Star Trek Online officially beams into retail on February 2, 2010, keeping in line with what an unearthed Atari financial document expected last May. Players will boldly enter 2409 and continue "the story of the latest film installment," according to the press release. Huh, and here we thought it took place after the poorly-received Nemesis and not the "latest" Star Trek movie, which was actually the acclaimed reboot.
We contacted Atari to find out which layer of the sci-fi series' multiverse we'll be playing in and a representative apologized for the confusion, saying , "Events in the movie that happened in the prime timeline -- the destruction of Romulus, and the disappearance of Spock and Nero -- have affected STO. You can learn more about the aftermath of these events in the Path to 2409 and in STO itself."
Reader Comments (31)
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:11PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said
Thanks for the [fucking retarded and completely fucking incorrect] comment.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 5:57PM Commander Corn said
Hell yeah! Downvote him for giving his opinion!
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 6:40PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said
Someone should make a FPSMMOJRPGRTSBBQ game.
And they should call it...Huxley. It will suck. Royally.
Reply
And they should call it...Huxley. It will suck. Royally.
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:06PM (Unverified) said
See, I'm a big Star Trek fan. But if they really wanted my money, they'd let me be Kirk. I don't want to be some pansy Klingon!
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 5:02PM The Blank Mage Returns said
You'd need a gameplay mechanic centered around his oddly timed speaking pattern, though. That's something I want to try.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:13PM Freddie Mercury said
umm...Alex? Did you actually figure out the stardate? Or did you just pull a number out of your ass?
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:14PM (Unverified) said
The correct star date for the release is: -313087.69
/nerd
Thanks.
Reply
/nerd
Thanks.
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:16PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said
I bet you're a stud with the ladies.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:41PM (Unverified) said
The destruction of Romulus? Don't you mean Vulcan?
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 4:48PM NekoDaimyo said
Prime timeline. The one Spock went back in time from. Vulcan is still in one piece there, while Romulus got popped by the super nova.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 7:12PM LaughingTarget said
It wouldn't be Star Trek without the confusing time travel.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 5:04PM The Blank Mage Returns said
I get the feeling all ships in the series will be playable, but that's not based on actual evidence.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 7:23PM dr steve brule said
not sure about the romulan warbird, but defintely birds of prey. we will see, if not surely dlc will come out for it one day.
at any rate, definitely going to get this game.
Reply
at any rate, definitely going to get this game.
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 7:24PM RogueEnterprise said
AFAIK, the launch factions are the Federation (Starfleet) and Klingons (Klingon Defense Forces). Other ships you might be able to fly on a mission by mission basis (ie, hijack a Romulan ship and use it to attack such and such)
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 6:44PM dogmaticatheist said
I might try this game. I will immediately /quit if I get a stupid fetch quest.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 8:00PM (Unverified) said
They should have it were you only play one guy and it takes a whole crew to fly a ship. And levels 1-30 you can only run around the hallways during a red alert and try not to be killed by explosions, blow in space or assimilated.
Reply
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 9:01PM Ignatius said
Oh yeah, that'd be fun, floating dead in space because your helmsman decided to doze off at the keyboard.
And your tactical officer decided to take a sick day. And the first officer is at work.
While a cool idea in concept, the multi-faceted lives of people make that impossible.
Reply
And your tactical officer decided to take a sick day. And the first officer is at work.
While a cool idea in concept, the multi-faceted lives of people make that impossible.
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 10:44PM (Unverified) said
They're not in beta yet, and they're shipping Feb. 2?
Yikes.
Reply
Yikes.
Posted: Nov 10th 2009 12:34AM saintstryfe said
No Mac version, no sale.
Sad, I'd love to give this a try while waiting for Cataclysm.
Reply
Sad, I'd love to give this a try while waiting for Cataclysm.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 116 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments











