| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (67)

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:32PM Look At This Suit said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
A pun in the very first sentence. I wouldn't expect anything less from you, Ludwig.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:00PM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I feel like an idiot, but I see no puns in the first sentence.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:20PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't think you have any idea what 'pun' means.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:26PM MDizzy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 8:22AM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
this is a true story... back when I was high school on the day we learned about puns a friend of mine wasn't paying attention. For homework we were told we had to write a few examples of puns. My friend asked another one of our friends, "What's a pun?"

He replied, "you know, it's one of those twisty tie things you use to tie bags shut"

the next day he brought a hand full of them in...I almost died.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like the game is getting a huge overhaul, a definite buy this year.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 9:00AM Vcize said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I gave you a [+] for being one of the few people in the world to know that "definite" does not have an "a" in it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 10:39AM Unit076 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Someone types "definite" with an "a"?!
Dafinite, defanate, definita? That's just doesn't make any sense!
Reply

Posted: Oct 4th 2009 2:16PM Unvrfd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I saw "definate" maybe once in my life, apparently Vcize is very careful with picking his buddies
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:33PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm, the first game had great scope but some annoying problems, seems like adressed them all and injected the game with a big dose of variety and awesomeness.

Keeping my eye on this one.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:35PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The complaints about the slow combat kind of bothered me about the first one too. He's an assassin, not a superhero, crime-fighter, or mass-murderer. If they made combat easier and more offensive, it would no longer be a game focused on assassination.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:54PM imikedaman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's great and all, but I'm pretty sure the complaints were about how shallow and rigid the combat was. All you had to do was press the counter-attack button at the right time over and over as each guard took their turn and attacked you.

For a supposedly "defense-heavy" combat engine in a supposed stealth game, they sure made it easy to just run into a large group of guards and block and counter your way to victory. Sure, you're technically using defensive moves, but that is still an aggressively offensive fighting style.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:17PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hold on, you're saying waiting to counter is aggressive?

For the most part, I liked the combat in the game, it gave you the feeling that you've been caught and you have to fight your way out of it. To me it was always more fun to fight for a bit until I had an opening, and to then make a break for it. I do agree though, that it could be a bit more elaborate.

"...they sure made it easy to just run into a large group of guards and block and counter your way to victory."

That's what I think they're trying to prevent this time around. It's important for the combat to be fun and satisfying, but it's difficult to do that while also making the player want to avoid confrontation.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 12:39AM easo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree, if anything they should have made combat more of a suicide mission. The goal of fighting should be to take out one or two guards and run like hell before the archers stick your ass to a wall.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 5:33AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A good parallel is between AC and Thief. In the latter, you're pretty much screwed if you come up against more than one or two enemies. But AC doesn't actually have many stealth elements - just climbing shit to stay above the line of sight and trying to act non-suspicious.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 9:02AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Hold on, you're saying waiting to counter is aggressive?"

No, what he's saying is that they made it too easy to run into a crowd of 30 enemies without having to worry about dying, meaning you can take an aggressive playstyle (IE just run in and kill everyone, no need to stealth your way around) without any consequences.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 3:33PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Baron

That's another thing I think they're working on, adding more depth to the stealthiness. With more options open to them, I think players will be less likely to want to just charge in.

@Vcize

Ok yea, that makes sense.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:37PM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it sounds like you can take on 20 guards again by just sitting back and countering as they take you on individually. That's disappointing. I hoped that Ubi would somehow find a way to make the combat more fluid and less context sensitive (not that I have any ideas)
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:45PM Radical Dylan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish they would find a way to punish a frontal attack, like extremely hard combat or the loss of supplies...

the way they have the combat set up now, makes you not care whether or not the guards see you, you'll just counter them all and walk away without consequence...
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:46PM Deadpool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they could make the combat as fun as Batman Arkham Asylum, that would be awesome.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:55PM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it would also have to be harder than Arkham Asylum because you're an assassin, not Batman, but I understand what you mean.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:02PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why would it have to be harder? he's like batman, but able to use blades (and if i remember right, guns later on) and kill. sounds like it should be easier to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:08PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Sly

Because the emphasis needs to be placed on the idea that you're a cunning assassin, not a brawler who gets their way by brute force. If the group combat was easier, players wouldn't feel like they need to be stealthy or clever, and so a huge aspect of the game would be lost.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:11PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It would not have to be exactly like Arkham. But I like that Batman can attack one bad guy and fluidly go into a counter of another. If AC2 also lets enzio multitask, well, that would be badass.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:25PM Sly C said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ahh, gotcha.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You could always play the game like an assassin, instead of allowing the mechanics of the game to make the decision for you. Just because you can kill them all if you get spotted doesn't mean you shouldn't care, only that you need to use your imagination in addition to the games rules.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:10PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It wouldn't be making the decision for you. Even if combat is difficult, you still always have the option of attacking head on. The designers decided that they want you to feel like it's a bad idea to do so, but it's not like they're forcing you to act on it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 12:51PM Xiard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps one option to discourage massive frontal attacks is to somehow tie a score or performance rating inversely to the number of people you had to kill. A perfect "score" would be to have made one kill: your target. Every kill you make beyond that lowers your "score". So if you run into a crowd of 30 people, you're only hurting yourself. Then you could also perhaps be increasing the replay value; if you killed 25 people while completing a mission the first time you played it, try to do it the next time with killing only 20 people.

Caveat: I haven't played the original game, so I don't know if the concept of a score or performance rating even makes sense. It was just a thought.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 3:36PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@David Cater

Yea, I think the designers are reeeaally going for immersion, so score counters are probably out. But maybe if your superiors (or clients) judged your performance, and rewarded you accordingly, that might work.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:40PM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm looking forward to this game. I loved the first one, although it was a bit repetitive at times, and hunting down the flags and such was something I didn't see the point in doing at all.

The only thing I've seen so far of this game that I really didn't care for was the flying bit, it just seemed too over-the-top and just not that much fun.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:04PM WiredKnight said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I really liked climbing around and looking for the flags, but I do think they could have made it more rewarding. Maybe in this one they could make them small stashes of gold instead?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:19PM runn1ngman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, the developer's said that he put the flags in their to screw with people who have to 100% complete a game. It was his idea of a practical joke.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:26PM MystileArmor said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well his practical joke failed, cause I like getting 100% on games, but not if it's a fucking chore.
Why would you want people to turn away from your game? Make it rewarding so people keep playing it.

Now GTA IV on the other hand, I did all that shit cause I wanted the Key To Liberty City. I have to say, it was worth the effort.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 12:10AM freaparn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Mystile

He wasn't trying to turn people away from the game, he was trying to say that random collectibles for the sake of random collectibles are ridiculous. Basically the order came down from higher up that "the kids like collectibles, so you have to put them in", and he didn't agree with that. From an interview on the subject:

“I'm not a collector person. I don't collect a lot of stuff, so I don't get it. I don't understand." I suggested he was giving the finger to obsessive collectors. "It's not the middle finger," he said. "That's too [strong], but yes, I'm playing. I'm playing with them. It's a dialogue. I need to talk also. This time there'll be something else, but I'll still be smiling in my living room."
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:43PM Radical Dylan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I borrowed the first one from a friend, but this one is a definate buy...
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 2:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looks like someone only reads his own comments:

"Vcize
Vcize @ Sep 28th 2009 9:00AM

I gave you a [+] for being one of the few people in the world to know that "definite" does not have an "a" in it."
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 3:57PM Radical Dylan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what? what are you talking about?
ooh... I misspelled a word...
I definitely won't be doing that again... //end sarcasm
Reply

Posted: Sep 30th 2009 4:56PM Danjer047 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For future reference, 'infinite' isn't spelled with an 'a' either! Just looking out for you...
Reply

Posted: Oct 4th 2009 2:21PM Unvrfd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK, twice.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:49PM Erdie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Combat's still roughly one big quicktime event, eh? Combat with guards was my least favorite aspect in the first, sounds like it will be in the second too. As long as I can still go bowling down the city streets by throwing a beggar into a crowd, I'm all set. It never got old. Either did throwing every guard that showed up into the waterways. They never learn!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:02PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What about that scifi element present in the first game? What happened to that? That was my only problem with it; I felt that it was tacked on. I didn't give a crap about what was going on in the present, and I found that it was totally unnecessary. I don't recall reading about that aspect concerning ACII.

What's the deal?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:11PM MrIronic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really liked the sci fi element of the 1st game - though I've not played all through the first yet.

I liked the combat too, maybe some places it was too easy.

Path of Neo is the only game I can think of where you could combat more than one enemy at the same time in the same moves.

Plus Batman may be good but from what I've seen of the pc demo I only had to press one button all the way through, maybe a control pad would be better, but it doesn't seem that much of a leap for me?
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 12:59AM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering the scifi elements were not revealed until reviews came out for the original's release, I don't expect it to be touched on at much if at all during the lead-up.

Hopefully we do see some progression with it (since it didn't do too much)
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:06PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is that ezio's upgraded outfit?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:06PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha, my ezio avatar showed up for the first time in forever. perfect timing.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just saw the Ezio avatar but now it's Sly! Make up your mind already, Joystiq! :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:31PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
See, this is why I just stick to my Jack avatar; I never have to worry about any darn contradictions and signs of schizophrenia.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can you ride a horse through the beautiful pastures of Italy? If so, this is a day one purchase!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:33PM ArchiGamer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I am actually a little excited for this, especially the fact that I can assassinate people in beautiful Italian settings.

Its like a dream come true!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:47PM NightElve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This reminds I have yet to finish Assassin Creed :) Just to be prepare for this one.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW