| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (109)

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
So instead of a generic WW2 shooter they made a generic modern-day shooter? Good job, guys.

*hides*
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:06PM Trance Addix said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yeah, it's very generic >.>
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:07PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hope you don't really believe that Neuro.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:08PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well I'll say this. I think it's possible for something to be generic and high quality at the same time.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's really not generic, the class system is incredibly well implemented, the multiplayer is extremely fun, and just really everything about is anything but generic.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:20PM Cafecito said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I actually think Modern Warfare is pretty generic... but the "Oh my god this is freakin' sweet" kinda generic. That means, nothing really new, but everything expertly done.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:22PM SamE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's as generic as monkeys flying out of my butt. The single player mode was amazing on its own, but the customization in the MP put the cherry on the cake. You need to reconsider your definition of the word "generic".
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@cafecito: Well, if you want to use that kind of thinking, then Gran Turismo, Uncharted, GTA IV, Any sports game, Street fighter, and Left 4 Dead are all generic. Not a new idea, but well done.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:42PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It depends on what you consider generic. If you just look at trailers and gameplay videos, yea, it just looks like a military shooter, big deal.

But when you start playing the multiplayer, it's so rewarding, from perks to customized loadouts. Other games have tried these, but I don't think any of them have got it as perfectly has COD4 did. Add the best matchmaking system in the industry, and you have an online experience few could match. Maybe the setting and look of the game is generic, but when you're playing it it doesn't feel like "just another shooter"
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:58PM Stumpymcdonut said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You're all getting mixed up with what he meant by generic. Yes, _it wasn't generic in the sense that it was a good game to play_, but what it is actually based on (Soldiers fighting terrorists, with class-based online team game modes - to filter it down to its simplest) was pretty damn generic. I think that's what he meant.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:04PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tracer Left 4 Dead and Uncharted were new ideas. What game had coop AND competitive in one mode like L4D? What game had combined Gears of War shooting with Jak and Daxter platforming? And yeah, as far as setting goes, Modern Combat is just as generic as WW2, and the single player campaign was just about the definition of generic, the only thing i can think of that was new in that was maybe the javelin missiles
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:23PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Neuromancer is a frickin idiot just look at the avatar that says it all!
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Some of you are really stupid. Are you having a Clinton moment with the whole "It depends on what the definition of is is."
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:52PM Cafecito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As Huehuahuehuahuehe said, I think it's generic in that exact sense: It's a military FPS set in mostly present time, and we've seen thousands of those (Modern Warfare must be the best outta the whole bunch, tho). But, WW2 shooters are even MORE generic nowadays.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 7:31PM omgwtf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well then maybe next they'll make a "generic" future shooter lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 7:40PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"the only thing i can think of that was new in that was maybe the javelin missiles"

the AC-130 and sniper levels seemed really new to me.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2009 9:30AM Walo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know why you people toss the word "generic" around like it's a bad thing. COD4 may be a "generic" shooter, but its one of the best, if not The Best one around. Remember videogames don't need to change drastically to be good, sometimes a fresh coat with a few additions and modifications and some good polish is what is needed to make a good franchise "impressive".
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2009 4:31AM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the AC-130 was just a fancy version of the bomber levels in other CoDs and war games, as for the sniping, well, if you've ever played Sniper Elite they wouldnt seem that impressive
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2009 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope everyone was as entertained by the way this all went as I was.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:04PM bongoes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Activision seriously needs to stop being so stupid.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:06PM arrrgh said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
SERIOUSLY.

They need to take off the asshat theyve been wearing like a ...medal of honour :P
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:08PM Assmar said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
It's spelled "honor" you dang foreigner.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:11PM tcc3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
its his language. You're the dang foreigner.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Does it matter? Many things can be spelled differently. Color/colour, Bobby Kotick/money grabbing douchebag. No different.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:19PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The Medal of HONOUR series and WWII shooters can still be done well, but I'm pretty sure everyone is glad that the new game is set in modern times. CoD4:MW is a lot of gamers' FAVOURITE all-time game. Everyone in my NEIGHBOURHOOD still plays it almost every day. Having it set in modern times just adds some much needed COLOUR to the series.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:27PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think that "Honor" must be used here if it's a play on words regarding the Medal of Honor game series.

Unless, of course, that is how they spelled it on the box in the land of "ours" not "ors"
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:16PM maveric101 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
well Joystiq is based in the US i think, so technically "honour" would be the "foreign" term here... not that i care at all. i can't believe that guy bothered to say anything.

also, fuck activision
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:19PM maveric101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
also, you know what they say... hindsight is 20/20. corporations are generally hesitant to try new things, and for good reason.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I know.

Activision is made up of self-promoting assholes.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:05PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I want to see the market survey that told them to stay in the WW2 genre. I just don't believe it existed.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:10PM darkinchworm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm probably going to be set on fire for this one, but...

Maybe they polled Jews?
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:13PM Joeybeast said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Look how well World at War sold. That market research probably did exist.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:16PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You mean because W@W was a skin of CoD4 with a fun co-op mode? I think that and the name is what sold W@W.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:16PM JeezWhiz87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IS THAT A COPYCAT?!
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:25PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@dark,

Wow really? You make a comment like that and it's considered humorous and get's up voted? Well, then again this is joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 7:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@wages
Know what the best part about Jew jokes are? We (Jews) came up with the funniest ones. Guess who coined the term self-hating Jew? Again, us jews. Frankly, I found his joke pretty damn funny. Although if he had said gassed instead of set on fire, I might have laughed even louder.



Hi, I'm Avatar. I'm Jewish and I approve this message.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2009 1:13AM darkinchworm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Try not to take offense, for I discriminate equally.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:06PM Cheesus Crust said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its natural, I'm guessing ANY company wouldn't want a cash cow to try something totally diff from their current(and successful) work, but in the end since they provided funding for it, it's all good.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:07PM SamE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I officially hate Activision now T_T
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:09PM HeavyToka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I still want a Vietnam game
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:09PM HeavyToka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn Joystiq commenting system!
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:11PM SamE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would you replace it for CoD4?
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're just now hating Activision? Activision is this generation's EA. EA got their act together and it paid off.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:13PM HeavyToka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
of course not
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:45PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So does that mean next generation Activision will become the great company that EA currently (mostly) is?

I wonder who's going to be the day old used bag of douche next time around.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 6:43PM qbert18 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ubisoft is next in line; Activision was kind of awesome when EA was evil, and Ubisoft is kind of awesome now, so...
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2009 8:12AM Angry Frank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA got its act together. Activision got Blizzard.

Apples and oranges.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:08PM TonyRockyHorror said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I quit playing WWII shooters when Day of Defeat went to the Source engine.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I quit playing WWII shooters after COD 2
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2009 5:08PM PR0F3TA said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The people at Activision are a bunch of tards who think they know us better then we know ourselves... but people will still buy their games then talk shit about how they milk franchises and sell us useless plastic peripherals.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW