| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (30)

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:02PM Apollo26 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You forgot to censor the Penis.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:14PM s ls said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn you! quit reminding us about that just when I got that out of my mind its back
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:14PM bxgt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But he just got first comment, OH YEA I WENT THERE.Can somebody cut the chain....because i am off it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:22PM x Prime x said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What pe-

OH....OMG!!!

MY EYES I CANT UNSEEN
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:27PM Zertoss said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It took me a sec, but I'll be damned if that isn't a penis.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 6:37PM AntiVillian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to see this penis! but I can't find it ;.;
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want my full violence mode.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 1:16AM CubeGuy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell are you guys talking ab-

Oh. My. GOD!
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:04PM Marco le Polo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it better to be safe or sorry?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:06PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The black hand looks even more like a gun now.

Censorship FAIL.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:09PM Giroro said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What? Just because a hand is black you assume it's holding a gun?

Stop being so racist.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:21PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You must be from Australian Censorship Board.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:07PM kevin949 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So the OFLC stated that in L4D2 you couldn't discern enough from the zombies and humans and that basically made it not pass. But in borderlands where you are CLEARLY shooting off limbs and heads of humans it is ok. I'm so confused by their logic. Or maybe Valve needs to make the zombies look perfectly human.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:18PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't played Borderlands, but I did get the L4D2 preorder demo today. Given that Borderlands has a much more stylized err..style, i doubt it would accommodate the same exposed ribcage, heart, stomach, intestines, and spines that L4D2 does. Also, i dont know the extent of Bordelands melee capabilities, but I think I'll be safe in assuming they're at least slightly less graphic than decapitating zombies with machetes and electric guitars
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:45PM kevin949 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, in borderlands I can shoot a guy in the head with a sniper rifle and watch his entire body explode in a glorious show of bits and pieces and blood. Not to mention splattering people in the car, or popping heads with a "critical strike" of my melee weapon. Shooting off limbs and such. It is fairly graphic, to say the least. A different type of graphic than L4D2 I imagine, but still graphic. Though really I think the OFLC is just power crazy over games anyway. So it goes, I guess.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 6:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its more to do with L4D being much more realistic. Borderlands, while it may have about 10 times the gore from what I've seen, is undoubtedly unrealistic in its style, whereas L4D2 (sounds like a Star Wars droid) is almost photorealistic. Plus, L4D2 has a much more serious tone to it. You shoot a zombie in the head in L4D2, you're lucky if its head explodes, let alone the whole damn zombie.
Maybe the realism, and I use that term loosely (zombies people! they dont exist.... yet.), is what got L4D its rating?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:26PM kevin949 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's possible. I don't know the ins and outs of their rating methods. It just seems quirky to me at best.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:07PM Giroro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Now, with luck, Australia will have the exact opposite problem with Left 4 Dead 2's launch."

I was actually thinking that they might do something along those lines. Once the game is past the Aussie board of review, not much is stopping them from quietly re-enabling violence as part of a DLC pack(xbox) or whenever they feel like it (PC).

for that matter, they could release a violence patch as a "third party mod" and let Aussie players manually fix the game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 6:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know what the laws are in Australia, but if they're anything like the US and they do that, expect a quick yank from the shelves and a rerating, รก la Oblivion. And that wasn't even from a change made by Bethesda.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So.... I don't understand. All of this censorship for all these games & then the banning.... Are Australians some kind of crazy nation of psychopaths that can be sent over the edge into murderous rage with just one wrong image?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:52PM kevin949 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You do know of australia's history, correct?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:52PM OZJD said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kevin is right. Once the United States stopped taking all those convicts, they had to find somewhere else. So they split them up and sent to other parts of the Empire. Australia was one of them.

Oh, we never received any where near as many British convicts as North America. Not even close.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:39PM Swifter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
bloody mess
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 4:56PM ScottG13 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What a nation of puss. Sorry, you guys have to turn in the Man Card.

With a nation with such a cool history, they really have a sad need for censorship.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 5:45PM xaduurv said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The vast majority of us aussies don't want such censorship. The problem is that to change the law there has to be a unanimous vote of the Attorneys General and there's ONE against the change. South Australian Attorney General Michael Atkinson is spoiling it for the rest of us. There was a public discussion paper on the issue and, because he didn't like what was in it, he censored it...
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:28PM kevin949 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Majority rule>unanimous. That sucks.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 9:59PM OZJD said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glenn said "The problem is that to change the law there has to be a unanimous vote of the Attorneys General and there's ONE against the change."

This is incorrect.

The states do not need a unanimous consensus. They have agreed to have one!

There is a huge difference. Any of the states could say stuff this were bringing in R18. However in doing so, the existing agreement to try to keep state laws uniform would go out the window, and many other resolved issues would come back to plague the state governments. They don't want to return to the previous levels of uncooperative behaviour, so the S.A. Attorney General is holding them to ransom with his refusal of R18.

He's a C#@T.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I like how everyones ragging on Australias ratings board censoring games, and not a word about Germany. BLUE FREAKING BLOOD PEOPLE! At least Australia seems to understand that while it may look blue in your veins, it isn't when you get your head blown off. Even if they do seem to have Attorney Generals who are Virtuhemophobic. Thats a fear of virtual blood by the way. Knowing being half the battle and whatnot.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 7:55PM Brendan H said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just have one thing to say about Australia's OLFC:
Those lousy, misguided mother...

...and the horse they rode in on.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2009 8:17PM Snappyguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd prefer Sir Head-tilts-a-lot to....whatever Borderlands is supposed to be.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW