| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (91)

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:42PM nukee said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I see they're still hiding the price. Probably a wise choice.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:02PM fwacce said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The over/under is currently $120 as set by the esteemed Las Vegas 64-bit Hotel & Casino.

Based on their record for pricing peripherals, I'm guessing it will be over... which is, of course, ridiculous.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:11PM MemphisNET said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
$150.00 is my guess, because Microsoft is oh-so-competitive.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:22PM EngadgetSoFunny said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed, there will probably be a overpriced!!! fanboy backlash when the price is actually released. I'm still a bit confused as to the purpose of this device since every wireless N router in the world is backwards compatible with b/g. g = 100mpbs/sec or roughly 12MB/sec. Very very few videos are encoded, even 1080p, videos are encoded at over 5MB/sec.

So 12MB/sec is still overkill if you wanted to stream two HD videos at once to a single xbox 360, which, you can't do. Nevermind the fact that xbox 360s might not even be able to handle a bit rate of 12MB/sec. Why would you need 10x that amount or 120MB/sec? So you can simultaneously stream 20 HD movies at once to your xbox 360? Right.... faster is only better if you can use the additional speed for an applicable application. In the xbox 360s case, there is none. I think the percentage of the population with an internet connection over 12MB/sec is very low as well. Perhaps in the 0.0001 percentile?

Ah well, let the e-penis perphial waging wars rage on!
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:28PM nukee said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
802.11g is 54Mbps theoretical. Real world pegs it at about 22ish Mbps. Not that great for media streaming, especially if you get poor signal.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:45PM Sly C said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
the real value in wireless N to me is the increased range.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 8:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Wes: It's not what your WAN connection is, but your LAN connection, and anyone with a Cat5 cable and another machine (plus a switch if needed) can do darn near 12MBPS. As for G being 100mbps, I think you might want to check that: G is a *theoretical* 54mbps. Realistically, it hits 22mbps... tops. More likely than not, you'll see 12. The day a G device hits 12mB/s... well, moving on.

As for 1080p video being 5mbps, I hope you're not the one doing the encoding because that's bloody murder. A retail DVD is 5-6mbps on average. An average MPEG-2 ATSC OTA stream is 18.5-solid-mbps. An average 1080p HD film is roughly 34mbps, give or take 2 for a mean average. The Dark Knight on Blu-Ray as an MPEG-2 TS was roughly about 35.5MBPS when it peaked. That's not even counting the audio stream, which, if using DTS, would've been at bare minimal 1.5MBPS; But I digress... You might be able to get away with 5mbps for a 720p video encoded with x264, but certainly not 1080p.

The point is that there are real-world applications for that kind of bandwidth. Do not forget that you can stream VC-1 videos to the 360. Some of these videos have extremely high bit-rates.

So it's not about the so called "e-penis". It's about general usability. One thing is that Microsoft apparently waited till the final specification would be clear for the N spec. That's a good thing. This will likely ensure maximum compatibility (Remember Draft-G and the dozens of different "Turbo-G" routers and adapters?) between products.

N offers greater real-world speed over G. This is a fact. N also offers greater range over G. The advantage here is for those who cannot run ethernet feasibly from one place to another, but cannot also deal with the slower real world speeds (which may be affected by a number of things including: phones, microwaves, brick walls, floors, etc.) that they would be limited to by G. That kind of interference is brutal for media streaming and online play.

Personally, I don't have a 360 but I STILLL see this as a good thing. However, Microsoft's lack of a pricing announcement leads me to believe that it will likely be priced at either the original adapters $99.99 price point or possibly $129.99.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 8:44PM SpartacusMagnus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
G networks are rated at 54Mb/s, but due to the nature of wireless, actually run more in the 18-22Mb/s range. Now take into consideration that other devices in your home can interfere with the 2.4GHz signal and the fact that most homes have more than one device using said wireless signal and you can imagine that even the 18-22Mb/s speed will not be consistent.

I had my 360 with the wireless adapter hooked up to a G wireless router that was in the next room and streaming Netflix was a pain in the butt. Almost every time it disconnected, slowed down and had to rebuffer etc. Part of that problem was the router (I hate Belkins) so I switched to a LinkSys with custom DD-WRT firmware. That made a big difference in stability, but in my house there are typically 3 laptops surfing the web at any given time which slowed my streaming down.

I ended up putting the router in the same room as my home theater and running cat5 to my 360, PS3 and PVR. Never had any problems since. Wired > any form or standard of wireless. Period.

Wireless systems are more expensive and perform worse, especially for video game systems. Just run a wire ;-)
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 9:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can get wireless N adapters that work with the 360 for less than this will cost.

My linksys dual band wireless N gaming adapter works just fine with the newest firmware and gives me great range in my house.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:43PM whookid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
R.R.P, Over 9000?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:43PM HighFiveJesus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
With the N attached, i suspect you'll be buying it for a high price.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 10:18PM Ballistic H said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You don't pay $500! Not $400! But only 3 payments of 99.99! As seen on TV... yet!
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It will still be 100 dollars.

Calling it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:49PM ummhello said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
agree. and the current adapter will drop to $79.00
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:50PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ugh, ridiculous!
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:51PM ColorblindMonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A little more out of an adapter, for the same ridiculous price.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$129
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:58PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can already get the original one on Amazon for $76.99, which I did not too long ago... and now I kind of wish I had waited.

I can't remember if my wireless router is G or N though, so whatever. No use crying over spilled milk. I rarely ever feel like I'm being bogged down by the speed of the wireless router as it is now.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
100 bucks? Fanboy! It will be 200.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:44PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
you're the fanboy if you think its going to be $200. right so they're going to sell it for the price of the console, you fail business school or something?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 7:19PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, no way they're going to sell it for the price of the console. It's going to retail for $14,774.95.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:45PM revsoul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Someone enlighten me.... If you have a "G" router and an "N" adapter for the 360, does it really matter b/c the router is only broadcasting at "G" speeds not "N" speeds, or am I missing something?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you are correct .. you can get a cheap $25 add on to make your G router N ...
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:48PM TJF said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You are correct.

Though if you are like me, and have an "N" router, then you can use it to it's fullest now.

I'll definitely consider buying this if the price isn't terribly high.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:16PM TJF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha Hivemind.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think for whatever price it will be i should just get a NETGEAR coax MoCA set up
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:54PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What if it's $10.00 ??? Huh?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:51PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
It's going to be 199.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:53PM Burritoclock said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I love my Xbox and microsoft, but damn this $100 wifi crap is ridiculous, and really shameful!

But at least it isn't something mandatory to enjoy the system to it's fullest... eh hard drive?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:45PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
i think its more of a deterrent why its priced so high. it forces people to resort the wired, one of the reasons why xbox live offer better connections compared to psn.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 9:45PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL Deepfriedsushi

It's all a big rouse, eh? They price the wireless so high because they want Live to perform better than PSN?

If you believe that you are fucking retarded.

HOPEFULLY you were joking. Knowing your comments I think you were being dead serious.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:54PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If they end up making it more expensive than the G adapter and not dropping the G in price, there's gonna be a shitstorm.

(really, the G should be included with the elite, but I guess that's too much to ask of MS)
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:56PM No Kill Tayler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sad face.
I wish it'd just replace it.
149.99 at the highest, i hope.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If you are willing to spend 150 on this, Why haven't you just bought the Linksys Wireless N gaming adapter that has been out for about 6 months now? Its around 75 on amazon and works flawlessly. Ive been running it since it came out and never had a problem.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:57PM No Kill Tayler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who said I was going to buy this?
I see no point.
I use my zune as a media player, and I carry that over to my xbox, problem solved.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:58PM brotherdaz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It would be nice if microsoft had a deal where you could trade-in your old adaptor for half off the new one or something.

I know its wishful thinking
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:03PM CaramelZappa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You could always trade it in to gamestop and get almost nothing for it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 7:10PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is such a program: eBay.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 5:59PM SecondTomorrow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For the low price of $200 because you can't use your Linksys USB adapter in our 360!
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:46PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
lol, k troll. they're going to sell it for the same price as the console, you must have dropped out of high school.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 7:08PM SecondTomorrow said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, it must be hard for you when you can't notice sarcasm. Here's a cookie for your trouble.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long as this comes out at $100, it's not too bad a ripoff.

Dual band Wireless-N bridges currently go for about $100 and require external power. Dual band USB adaptors go for about $80.

So not really that bad, provided it comes in at the same price as the current a/b/g adapter.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:22PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wireless N adapters are NOT $80. If you're paying that much, you've been scammed my friend. You can get them, in USB size even, for around $15-40. MS is just making a killing while it can off of people who don't know what a rip-off their adapter really is.

PROOF:
USB-http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833130066
-or a very nice card-
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833180052
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah but those adapters only work at 2.4 ghz, while the Xbox wifi adapter is dual-band and also supports 5ghz which doesnt interfere with your microwave oven and a ton of other devices.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 8:31PM Konrad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's still at least twice as expensive as it ought to be.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 7:12PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ha, I think you meant 5 ghz doesn't receive interference from your microwave oven. Though it'd be funny if I could cook things faster because I'm using the internet.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:01PM ch3burashka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
At TGS a Microsoft exec is going to come out with it, holding it over his head and say, "You're gonna want to get TWO jobs for this!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:08PM Jeff Kibuule said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I say $149. They want peripherals that cost almost as much as the console itself. How else would they make back the $1.5 billion they were forced to write off to pay for 3 year warranties?
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A trade-up program through Microsoft would be grand but I seriously doubt anything like that happening. Oh well I'll be buying one to match my Elite and speed up my HD content streaming.
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2009 6:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Instead of buying a wireless adapter for my Xbox, I bought an Airport Express from Apple. It extends my current 802.11n network nicely, and then I dropped a cheap $20 router on its single port. Now, for $20 more than the Xbox adapter, my Xbox, PS3, and TiVo HD are all running on 802.11n speeds, and as an added plus, I hooked the AE up to my stereo, and can stream music from iTunes to the stereo now.

It's a happy setup.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW