Even if you don't watch the video above, you should take one thing from it: The "worldwide embargo" gets lifted this Thursday and a flood of information on the game is sure to follow. If you're really trying to remain spoiler-free on BioShock 2, now may be a good time to go dark.
Even if you don't watch the video above, you should take one thing from it: The "worldwide embargo" gets lifted this Thursday and a flood of information on the game is sure to follow. If you're really trying to remain spoiler-free on BioShock 2, now may be a good time to go dark.
Reader Comments (30)
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 4:35PM Benjamin Gilbert said
YOU forgot the PC tag! Alright, okay, so I might've forgotten the PC tag. It's up there now. Happy?! Are you?! I mean ... thanks! :P (no, seriously, thanks. that was dumb of me.)
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 3:46PM (Unverified) said
Is this being developed with the PS3 being the lead platform?
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 9:41PM (Unverified) said
No, it's being developed with the 360 and PC in mind. It's too much work to make it for the PS3 as developers have a hard time coding for that giant.
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 4:10PM (Unverified) said
My mind has just been blown. Big Daddys with chain guns and rocket launchers? and a new look? AWESOME.
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 4:25PM (Unverified) said
No doubt the game will be great but I really hope they have a better end boss this time around. That was a pretty big let down with the first game.
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 4:37PM zlickrick said
If there is one game I wish they'd never make a sequel of, it'd be Bioshock.
I loved the first one and surprisingly there was a great deal of closure in beating it. Now it seems as if 2K have taken the Cliffy B approach to this second installment by adding more "kick ass" to it. Sure, the initial "wow factor" sells the pre-orders, but really, does anyone expect this game to compete with the original? Do we really need to go back to Rapture?
Reply
I loved the first one and surprisingly there was a great deal of closure in beating it. Now it seems as if 2K have taken the Cliffy B approach to this second installment by adding more "kick ass" to it. Sure, the initial "wow factor" sells the pre-orders, but really, does anyone expect this game to compete with the original? Do we really need to go back to Rapture?
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 5:07PM (Unverified) said
Well I for one was always wondering what was going on in Rapture after the events of the first one.So I can't wait to step into the shoes of ''the first big baddy''.
I'd hate to have to visit Rapture a 3rd time after this but if they do make another I'd like it to be a prequel, where you witness ''The Fall Of Rapture'' that would be awesome.( maybe you'd be Fontaine )
Reply
I'd hate to have to visit Rapture a 3rd time after this but if they do make another I'd like it to be a prequel, where you witness ''The Fall Of Rapture'' that would be awesome.( maybe you'd be Fontaine )
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 4:57PM dogmaticatheist said
BioShock is a game that doesn't seem like it needs multiplayer.
Reply
Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:35AM polysix said
"I'd rather have a quality single player experience than a mediocre one with tacked on multiplayer."
I'd rather have both (Check Uncharted 2 for a good example). Unfortunately Bioshock 1's single player 'experience' could hardly be termed fun (esp on PC where everything that could be borked, was borked in that shoddy port). The only good thing about it was it's location, premise and SOME of the story and SOME of the graphics. The rest was like art-deco 'whack a mole' with that wrench and flaky/soft animation. When you play a GOOD solid game (HL2, U2, Resi 4) then go to Bioshock - you really notice how shit the whole thing FEELS to actually play. But if collecting tapes and gorking at water is your bag then I'm sure it really was a 10/10.
Reply
I'd rather have both (Check Uncharted 2 for a good example). Unfortunately Bioshock 1's single player 'experience' could hardly be termed fun (esp on PC where everything that could be borked, was borked in that shoddy port). The only good thing about it was it's location, premise and SOME of the story and SOME of the graphics. The rest was like art-deco 'whack a mole' with that wrench and flaky/soft animation. When you play a GOOD solid game (HL2, U2, Resi 4) then go to Bioshock - you really notice how shit the whole thing FEELS to actually play. But if collecting tapes and gorking at water is your bag then I'm sure it really was a 10/10.
Posted: Oct 27th 2009 12:35PM dogmaticatheist said
Well if adding deathmatch multiplayer that people will play for a month and then abandon is your bag, you're entitled to your opinion.
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 5:30PM (Unverified) said
Holy crap, they really knocked it up a notch.......BAM!
So looking forward to this now.
Reply
So looking forward to this now.
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 5:37PM TheDarkWayne said
Siren Alley? That's totally where all the hookers are
Reply
Posted: Oct 26th 2009 7:57PM arrness PSN chsowls Steam dcdani said
man...
if not for MW2 this would be out...
Reply
if not for MW2 this would be out...
Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:30AM polysix said
Physics still looked capped (non smooth/jittery), gunplay still looks 'soft' (non pleasing and non addictive), Effects still look overly garish and simple (welcome back to 1998), game still looks to be more about hype and story than solid gameplay.
no thanks
Reply
no thanks
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments
