| Mail |
You might also like: WoW.com, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (89)

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:10PM MarkezJM said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Oh how I loathe Twitter. I think it'll be neat to check out how Faceboook works on Live, but I kinda doubt I'll be going back to it often and/or ever. I'm mostly just interested in photo albums, likely... I finally caved and put in my first stupid 'status update' or whatever on my page trying to find someone to go see the Pearl Jam show with last night, but to no avail :*(
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldve gone with you Markez. I wouldve gone.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:36PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unfortunately I couldn't really head up to LA on a Wednesday night to see it with my buddy who is also pretty hardcore into PJ, and he couldn't head down to San Diego for the show last night :( They always put on such a fantastic show. I guess Ben Harper and Jerry Cantrell both sat in on a few songs in Wednesday's show. I get the impression they'll be touring for a long time so I'm sure they'll come around again.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 4:27PM ray954 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dude, twitter is just like an rss feed for my phone. its good to follow senior espn writers + joystiq and teamxbox. who by the way gives out free xbla title codes and map packs and stuff via twitter (team xbox). your thinking of the lame user who "tweets" his activitys, which is uber gay. i will not have any use really for the twitter app via xbox 360 but the svc alone is very resourceful.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think this is going to be the first big dash update ever that has nothing that's worthwhile to me. To make things worse this will probably slow the dashboard and store down again too.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:54PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yup, and two more channels that will clutter up the interface and no way to customize or remove stuff you don't care for.

DO NOT WANT!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sort of want
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 4:30PM ray954 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
obie, stop struggling and just conform quietly please
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 4:33PM MarkHawk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys don't want instant 1080p? Im greatly looking forward to the Zune integration.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree, sort of want but a option to remove whatever I want.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 7:04PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ray954: NEVAR!!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:12PM rob47 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Twitter in the UK is no where near as big as in the US. We want a netflix equivilent not facebook and twitter.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel for you. I'm not trying to rub it in but honestly the Netflix inclusion into the 360 is what I'd say is the biggest possible sell of the machine besides the fact it plays games.

I would take this over inclusion of Blu-Ray / HD DVD player ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.

I agree, get that shit settled and get Netflix on EVERY 360 no matter where people live.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
so does Sky Player not do it for you then??
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 4:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Try living in Canada where you get exposed to US & UK culture, but get NO netflix, skyplayer or any extra features on the 360 dashboard....

We pay more for XBL & MS points and somehow get a lot less....
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:08PM rob47 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol skyplayer isnt working yet and besides... if i wanted to watch sky i wouldnt be playing Xbox i'd be watching TV.

@Oxy
What wins? US or UK culture?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:30PM mynk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
uk music
us tv.

both equally good at games,
but us more for 360
and uk more for ps3
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:32PM rob47 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We have terrible music. Coldplay *shudder*
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:13PM sonofman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
YouTwitFace.....
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:24PM Peter Moore said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Conan O'Brien references are always welcomed.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
absolutely no need for this on Live.

"SuchandSuch is playing xbox"

who cares?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:17PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Apparently a lot of people, or else they wouldn't have developed it.

Plus, it's free advertising :)
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:23PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But I'm pretty certain that facebook isn't going to automatically broadcast whatever you're doing on you're 360, is that what you're suggesting?

I don't care, I'm with you, but I seem to be seeing quite a few people of the mind that facebook is going to tell the world whenever you're playing xbox.

I mean, it doesn't do that, right? Anyone? I thought not I guess...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:34PM WINterfang said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it will be like this.

Example:

Hey has anybody seen zombieland? how was it?
frederick from Xbox 360.

~I think it was alright, I didn't like it.
Kathye from facebook Blackberry.

~ I love it! it's awesome
Pablo ferrero vistahermosa parmesano from Iphone.

Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just assumed it would broadcast it like the default MSN messenger settings. Which were annoying as hell.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:52PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"But I'm pretty certain that facebook isn't going to automatically broadcast whatever you're doing on you're 360, is that what you're suggesting?"

Of course not, no, that wasn't what I was suggesting. 360 facebook updates will surely be like Uncharted 2 twitter updates: http://www.consolemonster.com/images/news/uc2twit2.jpg

What I'm saying is: those who choose to update their facebook will help the 360 by advertising it indirectly. That's a good thing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Facebook Status: "is sick with the swine/avian/sars flu, needs sleep."

"Vladeon just beat Assassin's Creed 2 and got an Achievement for it worth 50p."

Vladeon's Boss: pack your stuff, you're fired.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:00PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was referring to dude above you, but that's kinda neat the way U2 does that.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:12PM WINterfang said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But Vladeon you can play games while you are sick, just not wii sports of something like that.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:14PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
win, i'm pretty sure getting sick right when a major game comes out, and playing it counts as just a bit suspicious...
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2009 9:21AM borland502 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"win, i'm pretty sure getting sick right when a major game comes out, and playing it counts as just a bit suspicious..."

Well, that depends if one's boss is a gamer. Surprisingly, that is not always the case.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:20PM MowDownJoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FACEBOK!

*Psst... fix the typo.*
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Umm, FacePalm?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:18PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um, they actually did change it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:54PM MowDownJoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um... you need to reread the article. Specifically, right underneath the picture.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 6:20PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"upcoming Facebok/Twitter/Last.Fm update for Xbox Live"

Is what he was referring too.

I don't often see them make corrections, even when they mess up on an in-network link. I guess most people ignore it or post the correct quote/spelling/link.etc,
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:22PM abelpc said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't complain about ADDING features.. if you are not interested in the feature.. DON"T USE IT..

Would you prefer that Features are REMOVED.. or NOTHING added at all?


I don't understand why anyone would complain about new features that are not going to cost you anything..especially since you have the choice to not use them.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:24PM abelpc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oh.. and don't go with the "But you have to pay a monthly Fee" argument cuz:

1. The features are not increasing the Live fees.
2. Crying about the Live Monthly fee has gotten old.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:26PM MarkezJM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's very old and tired, however it'll always be a staple of arguments against the box, much like peanut butter is a staple of fine sandwich making.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:28PM abelpc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
mmmm... Peanut Butter! Now I need to go make a Sandwich.. hehe
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:43PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed, Markez. It will always be a valid argument, so throw in your Microsoft branded earplugs if you don't like it. Just like those who are welcome to not use any features added to Xbox Live. You are welcome not to listen to those who don't agree with paying for such a service.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:56PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lolm we're agreeing that it's a valid argument are we?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ abelpc:

Well, I think the main consensus is that if you're putting resources on creating Facebook / Twitter implementation, those are resources that aren't available for creating something that people actually give a shit about.

Of course, that's assuming that resources are limited, which obviously isn't the case, right?

Just playing devil's advocate and providing an obvious answer but hey, you did ask and I was always told, "There's no such thing as a dumb question" (lucky for you).
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:49PM abelpc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@D Dogg

what features would you give a shit about then?

I don't really care about Facebook or Twitter.. but I am not going to complain about them being added.

I do look forward to last.fm.. I think that is cool. And Video chat will be interesting so I can chat with my family in the other part of the country.

I personally am indifferent about the additions but I am not going to say be upset about adding more.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh, if only Microsoft had made the Xbox emulation software useable for games other than Halo instead of worrying about this.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 2:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
THANK YOU! Jesus Christ I'm glad there are others who are still wondering why we can have avatars on Xbox 360's but can't play Metal Gear Solid 2 from the original Xbox on our 360's.

W
T
F
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:12PM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but imagine if only you understood that getting old games (that squeezed every bit of performance out of the aging hardware they originally ran on) to work on a different processor and graphics chip set is far more complex than writing a Twitter client.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 5:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
And imagine if the company responsible is already familiar with programming emulators to make older programs run with their software. Not to mention they had a triple-core CPU, a much more powerful GPU, and eight times the RAM to play around with...yeah, you're right. Impossible.

*facepalm*
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2009 4:27AM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But yet, even with all that power, they don't fully handle emulation. Hey, I'd love it too if full emulation had happened. But do you really think that if it was as easy as making a Twitter client, MS would just stop short of emulating all of those gems you want to play? No. It's not like they just cranked up the power of the xBox from 6 to 10 when they made the 360. Different machines with the evolutions of the 360 being focused on slightly different powers. Later games in a console's life often use the outer fringes of programming tricks and loopholes that are specific to that hardware, in this discussion the xBox, squeezing the best out of that old hardware that they know inside and out, as well as using graphics chipsets that might not be legal to emulate with software as they broke ties with Nvidia when they went with ATI for the 360.

Switching from the older machines to the new next gen is obviously going to give companies like Sony and MS more power, but with the 360 and the PS3, it's still not enough to emulate chips that are not physically there. I offer up the inability for the PS3 to properly emulate the PS2 games that it could when it actually had the chips from the PS2, and I remember when an xBox game like Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory was finally supported - the higher resolution was cool but it also ran slower in parts like the rain on the outside scenes. The emulated game ran slower than the game on the xBox and certain graphics tricks used on the xBox (like the 'optical camo' in SC:CT multiplayer) showed up as glitches on the 360.

C'mon son. Think it through. Take your *faceplam* cliché and leave it at the door - the 360 and the PS3 are powerful, but still not powerful enough to fully and correctly emulate last gen's games with only software.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2009 1:44PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL Facebook
LOL Twitter

What a waste.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

WoW

Massively

Big Download

Autoblog

Urlesque

Games.com Blog

UGO.com