If Crytek's, like, next next-gen-ready CryEngine 3 performs even half as well as advertised, then the tears are gonna flow -- tears of joy. Imagine an engine through which a developer, using a single editor and dev PC, can create and test a game for PC, Xbox 360 and PS3 ... at the same time. (You don't even have to imagine it, actually; there's a video after the break!) That's the picture Crytek's painting as it today releases its third iteration of the CryEngine for license to third-party developers.
As promised in the press release: CryEngine 3 features real-time conversion and optimization of assets and cross-platform changes that "significantly" reduce the risk (and headache) of multiplatform development. So, in layman's terms, it renders really good graphix -- even if you have no idea how to develop on PS3.
"With its scalable graphics and computation it is next-gen-ready and with new features like CryEngine 3 Live Create the best choice for game developers and companies developing serious games applications alike," trumpets Crytek boss Cevat Yerli. "It is the only game engine solution that enables real-time development and can ensure teams are able to maximize their own creativity, save budget and create greater gaming experiences."
Okay. So what's it cost?
Reader Comments (142)
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:25PM devin 42 said
OK...that's fucking awesome.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 5:11PM a dark day said
we need to combine this with Frostbite destruction 2.0.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 7:36PM RagingStormX said
All I know is that EA publishes Crysis and they do for BLACK, so I pray to the dear Lord that BLACK 2 uses this engine (even though they are not the developers). Looks like some good RPG's can make good use of this too (I am looking at you SE, since you has defiled yourself with the Unreal Engine in the past)
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:20PM (Unverified) said
Im sure satin was involved in the development of this engine.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:23PM Discotheque said
Who the hell is "Satin"? Is he in any way related to "Satan"?
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:25PM (Unverified) said
i dunno, i think Crytek are more fans of velvet
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:27PM (Unverified) said
Yes, high gloss fabrics are a must in today's engines. I simply wouldnt dream of developing without wearing some quality weave
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:28PM (Unverified) said
Gah, that was a terrible, but humorous mistake, and on my first post too.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:31PM BananaBoat said
I spend my nights in white satin, if you know what I mean.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:32PM (Unverified) said
If 00:19-25 and 1:00 mark can really be accomplished on PS3 and Xbox360. I'm buying Crysis2 the first day it comes out...
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:43PM EngadgetSoFunny said
@Internet Superhero
Har Har Har, xbox 360 and ps3 both can't produce graphics anywhere near this level. On the crysis forums, its already been stated that all the video created was created using a PC equipped with 2 ATI Radeon 5870 in crossfire. In lamen terms, that's at least 12x the power of the xbox 360 GPU and 15x the power of the PS3's GPU.
Reply
Har Har Har, xbox 360 and ps3 both can't produce graphics anywhere near this level. On the crysis forums, its already been stated that all the video created was created using a PC equipped with 2 ATI Radeon 5870 in crossfire. In lamen terms, that's at least 12x the power of the xbox 360 GPU and 15x the power of the PS3's GPU.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:51PM BananaBoat said
@wes - Link? It says very clearly on the video "Xbox 360" and "PS3" which would lead anyone to believe that the games were running on those platforms. Why would they create a video using a PC, then label it 360 or PS3, when it is obvious that they'd get caught eventually (especially if they were going to admit it on a forum?)
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 4:34PM Chaz Winterbottom said
I'll say it again. Never mind satin. Where the hell is my chiffon?!?!?!
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 5:00PM Deschain said
@ BananaBoat
It's already been said pretty openly that the console version of Crysis 2 will be about half to 3/4 as detailed as the PC version (on Very High settings). The demo is clearly on the PC, although they do say 360 and ps3; they are simply showcasing that it works on the 360 and ps3 as well. It's just wishful thinking if you believe the 360 or ps3 version of Crysis 2 will look that good.
Reply
It's already been said pretty openly that the console version of Crysis 2 will be about half to 3/4 as detailed as the PC version (on Very High settings). The demo is clearly on the PC, although they do say 360 and ps3; they are simply showcasing that it works on the 360 and ps3 as well. It's just wishful thinking if you believe the 360 or ps3 version of Crysis 2 will look that good.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 8:18PM Jin Saotome said
@BananaBoat : Notice how the scenes that say Next Gen Ready have no console attached to it. These are most likely PC scenes under DX11. By comparison, the 360 and PS3 scenes shown look like the regular dark and brown stuff you usually see. This is not really new though CryEngine 3 was showcased a while ago with screenshots and while the consoles versions are impressive, they were missing a lot of detail in distant areas (as in, no trees, limited visibility) and foliage (less trees, grass, bushes, etc).
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:21PM KungFuChaosNinja said
This engine looks absolutely stunning and is sure to "wow" console gamers. The lighting is amongst the best I've seen on consoles. I can't wait to see what magic it'll work on the PC, though. It'll be something to see, that's for sure.
Posted: Oct 18th 2009 10:41AM (Unverified) said
Lets hope this engine produces more shades of grey, cos personally I was disappointed with how many shades of grey this gen had.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:44PM EngadgetSoFunny said
This video was made on the PC not the consoles I'm afraid. Your SOL.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 4:11PM KungFuChaosNinja said
Oops, forgot to hit reply last time.
Anyways, I'm a PC gamer, so that doesn't matter to me. I was just saying that it's going to be amazing to see what Crytek can do on consoles.
Reply
Anyways, I'm a PC gamer, so that doesn't matter to me. I was just saying that it's going to be amazing to see what Crytek can do on consoles.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 4:23PM Humppakummitus said
domo:
You're actually right. We've been stuck at 256 shades of gray for over a decade. Any single color scene still looks like crap. We need more bits per pixel.
(Yes, yes, you were being edgy. Still right, though)
Reply
You're actually right. We've been stuck at 256 shades of gray for over a decade. Any single color scene still looks like crap. We need more bits per pixel.
(Yes, yes, you were being edgy. Still right, though)
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 4:28PM BananaBoat said
I went to the Crysis forums and looked, but I didn't see any mention of this new trailer, or it being done on the PC. The obvious conclusion is that there is a trolling in progress. If anyone was actually fooled, I'd disregard the false information until proof is provided.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:21PM (Unverified) said
Looking forward to it, we need games on more than just the Unreal engine.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:41PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
CryEngine3 wont be that hard on PCs....if your PC is no more than 3 years old it should be fine
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 10:51PM AdamSpruijt said
Chris man, three years is a bit of a stretch, but it will indeed be heavily focused on efficiency. Id say any recently purchased (1 year ish?) gaming rig should so well enough.
Reply
Posted: Oct 15th 2009 1:04AM maveric101 said
Chris may not be far off... if i remember correctly, CryEngine 3 wasn't supposed to be graphically superior for CryEngine 2. it's purpose is the easy multiplat stuff.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM (Unverified) said
Sounds like great big news.
no excuses for a developer now not have all versions of a game looking similar...
this should save them a lot of time and money. who knows how much this license is though ?
no excuses for a developer now not have all versions of a game looking similar...
this should save them a lot of time and money. who knows how much this license is though ?
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 4:33PM Ubiquitous Oxymoron said
4 million euros to license the previous cry engine,( royalty free) and the unreal engine 3 = $1 million + 17.5% royalties on all units sold
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM Rhamsey said
Shit, that's impressive.
Posted: Oct 15th 2009 6:53AM (Unverified) said
Yeah, PlayStation 3 realMyst (or any of the Myst titles) using CE3 would be awesome.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
now I wonder how many people are going to use this....appears that it would be extremely beneficial to cut development time
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 5:19PM Sho Minamimoto said
Who did you piss off? All of your post seem to be downvoted for no reason.
Reply
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 5:32PM BananaBoat said
I was wondering the same thing. It seems like all of your posts are downvoted today. Conspiracy?
Reply








