| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (42)

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 6:37AM ZayCube said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
ITS COMING TO PC!?? FUCK YE!

Im actually looking forward to this game now...
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:14AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yea me too....I might actually get it on PC instead...does it have any online component at all?? if So I DAMN sure will get it on PC
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
great to have a ps3 and a pc..right now
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 2:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FUCK! YEAH!

I had a feeling that Microsoft and Ubisoft weren't going to leave the PC gamers alone in the dark. Here comes Badass: The Game in 1920x1200 resolution!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 3:58PM R Planteer said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
PSN: John-Paul-Jones,
So you do realize that 1920x1200 is just 1080, the same resolution that the Xbox verison will be displayed at? Even if it is upscaled, losing out on cheevies and the simplicity of Xbox setup (no worrying about specs, installs, or tweaking the settings for the optimal FPS/detail combination) seems like a lot to lose.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 4:07PM petepete said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
not to mention the fact that controlling the speed of Sam via the mousewheel is the worst! this is a game that truly feels better with a controller rather than a keyboard mouse combo
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I also love my PS3, but when you match a badass rig beside your PS3/360 and seriously look at the difference, you'll know that the PC definitely wins in graphics. You may ask yourselves "Why did this PS3 loving fanboy turn a complete 180 and head to the PC?" The answer is GTA IV on the PS3. I thought to myself "This is it. If I completely want lag-free games then I'll have to go for PC gaming". In fact, GTA IV is the first PC game I bought, and it looks and feels MILES and LEAGUES better than the console counterparts. One benefit that will be extremely obvious is Crysis 2 and when it releases, go ahead and make comparisons between the console and PC screenshots and tell me which is better. I think PC gaming is only for those who have the extra bit of money and want the extra super fine detail, so you guys should stop being haters. I'm a student (a/k/a very BROKE), but I'm glad to pay the extra premium for the very high settings you'll never see on consoles. Money well spent, I'd say.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 1:46AM Sinkwater said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ swagman

Only GFW Live have achievments. GFW don't.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 6:41AM Dextro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Badass: The Game indeed!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 6:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I just hope that they forget about DA multiplayer and give us some of that CT that I love.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:08AM LuTon James said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Oh man this sounds so awesome. I hope it comes out on ps3 eventually as third party exclusives seem to be getting rarer.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:15AM Haggard said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's weird that they'd make this one exclusive at all. It's Ubisoft for starters, plus this is looking to be one of the biggest games in the next year or so - you'd think they'd want that on as many platforms as possible.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It'll probably be a shoddy port if they do do it, since it seems the SCC team made it a 360 exclusive because they couldn't be bothered learning the PS3 hardware, which means the port will probably be shipped off to some two-bit DS developer.

Maybe if you want it so bad, you should just buy a 360 (or a PC)? The 360 at least seems to get most of the better ports anyway, PC you can do spreadsheets on when you're not gaming.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:52AM LuTon James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Azerael

You may be right but I haven't played a shoddy ps3 multiplat for a long time (Ghostbusters didn't interest me). I'm more of a console gamer and I'd really like a 360, I just don't want to spend the coin, my pc is a shit box I use for the internet and Uni. There are some rad 360 exclusives that I really want to play but the ps3 caters for 95 per cent of my gaming needs. This looks so awesome I'd take a shitty port anyway :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:55AM easo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Azerael

Ubisoft Montreal was the team behind the frist Assassins Creed and Assassins Creed 2, so your "they couldn't be bothered learning the PS3 hardware" fanboy logic doesn't hold up.
My guess would be that since the studio is working on two games at the same time, and it doesnt take as many people to make a good 360 games as it does to make a good ps3 game, the decided to let a smaller team focus on splinter cell while the bulk of the studio does assassins creed 2.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:56AM Fox City said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Splinter Cell started out very focused on Xbox (and PC), and has always been tailored to the Xbox and then ported to all the other systems. Considering just how multi-platform Splinter Cell has been in the past (I think it's hit literally every platform known to man, save maybe iPhone?) it is certainly interesting that Ubisoft would decide to go this route, but not totally surprising.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The other Splinter Cells (aside from Double Agent... Or wait, I guess it was too) were on PS2 so I'm pretty sure this one will be as well, eventually.

On PS3, that is, not 2.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Easo, I actually don't own a PS3. I've got a 360 and a PC, thanks for asking. It's an unfortunate trend that many devs don't really care much for the PS3 because of its nonstandard architecture, so a lot of the time they shovel ports over to no-name developers who then botch the job.

Remember that being part of the same studio does not the same dev team make, my point that the SCC team might not feel it necessary effort to learn the PS3's architecture still stands. It's not "fanboy logic"; it's how things are. Just because I don't own the console doesn't mean I can't think the situation sucks for fellow gamers.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:28AM LuTon James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Candlejack

I bought a ps3 because I've always liked Sony and they have been my console of choice since ps1 days. As for no games...you're obviously a very sad troll with too much time on your hands. I feel sorry for you that you can't see the strenghts in different consoles and that your fanboyism blinds you from killer sony exclusives. I for a fact love titles like Gears and Crackdown and can appreciate how awesome those games are, even though they are not on the console I own.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:17AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The days of "The PS3 has no games" are LONG gone....I have 40+ PS3 games.....20 Exclusive ones....

ignorance isn't bliss...fuck what you heard
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 12:02PM easo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Azerael

I'm not sure how what console you own has any relevance to your argument. I didn't call you a Sony fanboy. I said you were using fanboy logic, and you are. Because things didn't work out as ideally as you wanted, You automatically assume that the developers are being lazy or have no understanding of how to make games work on the ps3. However, that is almost never the case.
The quality of multiplatform games has been on equal parity between the two consoles for years. I can only think of two games that had the dev team outsource the development of their ps3 port to an outside company. Half-life 2 and Bayonetta(and this game will likely suck on both consoles anyway). Hell, sometimes the ps3 ports gets delayed so long, that the end result is a better game than the original; (ninja gaiden sigma 1&2)

Also, Ubisoft Montreal has an awesome track record with multiplatform games on the ps3. They did both the ps3 and xbox 360 versions of Rainbow Six Vegas1&2, Assassins Creed 1& soon 2, Far Cry 2 and the new Prince of Persia. What makes you think they couldn't make Splinter Cell Conviction just as good on the PS3?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 12:22PM Hunter141072 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
azrael


first of all buddy face it, ps3 is not getting the best games so far, at least not in the quantities that used to with the ps2, sony was an idiot and that was the price period.
Im not a console fan boy i don´t have a console, i´m a p.c. gamer, personally i don´t love the splinter cell games but this one looks promising, more less time in shadows and more ass kicking sounds like a good idea.
and better ports on the 360? remember that games ALWAYS look better on the p.c., that´s a fact, and the times of bad pc ports are more likely than over, capcom has showed this and all the big titles that have appeared on p.c. and consoles have been perfect ports that looks 300% times better, so far so good.


see ya!!!

Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 4:49PM atrimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Conviction being a 360 exclusive had nothing to do with development familiarity, and everything to do with business. i thought this was a known by now?

Kikizo: So it's nothing to do with the project being native to Xbox 360, and porting to the PS3 being too much hassle - it's entirely a question of business.

Masters: Absolutely, yeah. Ubisoft as a company now has a lot of experience with PS3. Our processes, tools, techniques are very well-developed - we could absolutely execute on the PS3 if we had the opportunity, but like I said it was a business decision.

http://games.kikizo.com/features/splinter-cell-conviction-interview-p2.asp

i would've pulled the article from Joystiq, but for some reason their search engine isn't working. anyway, as for the game itself, well, i can't wait. easily one of my most awaited 'Q1 10 games.
Reply

Posted: Sep 30th 2009 5:14PM Danjer047 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This will definitely come off as sounding fanboy but it's true that PS3 has gotten the shaft when it comes to games. Sony has pushed it as a "do everything" box while the Xbox 360 is mainly a gaming machine that has extra features thrown in. All I ever hear about PS3 is Blu-Ray and how it has built in Wi-Fi and all of the things that don't have to do with games. Plus, since the PS1 and up until the PSP and PS2, I have had nothing but problems with Sony. They just try to find ways to rehash and make you spend more money (Microsoft is definitely guilty of this as well but that's when it comes to accessories, more often than not).

Now, there are exceptions like Little Big Planet, Uncharted/Uncharted 2, the Killzone games (but especially Killzone 2) and a few others but when compared to what the 360 offer, it is difficult for me to justify getting a PS3 even though I would love to be able to play the good games that have been developed for it. The new problem is that I don't like the look of the PS3 slim and it's matte black finish. I would have preferred the PS3 phat but just can't justify the money on it.

When it comes to multiplatform titles, the PS3 constantly gets the shaft there as well. Almost on a regular basis, reviewers have to put an asterisk saying that the PS3 version is just below the 360 version in terms of quality. A lot of the DLC is going exclusively to the 360 or at least timed exclusives and so it makes it even harder to justify a PS3 purchase.

The reason why Splinter Cell: Conviction is only on the 360 and PC is because they are similar in terms of development. The reason why it might not be on the PS3 (at least for now) is because it is harder to develop on and is more expensive (like what has been said, it takes a bigger team to work on it). It's just easier, cheaper and more cost-effective to work solely on a 360/PC version. Plus, the install base is there while the PS3 is slowly working its way up. In this economy, they just wanted to make sure that they were choosing the right way to save money.

I'm sure I'll get a PS3 some day when I really need a Blu-Ray player but I'm waiting for the day when I think of it as a gaming system rather than a "do everything" box which is difficult for me. Maybe the game companies look at it this way as well... I don't know.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:32AM Usr666 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hoping they bring back the glory days or PT and CT. What of the MP? I want the return of Mercs vs Spies.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:46AM Arsenic13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are avatar clothes for both sides so Im guessing that's a hint the multiplayer is back.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:46PM dr steve brule said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i want co-op! bring back that awesome co-op, i dont care what it does to the story, its fun.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:15AM BIGGEN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i just hope its cut scenes are something very unlike mgs4
Reply

Posted: Sep 30th 2009 5:16PM Danjer047 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What does that have to do with anything?!?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:20AM MittenFace said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that Mr. T?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 9:45AM Arsenic13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im still curious about the multiplayer. Will it be dumbed down like in DA or awesome (from what iv heard) like in Chaos?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 2:41PM robotoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't even care about a multiplayer in this game. The campaign is gonna be too kick-ass.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 10:46AM I AM IRONHIDE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NEW HAIRSTYLE: The Mohawk Mullet.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:46AM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's not new at all, that's one of the pioneering archetypes of mulletry
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 11:31AM DiamondXP said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What Happens Next....Is Up to You!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 12:25PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That phrase always gives me chills after I saw the trailer.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game is going to suck.


And by suck I mean kill you in your sleep with greatness...
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 1:05PM warxroutione said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i bet this game is gonna be like the punisher (ps2/xbox punisher games)one of my favorite games ever! im so over sold on this title i cant wait to get it!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 2:01PM CynicalStrike said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's nothing like the Punisher. That was a great game, but the action in Splinter Cell is a *touch* more low key than duel-wielding M60's and throwing people into wood chippers. It's stealth/action, not action/m0ar action.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 7:17PM warxroutione said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the things ive been reading is that its not as much as a in the shadows like stealth game however you can play it that way, but who knows i just want the game now!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2009 8:19PM Hawklight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks so awesome!
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2009 2:32AM gamerkim28 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looking forward to this badass game.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW