We already knew the announced cuts coming to EA's workforce (totaling some 1,500 jobs lost) would be deep but, if a recent Kotaku report is to be believed, we're starting to get an idea of just where the gashes will come. For starters, the site says it's been told by unnamed sources that almost every member of the Command and Conquer 4 team would be let go after the game's completion, which is the very last Halo Wars feature we wanted to see copied in C&C.
More cuts are rumored to be hitting Pandemic (the house behind Mercenaries and The Saboteur) and Maxis (yeah, again). We'll keep reaching out to EA to get the official story. In the meantime, our thoughts are with those affected.
Reader Comments (20)
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:03AM (Unverified) said
Wow, I guess EA wants to go back to the days where I just really don't give a shit about their games and never buy them... Enjoy your madden guys!
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 9:53AM ll features ll said
Why don't publishers just sell off their assets these days, surely that would be the more profitable avenue rather than just shutting shop?
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 10:20AM Lord Malvern said
My guess is that they are firing all their veteran developers to pave the way for new developers with less experience that they can pay less. A very short term strategy I'd say.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 10:30AM (Unverified) said
I feel horrible for those employees getting cut, but what I just don't understand is why anyone voluntarily works for EA to begin with. (Well, maybe in this job market, but under normal conditions - I just don't get it).
Yes, they make AAA titles which looks good on a resume, but the between the (reforming) sweatshop mentality and soulless sequel rehashes they put out, the work cannot be rewarding. It seems like every time they do these big cuts it is to their more creative divisions.
Their working conditions are infamous going all the way back to EA_spouse of 2004, and an article on Kotaku pointed out that this purge cycle happens every year right after crunch time for the Christmas release (almost as if they don't like paying for the recovery time between projects).
Reply
Yes, they make AAA titles which looks good on a resume, but the between the (reforming) sweatshop mentality and soulless sequel rehashes they put out, the work cannot be rewarding. It seems like every time they do these big cuts it is to their more creative divisions.
Their working conditions are infamous going all the way back to EA_spouse of 2004, and an article on Kotaku pointed out that this purge cycle happens every year right after crunch time for the Christmas release (almost as if they don't like paying for the recovery time between projects).
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said
Interestingly enough, the infamous EA spouse LiveJournal entry was posted exactly five years ago, today.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:33AM (Unverified) said
Does no one buy RTS games any more? First Halo wars, now C&C. And sad about Pandemic, they were good developers. I am afraid that we will end up with a few mega-titles, GTA, CoD, churning the same stuff again and again, and other developers withering away. mercenaries sold 2m but even that wasnt enough it seems. And difficult though it may seem, bioware is at risk too - Mass Effect sold just 2-2.5m, and would have cost 40-50m to develop for such a massive complex game, which means they would have lost money even after PC sales.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 12:53PM Noodles In Soup said
Halo Wars sold over a million copies in the US alone, and considering that it was a console only (and mediocre at best) RTS the sales were quite astonishing. It will be a huge slap in the face to these developers if C&C 4 sells well, just like it was to Ensemble.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:43AM (Unverified) said
Aside from the fact that we will be losing a bunch of great titles, my concern about this move is that EA is at risk of becoming short sighted. Without supporting new IP's, I feel that they risk becoming insignificant in the industry over time.
How long can you run a company off of sequels? Doesn't anyone else see this?
Reply
How long can you run a company off of sequels? Doesn't anyone else see this?
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:47AM JoshMilewski said
I've never really played that series before, but that screenshot looks fun.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:48AM (Unverified) said
RTS games need an HD Wii bad. Pointing and Clicking is only good in HD
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 11:57AM AwesomeTown said
I must be getting old. I still feel Maxis and Westwood are big players in PC gaming.
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2009 1:46PM Lobster Mobster said
Hmm.. And how many executives are losing their jobs? What? None? They're getting bonuses? Yep, that sounds about right.
Reply
Posted: Nov 12th 2009 2:18AM (Unverified) said
And the sad thing is they'll want to hire new people that have loads of experience for low pay. Then, there's people like me who wouldn't mind getting paid lower if we could just get a good dev job (I'm an artist) to start off with even if we didn't have any experience yet. Right now I'm working at a game company, but I'm not directly involved in the development b/c I don't have enough experience.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 152 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









