| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (216)

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Pfft. That's just violence. I think they'll be more upset about the same sex relations you can have in Dragon Age: Origins.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That is, Fox News in the US will be upset. The rest of the countries in the world will be upset about the violence.

Man, all you other countries are backwards.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, who wants to see gay sex? The parts don't even fit together!
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:44PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh, I'll make it fit Brad.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Captain Planet? Peter Moore?

I'm shocked!

Actually not you Peter, you seem up for anything. I figure it's just how you roll.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*tries to picture Captain Planet 'making it fit', pukes*
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:35PM phinn said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
This is unreal.. I don't know how anyone could want this game now. In the video you PLAY as a terrorist gunning down people screaming for their lives in an airport. That's beyond sick, especially as someone that lives in east Jersey grew during 9/11. No way am I getting this crap game now. I was already on the fence after they said they aren't going to have dedicated servers or free maps like last time.

Too many other good games anyway to deal with that crap. Uncharted 2, Demon's Souls, ODST, and Bad Company 2 coming out next year.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I find it an interesting twist. Are you insulted by the fact that you participate in it rather than just watching it?

Interesting. I'm actually not sure how I'll feel when I play this to be honest. I know it's a game, but they're hitting something emotionally.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:46PM Sly C said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"This is unreal.. I don't know how anyone could want this game now. In the video you PLAY as a terrorist gunning down people screaming for their lives in an airport. That's beyond sick, especially as someone that lives in east Jersey grew during 9/11. No way am I getting this crap game now. I was already on the fence after they said they aren't going to have dedicated servers or free maps like last time."

calm down, it's just a game. it's just a part of the narrative. i guess it's interactive to drive the point across even more. the way you phrased it made it sound like manhunt 2 - all killing for the hell of it. in the game, it shows the horror of terrorism from a first person view. remember that you get the option to skip the part or you can just let the others kill the civilians while you watch if you so choose.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:49PM PubeLess said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
spoilier alert? just in case

i know no one believes me i dont care. i have played one of the copys. the consoles are OUT IN PLACES with the game. anyways this level is very kinda intense. the beginning is just nuts you take down like 60 people in 2 seconds. AND YOUR NOT ALOUD TO RUN. so you cant just run threw the part, you have to walk ( sit threw it practically) JUST like you would if you were in the persons position. but so far the game is pretty cool. its NOT MUCH upgraded in gfx tbh. the guns are great, and everything up close is great. but the same gfx problems MW1 had are in MW2. anyways ya ill stop here.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:50PM PubeLess said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
lol aloud... wow im dumb.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 8:22PM Kodros said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"In the video you PLAY as a terrorist gunning down people screaming for their lives in an airport."

Oh come on, we've all shot/beat/burned/ran over civilians in GTA games.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 8:36PM R Planteer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*Activates planet power*

Ill help it all fit together.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 9:04PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The only thing that annoys me is that people were up in arms because of the game about fallujah was being made yet the attitude about this is it's just a game.

It's ALL just a game. I hate double standards and censorship.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 11:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I Love this that their making it where you see it thew the eyes of a madman that just show how smart, daring, & jut how D*MN good they are at IW.
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2009 12:06AM usualyksint said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Killing people is killing people, everyone is a civilian at the end of the day.
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2009 11:18AM amart89 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Has everyone seen the footage? .. honestly .. I was hoping the joystiq community woudlnt be all "its jsut a game blah blah"

The footage I saw made me really uncomfortable, as in there are people crawling and trying to save their loved ones, while you shoot them and blood spatters everywhere. Or how about when their are people standing in line to buy tickets, a WHOLE crowd, and you just start cutting them all down.

Seriously we all know kids under the allotted age play these games.. cough cough halo ... cough... And do you really think any kid is gonna take the responsibility to skip said scene? NOPE. its undeniable that IW and Acti. are exposing people to such horrors that do not need to be potrayed in a GAME.

To anyone claiming that its the same as GTA, its not. Jesus you are shooting up an airport... which is something of a soft spot for just about everyone. It honestly reminds me of an almost-school shooting we had...

IF people on this site are unable to recognize the severity, well it just shows a lack of responsibilty in more ways than one. For instance, why is everyone here trying to defend their game, when what we should be doing is defending ourselves as gamers! You think when someone actually shoots up an airpoort and admits to playing this game that THE DISC is gonna get all the flac? nope it'll be gamers in general. Think about it at least; this kind of content makes us all look bad.

I'll still buy the game for the insanely promising multiplayer, however I for one will be skipping this scene (there better not be an achievement for it lol). Im not saying I condemn those who don't, go ahead, maybe you'll be able to jusify why its in the game in the first place as I don't see the need.
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2009 7:05PM ThePope said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a fucking game.

You see this kind of stuff in movies every day and no one bats a fucking eyelid it's a joke.
Reply

Posted: Oct 30th 2009 12:00AM Brodo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well if its the player choosing to shoot the civilians, than I just wont shoot them. Ill run through the airport shooting bullets at the roof
If any of my terrorist buddies lay a finger on a innocent, video generated human being I will shoot them
If I fail the object for shooting them..... then I will be in a bit of a pickle
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2009 1:37PM Dale P said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Weird, you have no problems with gunning down innocent civilians of other nationalities in a video game, but the second it's Americans on American turf it's trash?

I really don't get human beings.
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2009 3:16PM Phoenix said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, Dale, they're Russians on Russian turf.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:24PM Peter Moore said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why be content with 15 million copies sold when, with a little controversy, you can get 19+ million easily!
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 8:05PM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
exactly. i know people claim that this is about using video games as an art form, and using interactivity to advance understanding, etc., but the scene really just seems like a way to purposefully ignite controversy. i'm not offended, but the whole thing seems entirely unnecessary to me, so i'll be skipping that level/scene it if i get the game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2009 7:24AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't get me wrong, controversy will help this game more than hurt it, but I believe the reason they did this is to show you just what kind of impossible situations undercover agents are put through on a regular basis. Watch 24 if you want to see Jack Bauer have to shoot his own boss one day and almost sacrifice an innocent girl's life the next. It's powerful storytelling, and it really draws you into the narrative.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:25PM Crimsic said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Darn, the title led me to believe this was the sequel to Modern Warfare: Airport Murder Simulator


...Such a dissapointment.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:41PM VaultBoy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thought it was another article from The Onion, like the one "Shoot'em in the Face: The Video Game". I'm confident that it'll be treated properly though. God forbid we point out that terrorists MIGHT be douchebags, that wouldn't be very PC for the rest of the media. But we'll be able to count on all of them blowing it out of proportion and not checking the facts because we know most reporters dont play videogames.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:25PM The Albatross said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Obviously it simulates terrorism. Isn't that why EVERYBODY plays it!?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:59PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ballistic H: What the fucking fuck?! Let's just pile more spoilers on top of the ones I just read!
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2009 5:53AM Alex R said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yep. I suppose it's better that people would rather pretend to be terrorists in a game than be a real terrorist in a real airport.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:08PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Peter Moore let's get married
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 8:21PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
[banned]
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 9:13PM TRONdll said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Horray for irrelevance and/or reply fail.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:28PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Again with the stupid Fox News attacks. What else can you expect from idiots?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really hope I'm misreading what you're saying, and that you're not actually defending Fox News.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:42PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
You're damn right I'm defending them. They make one mistake and you guys flame them for life. How many times did the other networks rip the gaming industry to shreds with GTA and Jack Thompson? I don't see anyone ever flaming those networks.

Pardon me for liking a network that doesn't deliver The Holy Messiah's latest marching orders.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He love's Hannity tmac, he's just defending his hero. And I sympathize with him because I plan on being Hannity for halloween.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:44PM VaultBoy said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
No. He was saying that attacking them is like beating a dead horse. We know what they'll do, and we know how they operate so it shouldn't surprise anyone. Not defending unwarranted sensationalism.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"They make one mistake"

You have not watched as much Fox News as most people have evidently.

Everyone should go read Jacob Weisberg's article in the latest Newsweek (the college one) on page 19. It pinpoints exactly why Fox News is a joke of a news organization and why no one should even pay them any attention, good or bad.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Newsweek...right...

Print media is dead.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:51PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
The Libs and Obama trying to ban/marginalize Fox News are a serious threat to this country. When people are silenced for expressing their opinion, you might as well take the Constitution and put it in a shredder.

Some of you might want to rethink your position.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:54PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I don't want to be a terrorist. And I don't want to have to skip the scene. I'm out.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"When people are silenced for expressing their opinion"

That's the point, they are a NEWS organization. They get paid to report the actual news, not hire all republicans and republican talk show/radio show hosts and skew every story to the far right. I mean, Fox News was caught actually sponsoring and souping up some of those tea party protests, then covering them almost 24/7 until they ended. There's literally no way you can logically defend them.

I'm all for a cleansing of fox news and msnbc, to restructure them into actual news companies.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 6:58PM Look At This Suit said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
People don't criticize Fox News for ONE MISTAKE. They criticize Fox News because it's full of people like Bill O'Reilly who decide to make an ass of themselves on national television. It's not a liberal conspiracy at all. I consider myself a political neutral, and even I can see that Fox News is a terrible excuse for a network.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:01PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
So, when Obama sent a 'cease and desist' letter to NBC for their anti-Obama SNL skit, what was that?

Fox does report the news. They also have opinion shows, the same as MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC, who also report the 'news'.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:06PM Peter Moore said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up, you sack of stupid shit.

I'm serious, get a hammer and beat the fucking stupid out of you.

There is no fucking evidence that Obama is trying to ban Fox News, or any media organization. There's even less evidence that they're even a news channel. Just because the White House came out and talked shit about Fox, which I thought was stupid, because it doesn't really help them any, doesn't mean they're going to take them off the air. Hell, they're not even "on the air," they're on cable. The FCC has no jurisdiction on them.

And don't just bring up the Constitution, as those that supports your case. Nothing that's happening here is going against anything in there, except for maybe basic human decency on Fox's part.

I hope you enjoyed that tasty treat, you fucking troll.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But the the whole thing is a damn opinion show. Just look at their website, even their adds are far right influenced.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:08PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Peter, screw you. Please, go get your liberal blowjob now.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2009 7:09PM Will Dearborn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Oh you mean the imaginary cease and desist that you just completely made up? And you wonder why people criticise Fox News. Because of stupid lies and fear mongering like that, that makes it anything but a "news outlet."
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW