Remember when it was first announced that Resident Evil 5 wasn't coming to the Wii, and fans got really upset, because Resident Evil 4 on the Wii was totally awesome? It seems that decision wasn't made due to Capcom's oversight of said awesomeness -- rather, it looks like they chose to bring that experience to the PS3 with the ball-pointed PlayStation Motion Controller.
Seriously, check out this gameplay sample (video posted after the break) from Sony's TGS keynote and tell us that doesn't look exactly like RE4 on the Wii. Okay, the PS3 version is significantly prettier -- and due to the fact that Sony's controller has no nunchuck (which forces the player to hold a SIXAXIS in one hand and the wand in another) the controls look a bit more awkward this time around.
I have small hands and I can hold a DS3 in one hand and use the joystick, d-pad, R1, and R2 with no problem. On top of that, if people are really that whiny or have even smaller hands, it would not be hard at all to devise a sort of clip-on accessory to help get a better grip with one hand.
I don't get it. How is everyone ok with this? Its just not comfortable. There's so much more potential with the PlayStation 3 than the Wii, and Natal can kiss my pale butt. But, you've gotta hand it to Nintendo, they made a great controller. Granted, the PlayStation 3 Motion Controller is going to be much more responsive and I hate Nintendo anyway (SEGA guy, at SEGA's death weant Sony), this is just not very comfortable and it really doesn't make any sense. Its not laziness, why sit in a banana chair and play video games, when you can sit in a lazy boy. Really? You all want to play Resident Evil 5 like this? I'm down with the one guy who suggested an option to turn off the analog stick. In fact, its much more logical to have two wands controlling them with two hands a right motion controller and a left and playing regular games like that. But the fact another friend can use one in other games.... I like what punk suggested.
