| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (20)

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This sounds similar to the way it worked in Knights of the Old Republic II. Revan's path and decisions from the first game were established early, based on a few conversations with other NPC's.
Reply

Posted: Nov 7th 2009 3:18AM imadogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's the first and only thing I thought of.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:15PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So what if we played through more than once to get multiple endings? Schizophrenic splicers?
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:23PM Neebs said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't think you read the article. There is no save game import, the dialogue is just written with ambiguity. (i.e.., "I don't like what he did at X.")
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 9:03PM Elette said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Asif they weren't that already.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm confused as hell!

I thought Bioshock 2 was supposed to be a prequel, which takes place before the events of BS1. If that is the case, then no wonder Rapture collapsed on itself. The splicers were caught in some type of wicked Star Trek time/space warp that caused the underwater civilization to implode on itself arguing over the actions of a protagonist that didn't even exist yet.

That, or they ended up making BS2 a true sequel that takes place after BS1.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:44PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I thought that as well. I was fairly certain that Bioshock 2 was a prequel.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:48PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Bioshock 2 is actually set 10 years after Bioshock.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:55PM cjshrader said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Originally, all the rumors did state it was going to be a prequel.

It was some time ago though that it was announced it was a sequel. I think it's better this way, there are not a lot of mysteries about Rapture's past we don't already know. Its future is still up in the air though.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 6:23PM ccindyderek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The campain is a sequel, set around 10 years after Bioshock 1. The multiplayer however takes place before Bioshock 1, during the main fall of Rapture.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2009 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm confused too. How can this be a sequel??? They said the main character of Bioshock 2 is the original big daddy, which is long before Bioshock 1.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 4:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AMBIGUITY? They discuss "any" of the paths we could've taken? Isn't that a bit silly?
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:48PM TJF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You misunderstand. Read Mr.ESC's post above.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm building me a house out of meat and calling it Bioshack.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 5:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess that makes sense. But how much talking will there be about the actions of your first character 10 years later?
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 6:49PM KeenCommander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also known as the Invisible War approach. Which, in case anyone forgot, FAILED miserably. Even if the game was still decent.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 9:17PM comradetrotskii said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure the only choice made in Bioshock was whether you harvested or did not harvest the little sisters (or harvested some), everything else was scripted.

How do you introduce ambiguity into that? It's black and white. Either you killed (some or all) or you did not kill any. So are they talking about the scripted events only and how the splicers perceived them? That is not very interesting at all. Certainly not interesting enough to speak about it with MTV.
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Amen to that. I am so sick of people acting like BioShock had a plethora of RPG-like moral decisions to make. It had exactly one, and it had almost no effect on gameplay.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2009 9:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, they argue about what (factually) happened, as opposed to if that outcome was good/bad?
Reply

Posted: Nov 7th 2009 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IIRC, original speculation was that B2 was going to be a prequel.
But they debunked that and 2 was a sequel while 3 may be a prequel.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW