During an interview with Develop, Infinity Ward's front-line man, Robert "fourzerotwo" Bowling, recalled the early planning stages of Modern Warfare 2. Unsurprisingly, publisher and owner Activision was eager to pour money into the development of the COD4 sequel, following the basic business formula: more money = better product = more sales = more money. Infinity Ward followed another school of thought: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
"Much like we don't let ourselves get distracted by hype, if you have excess you feel like you should use excess," Bowling said. Even though Activision "estimated out a ridiculous budget" early on, Infinity Ward "didn't let the budget affect [its] mentality." Since Infinity Ward apparently didn't take the money (or, at least, all of it), we do have a pretty good idea of what Activision spent it on: night-vision goggles for everyone!
Reader Comments (66)
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:32PM (Unverified) said
Can i say it?
ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:33PM (Unverified) said
I respectfully disagree. They should have taken the budget and deliver us a game on a new engine that didn't look like last gen and lasted a decent length. I am proud to say that i will be one of many who will not purchase this crap day one. There will be plenty in the used bins shortly after release, since the single player is only 4-6 hours probably.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:35PM (Unverified) said
Haven't you done enough trolling already?
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11/03/gamestop-ps3-sales-remain-very-strong-post-price-cut/comments/22807675/
Don't bring this shit into MY territory, mother fucker.
Reply
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11/03/gamestop-ps3-sales-remain-very-strong-post-price-cut/comments/22807675/
Don't bring this shit into MY territory, mother fucker.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:38PM Special Agent Steve said
Hey Kotick, how many times was your house egged this Halloween? More than usual? YEAH, THIS IS WHY! Fucker.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:42PM (Unverified) said
Because we're funding for the sequel of one of the most successful FPSs of 2007?
Makes sense to me.
Reply
Makes sense to me.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:43PM Special Agent Steve said
Yeah, I know. But you still ruined the PC game.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:44PM (Unverified) said
Would you like a knife and fork for those words?
And Ulquiorra Cifer, it doesn't count if you just crawl into a cave after its release date with only your thoughts to vote up your crazed theories.
Reply
And Ulquiorra Cifer, it doesn't count if you just crawl into a cave after its release date with only your thoughts to vote up your crazed theories.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:45PM RunnyRiver said
He has a small point. Anyone in government work knows if you don't spend it this year, you won't get it next year.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:46PM (Unverified) said
I ruined it...
Take that up with the developers, Aspyr, not me.
Reply
Take that up with the developers, Aspyr, not me.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:46PM (Unverified) said
It took me nearly nine hours to complete Modern Warfare's single player on normal difficulty. Even though that is a little short, it was action packed and one of the best games I've ever played. You need to quit your trolling.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:00PM (Unverified) said
Right, because I totally wouldn't charge full price for both...
You can all thank RKN for giving me ideas!
Reply
You can all thank RKN for giving me ideas!
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:10PM aughscreennames said
They should have used as much money as they could. You dont have to add crap for the sake of spending money. More money means they can afford better things for what they currently have, like the best voice actors in the business if they wanted.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:43PM phinn said
With the sales they had an the budget of the first one MW2 should have the biggest baddest single player ever, along with a ton of awesome multiplayer maps, lag free gaming, much better sound effects from the original (they were terrible compared to games like Bad Company and Socom), and just be all around amazing. In addition to this I would expect some free DLC (like Bad Company and Socom have done) sort of as a thank you to all their fans buying their new game, and to ackowledge they are making millions upon millions off it.
Alas none of that will happen, and I will most likely not better getting this. I will keep enjoying amazing games like Demon's Souls, and Uncharted 2 until Bad Company 2 or MAG is released.
Reply
Alas none of that will happen, and I will most likely not better getting this. I will keep enjoying amazing games like Demon's Souls, and Uncharted 2 until Bad Company 2 or MAG is released.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 9:06PM (Unverified) said
@dude with weird name whos a fanboy
yes 360 all the way
no to changing modern warfare 2
Reply
yes 360 all the way
no to changing modern warfare 2
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 9:14PM Sly C said
@phinnvr
i dunno, the single player looks pretty epic so far, and all the multiplayer maps look good. and all the spec ops missions i've heard of so far all sound really good. i'd save my judgment for after release if i were you.
but yeah, free DLC would be much appreciated, but will never happen because kotick's a douche.
Reply
i dunno, the single player looks pretty epic so far, and all the multiplayer maps look good. and all the spec ops missions i've heard of so far all sound really good. i'd save my judgment for after release if i were you.
but yeah, free DLC would be much appreciated, but will never happen because kotick's a douche.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 9:48PM (Unverified) said
@ phinnvr6
The terms "bigger" and "baddest" bring back awful memories of Gears of War 2. Let's hope MW2 doesn't go that route.
Reply
The terms "bigger" and "baddest" bring back awful memories of Gears of War 2. Let's hope MW2 doesn't go that route.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 10:01PM (Unverified) said
@Eh
You mean they could have gotten celebrities to do voice overs? They probably decided to get unknowns to do the voice-overs because unknowns really want to do as good of a job as they can and might do a better job. And they don't need celebrities for this game. I'm glad they got unknowns. I would rather have that than celebrities.
Reply
You mean they could have gotten celebrities to do voice overs? They probably decided to get unknowns to do the voice-overs because unknowns really want to do as good of a job as they can and might do a better job. And they don't need celebrities for this game. I'm glad they got unknowns. I would rather have that than celebrities.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 10:31PM (Unverified) said
@phinnvr6
So you played the game... No you didn't so shut up.
Reply
So you played the game... No you didn't so shut up.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:04PM (Unverified) said
Dude...
CoD4:Modern Warfare release in 07' I think.
To this day.
Im fraggin people in 30 seconds from game startup to Search & Destroy.
Its crazy easy to find a game.
Unless you dont have an internet connection (which is very few people in this modern age)
I wouldnt expect someone to trade it in.
Reply
CoD4:Modern Warfare release in 07' I think.
To this day.
Im fraggin people in 30 seconds from game startup to Search & Destroy.
Its crazy easy to find a game.
Unless you dont have an internet connection (which is very few people in this modern age)
I wouldnt expect someone to trade it in.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:33PM (Unverified) said
You gotta admit, those night-vision goggles are pretty sweet.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:33PM CheeziePotato said
IW, you should have used some of that money for dedicated servers.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:36PM Special Agent Steve said
Money was spent to disable party chat. And no amount of money would allow Activision to stop being greedy and give us dedicated servers.. wait, I guess there is.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:39PM (Unverified) said
Lets look at this realistically. Do you really think they will cave in to demands when this whole time they didn't? You really think they created IW.net just to scrape it when the backlash? The best thing people can do is simply not buy the game if they do not feel the need, for whatever reason it may be.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:43PM CheeziePotato said
IW and Activision isn't going to listen to anyone. They already know their game is going to sell extremely well.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6238659.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;1
Reply
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6238659.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;1
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:32PM (Unverified) said
It actually cost more money to take away dedicated servers. They had to develop IW.NET and now they have to pay for their own servers. They already had a dedicated server browser (although one that wasn't very good). All they had to do was copy and paste and everyone would be happy. They could have even used the Steam server browser.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:35PM Uncle Jesse said
I'm pretty sure they'd be safe to spend whatever amount they wanted... this ain't Waterworld we're talking about.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:45PM Bubbameister33 said
Dry land? A mailman giving hope to people in a post apocalyptic future? Kevin Costner playing Robin Hood without an English accent?
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:36PM (Unverified) said
Well, the lower the budget means that they will simply make more profit since the game will sell a gazillion copies either way. It is nice to see a developer who isn't complaining about how games cost too much to make and working within a budget. Of course, that is if he is telling the truth about the matter.
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:39PM Premature ejaculation man said
Unless I'm mistaken, isn't this story saying how MW2 had a ridiculously large budget rather than a small one?
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:40PM (Unverified) said
"Since Infinity Ward apparently didn't take the money (or, at least, all of it)"
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:37PM (Unverified) said
Activision's not worried. Whatever was spent, times it by a bazillion dollars.
I think Soap Mctavish's face is on the bazillion dollar bill.
Reply
I think Soap Mctavish's face is on the bazillion dollar bill.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:43PM (Unverified) said
Oh... so how do they explain the fact that MW2 cost £45 to buy compared to the usual price of £35 - £40 for all other games? The excuse at the time was that games development costs had gone up so the MW2 would be a test case to see if they could charge a higher price for the more expensive to develop games:
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/35050/5499-Modern-Warfare-2-to-lead-Xmas-price-hike
Oh, what's that sound I hear? It's the sound of the other foot dropping...
Reply
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/35050/5499-Modern-Warfare-2-to-lead-Xmas-price-hike
Oh, what's that sound I hear? It's the sound of the other foot dropping...
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:50PM Special Agent Steve said
Wow, that's ridiculous. 55 euros is 90$. That's just stupid. I haven't heard of a single game this year releasing
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:52PM (Unverified) said
http://www.play.com/Games/PC/4-/10109313/Call-Of-Duty-Modern-Warfare-2/Product.html
£34.99 plus free shipping
I'm getting this game in Canada for $49.99, from a sale.
Reply
£34.99 plus free shipping
I'm getting this game in Canada for $49.99, from a sale.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:30PM (Unverified) said
BTW I was referring to the console versions:
http://www.play.com/Search.aspx?searchtype=allproducts&searchstring=modern+warfare+2&page=search&pa=search&go.x=32&go.y=8
The PC version may be £34.99 but it is still £5 more than other games.
Reply
http://www.play.com/Search.aspx?searchtype=allproducts&searchstring=modern+warfare+2&page=search&pa=search&go.x=32&go.y=8
The PC version may be £34.99 but it is still £5 more than other games.
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:46PM Marco le Polo said
Anyone still planning on "Playing the game, AND checking out the cheerleading camp at night?" -Obie
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:53PM TheDarkWayne said
Cheerleading camp? In November? Where the hell do you live?
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 7:59PM Special Agent Steve said
A very frosty town. With hard ni- [banned]
Reply
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 8:10PM Marco le Polo said
I was thinking, Dark Wayne, that someone would've put something more along the lines of...
"Cheerleading camp? In November? At night? Where the hell do you live because I want to go!"
Steve, I wish :( @ the almost completed second sentence.
Reply
"Cheerleading camp? In November? At night? Where the hell do you live because I want to go!"
Steve, I wish :( @ the almost completed second sentence.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 116 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments











