perfect $2-$5 PSN title!
If these come with the controller, that should REALLY help people realize how great it is, Because as we all know, look how Wii Sports and Wii Resort turned out, they generated TONS of hype for the thing.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 7:09PM HighFiveJesus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe the for sequel.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 8:57PM EDay said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
That's probably because Sony's motion controller is pretty much identical to Wii Motion Plus as far as 1:1 and the tracking, but with the ability to have video of the user and overlay graphics into the image. They can't really say "Oh look! This is like brand new! You've never seen anything like this before!", because we have. How the two newcomers fair is to be seen, but they both look quite interesting.

What is also interesting is the lack of comments against motion controls. There have never been a lack of them before. I guess some people only like motion control if certain companies are doing it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:11PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Jimbo

I didn't know motion plus could track where you are in 3-d space and had sub millimeter accuracy. Color me impressed.

The reason I think a lot of people may react differently to this opposed to the Wii Mote is because this isn't being pushed on the consumer as their primary controller. This is an optional controller that people can choose to buy or not. Also, I don't see Sony flooding the market with casual crap. If you see that type of garbage on the PS3 then you can expect to see the same type of reaction as the Wii has taken.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 10:11PM I AM IRONHIDE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Please, PLEASE SONY MAKE AN EXCLUSIVE STAR WARS GAME WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 11:14PM Extinction said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would love to make the V for Vendetta logo in dominoes with that

And no, this is not like Wii motion plus, since WMP isnt 1:1 by Nintendo's admission. This is. And WMP doesn't have augmented reality.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2009 12:35AM EDay said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
johnnynumber5:

Don't id yourself. Once this is out, the PS3 will be flooded with "casual" crap. It might not be from Sony, but the third party publishers will open the flood gates, just like the third party pblishers did on the Wii. And there is also a chance, albeit small, that the controller will not be optional the next console cycle.

From the videos of the PS3 wand, it is no more accurate than MotionPlus. Obviously no one will be able to say for sure which is more accurate - including anyone on here - until people other than Sony actually use it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 20th 2009 1:35PM Hedgeson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Jimbo!

It's not like people only dislike motion controls if they're from Nintendo. We just have something against waggle. You can't deny that most Wii-games, which don't use MotionPlus, are not very precise in their motion detection. A flick of the wrist is enough for most games!

Furthermore, this new PS3 Motion Controller does not rip off the Wii. It's an evolution of tech Sony has been developing since the PS2.

The Wii has infrared cameras inside each controller, while the PS3 has 1 color camera on the TV. The Wii cameras are limited in their resolution, by the bandwidth of their Bluetooth connection AND to avoid being prohibitively expensive. To be as accurate as the PS3 motion controller, the Wii controllers would probably cost twice their actual price.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Mm, now this is how you do motion control.

Natalwhat?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:09PM Look At This Suit said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I don't know about that. Natal is a way more ambitious and interesting project because of the lack of a physical controller, and I respect MS for that. Sony's project here looks a lot like what the Wii should have been since day one.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:15PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
halo pony, why do you have to bash on everything thats made by ms and praise anything thats even associated with sony. theres no reason to be a raging fanboy like that.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:22PM PR0F3TA said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
El Serpiente, why do you have to bash on everything thats made by DeepFriedSushi and praise anything thats even associated with Halo Pony. theres no reason to be a raging fanboy like that.

hehe
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:25PM PR0F3TA said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Natal is a way more ambitious and interesting project because of the lack of a physical controller"

sorry for the double post, but wtf? that doesn't make it ambitious that makes it gimmiky, how many games will you have to wave your arms around, jumping up and down and holding a make believe steering wheel. BECAUSE its has no controller is why it will ultimately fail...
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:26PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
what am i bashing exactly? if anything you're the one that's as much of a fanboy has him.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:31PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Guys, why do you have to bash on everything that's to do with Bashing and praise anything that's even associated with Praise? There's no reason to be a raging fanboy like that.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:35PM Look At This Suit said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ Profeta:

Ambitious in the sense that MS is trying something that's never been tried before. I'm not saying that it's going to be a success at all, actually. We know Sony's is going to be successful because it's pretty much Wii 2.0 (Actually, more like 3.0). What we've seen of the Sony motion controller is pretty promising, and it looks like they have everything nailed down pretty well.

I just feel like Natal is way more intriguing because of the controller-free thing.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:49PM Ashitaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Look

You find Natal intriguing? See the EyeToy and the PSEye.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:56PM Sly C said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
i think natal is pretty cool. it could add some nice immersion to some games. no need to only have controllers, or only natal. why not both? and the character interaction aspect of it is unmatched. the PS wands look cool too even though they're basically good wiimotes.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:04PM aristokrat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And el serpiente pulls off the reverse hybrid double meme! What a stunning performance!
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:16PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fatality

The Serpent Wins

Flawless Victory
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:21PM Sly C said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
why did i get majorly downranked? i said both are good!
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You rang? Damn that motion control looks sweet!
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:05PM Nukem said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Still not as cool as Nathal. Looks like Sony is playing catchup.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:08PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yea...the've only been working on the Sheer physics of this since 2002-03 but THEY are the ones playing catch-up
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:10PM ArchiGamer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Isn't more MS doing catch p to Sony and more importantly Nintendo?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:16PM Liamario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please clarify
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:17PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What's a 'Nathal'?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Catch up to what?

Pretty sure all I've seen from Natal so far is an MSPaint simulator, a ball bouncing game that was done back in the NES days with Super Glove ball, and a bunch of Wii-Like hype videos that are full of promises and fairy dust.

If anything, it's Microsoft struggling to catch up to the Wii, and tripping over their own feet doing it.

Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:29PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I like the Idea of motion controls in game far more than its actual Implementation.

And Natal is a far more interesting Idea than either the Wii's or the PS3's motion controls, even though I suspect its Implementation will be even worse than those two.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 7:35PM ptcamn said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yes... Sony playing catch up to camera based controllers and motion controllers... Too bad they didn't release some sort of camera where you had to use your body as a controller back in 2003... Too bad as well they didn't release a controller that would respond to tilt, roll, and yaw back in 2006. That would have been great. ... Too bad there never was some sort of game where you could control hoverboard riders just with your body... And too bad there wasn't a game called Lifeline were the character would respond to your chatter over a microphone... Too bad that Sony never got into the video game industry back in the mid 90's. They would have been an amazing company... Too bad they are playing catch up to MS and Nintendo...
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I'm confused. What's the difference between this and the Wii?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:09PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This one actually works.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Mainly depth. Since the eyetoy is in use, it tracks where you stand in the real world. All of this and more explained in the video you just commented on. Check it out!
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:15PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's just a little more accurate, and does depth as well as tilt.

And because it uses the PSEye, it can also do face tracking, face recognition, voice controls etc., like Natal.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:17PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not really a fan of ANY motion controllers but saying this is 'just a little more accurate than the Wii controller' is sorta like calling the Great Wall of China a fence.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:17PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
functionally there is really no difference, since the wii motion plus can track orientation as well. its just that the technology is marginally different so sony can get away without patent infringing.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:25PM Hyams said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Wii Motion Plus is pretty damn accurate. Well, with tilt anyway. It can't do other stuff (mianly tracking movement in 3D space) as well as the Sony Controller, though, as it relies on the IR pointer too much and can't do depth.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:34PM Brother Unit No 4 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
HD.

:P
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 7:02PM SpartacusMagnus said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
The Great Wall of China is a fence.

There. Can I call this slightly more accurate than a wiimote now?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 9:03PM EDay said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not much apart from using the camera to superimpose graphics in the video of the player. Otherwise it tracks in 3 dimensions and orientation the same way MotionPlus does. Anyone who hasn't played Wii Sports Resort can't really say otherwise since they don't know. And anyone who has played it and says it doesn't just doesn't know much about anything.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 11:22PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
What the fuck is with the downvotes?
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2009 12:39AM EDay said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
People are touchy about their PS3s, and all of a sudden are touchy about someone criticizing motion controls now that Sony has jumped on the bandwagon.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2009 1:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can I join in on the downvote party?

Xbox sux lolol, teh Hal0z sux

PS3, psshh... more like PS-Shit (Most fanboys are this unoriginal)

Wii sux cuz it has no graphics, none at all.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:07PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm Looks like that reads Depth just fine to me...maybe not as good as 2 cameras but its doing a damn good job...
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:07PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So, when will No More Heroes come out on the PS3?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:19PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
probably never there's no analog stick.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2009 6:34PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you think you REALLY need that??
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW