| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (183)

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:05AM premiumdude said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm holding out for Super Bible Navigator X HD Turbo Remix:EXTREME!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 6:46AM AntiVillian said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh man lets get some Quran Navigator X and some Tanakh Navigator X up in this bitch too, shits so cash.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 6:57AM Deaths Hand said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
DUDE!!!...eronomy
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 10:28AM NathanDTS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one that can see that all these guys need to do to make more money is delete the New Testament and they have the Torah?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 10:48AM MGTrey said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I heard you can First Testament Cancel into a Parting of the Red Sea Super, with only half meter.

Broken, I tell you.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 10:54AM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Trey

That comment delighted me in every single possible way! Ha ha ha!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 11:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So wait can I choose to play as the Romans? Wait it's not a game.. man!

I guess a game running around with lumber, nails and hammer would get kind of old after a while anyways.

Yes I know I'm going to hell, but I have a feeling I will have lots of company :)
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 11:32AM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This thing is such a great idea. Do you know how much money you can make on a bible!? They shoulda probably waited till like christmas or easter release it though.


Anyways if you want a free game made using XNA, I just released Slaam! Mobile:

http://www.zuneboards.com/forums/download-completed-games/46647-slaam-mobile-fin.html

Lots of fun + Free!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 1:26PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait to see what they do for DLC.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 1:41PM decapitor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
dead sea scrolls DLC?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 2:29PM MPTownes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Captain, I hate to correct you, but I'm pretty sure Jesus isn't going to condone the Sin of Onan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 2:48PM Martin C said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*clicks Wikipedia link*

*faps*
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The story about Onan isn't about how you shouldn't whack off, it's about being obedient to God and doing what you're told. Reading comprehension goes a long way. Don't worry though, taking things literally is cool, too, if you're a crazy catholic.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:34AM MPTownes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude, I was raised Catholic. I can assure you that I was never required to read the Bible in any depth. That's what we have priests, bishops, monsigniors, cardinals, nuns, and the pope for. To tell us all how to think and what the correct interpretation is.

And I'm pretty sure Jesus doesn't give a shit if I whack it or not.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:09AM Ringot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Excellent news. Now someone make me a "On the origin of species: Navigator X".

Creation wars begun, they have.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 8:42AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
If Sony is against religion and its nutcase followers I suppose that I'm and now declaring myself an official Sony Pony.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 8:51AM The Nth Doctor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The man with the atrocious grammar and incredibly random spelling is telling *us* to educate ourselves.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 7:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why can't joystiq just delete the entire post thread instead of throwing the replies of the deleted post INTO someone else's post. UGH
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Their press release is wrong. There was a version of the King James Version made for Game Boy back in the 90s.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
maybe this game will have a "cult following"
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
bucket-a-fish
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 8:35AM acefondu said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gold. I lol'ed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 9:22AM anoffday said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm a Christian and I lol'ed a little bit. I won't lie.

But seriously, we're not all crazy. The media just picks out the crazy ones to show you guys.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 9:55AM ThePope said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are sane people who believe in a magical man who sits on clouds and sees everything you do?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 10:51AM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are sane people that think that the Universe blew up and expanded so much that's it's now contracting and that people used to be fish?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 12:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the difference in believing in God up in the clouds etc. and believing that humans used to be fish is simply that there is no proof about the God stuff and there is a lot of proof about the fish thing.

Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 1:13PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ashitaka

I wish they would. They certainly aren't helping themselves by fucking each other and having kids and just generally being Evolution's little bitch.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 1:49PM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Sorry guys, but you're wrong. If there was proof then evolution wouldn't still be filed under "theory". Talk to me when you find actual facts and proof that support the idea of one species evolving into a completely different species. Because as of yet there isn't any. At all. Period.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 2:00PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry retard, but you're wrong. EVOLUTION HAS BEEN PROVED. However, the ways by which living organisms evolve still haven't been proven. There are many theories regarding how evolution works and that's where the scientific community is divided - some support some theories while others support, well, others.

If you had gone to school you would know this. I pity people like you... Honestly...
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gravity is also "just a theory".

If breeders can artificially select and implement new traits to create new breeds of creatures over the span of just a few decades, why can't nature do the same to a greater degree over a few billion years and a few billion billion life-cycles?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 3:31PM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Ashitaka,
If you can't prove someone wrong, make baseless blanket statements and call them names. Maybe you should take a debate class. If you're defining "evolution" as "organisms adapting to their environment", then I guess you're right. But no one is arguing that. No one. Please try to keep up.

Phylogenetics,
Sure, you can make a different breed of dog from different dogs, but you can't make a different species of alligator from different dogs, can you?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 4:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd like to take this moment to apologise to everyone: I'm really sorry to have had an evolution debate on a games site. This is neither the time nor place to get all debatey. Shame on me.

It won't happen again.

WRE, if you have a Y!A account, we can take this outside. Send me a message.
http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=AsdILfKs0dPKvNp5uRGeQ0_sy6IX;_ylv=3?show=MSEyXHFWaa&preview=true
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 4:37PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. Sorry, but I'm not calling you names. Anyone who doesn't believe in evolution is, by definition, a retard.

2. This is what a baseless blanket statement is: "If there was proof then evolution wouldn't still be filed under "theory"." Evolution is a fact. The means by which living organisms evolve are the only things that haven't been -fully- proven.

3. I never defined evolution as "organisms adapting to their environment", read what I wrote again. Simply put, evolution is based on the following PROVEN FACTS:

A. The Earth is 4.5 billion years old. This is such a big concept that neither you nor I can totally grasp it, but it's a fact. Of course, since you believe that the Earth is 5000 years old and flat, you won't understand the following facts.

B. All living things show variation. Every population which has been studied shows that animal and plants vary as much as humans do.

C. Natural selection takes place, and the populations with the most advantageous traits are the ones that manage to survive.

D. Variation comes from genes, and genetic variation is increased by gene mutations. You know that DNA stuff, right? Guess not.

E. Much of this variation can be inherited. The parents pass such traits to the children through their genes. Right? Right??!

F. The next generation can only come from those that survive and reproduce. After many generations of this, the population will have more helpful genetic differences, and fewer harmful ones. Natural selection is really a process of elimination. The elimination is being caused by the relative fit between the individuals, and the environment they live in.

Through the course of billions of years... You've got Evolution. And so, we humans evolved from apes or from a common ancestor. Well, at least some of us evolved.

4. I doubt you'll answer this... But how old are you? I seriously expect you to tell that you're forty... or fifty. Because if you are in your twenties then damn, you should be ashamed, you didn't pay much attention in school now did you? :/
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:06PM Slaziman said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
As far as I know, although microevolution has been proven ("adapting to the environment"), the evolution of complex things like eyes (macroevolution) isn't proven, but there is a lot of supporting evidence, just not conclusive evidence. Didn't really research this, but that's what I last heard.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:35PM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Wow, ashitaka, you sure can write a lot without saying anything. Not sure why you're such a belligerent asshole, I don't disagree with anything you've said or implied except for the second paragraph of part F. By the way, I'm 27, but that doesn't mean I'm a close-minded narcissist. And you can say that I didn't pay attention in school, but my GPA says otherwise. So let me ask you a question. According to your part F, homosexuality is a harmful trait, right?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 6:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm not saying creationism is correct or that evolution theory is wrong, but the people who claim that human evolution is a proven fact make me lololol. And I'm not saying that because it's "just a theory." There is actually a shockingly small pool of data that suggests humans evolved from primates, and none if it can even be considered relatively definitive. The reason that most people believe it to be the "correct" theory is not because there's enough proof to back it up, but rather because there is an even bigger lack of proof in the other direction. Essentially, anybody who believe they have evidence either way needs to be cock slapped right in the face.

@ Phylogenetics: Yes, gravity is also "just a theory." The funny part is that you meant that sarcastically, but in reality gravity is constantly being redefined and what we thing we know about it turns out to be wrong. So yes, evolution is a lot like gravity actually. Good show.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 7:28PM Ashitaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ wre

I can write a lot without saying anything? I explained you evolution in the simplest way I could and in the way it's taught at schools in my country when we're in the first year of high school. I sure was something.

If you agree with all of them then aren't you supporting evolution? Omfg...

Ok, presuming that homosexuality isn't a choice (please, I don't want to start this debate, I know nothing about the subject --') and that it is somehow related to our genes which in turn are related to our hormones... Then yeah, I'd say that that is a harmful trait. Since homosexuals have no way to reproduce (humanly speaking, of course, I'm pretty sure there are some freaky organisms out there that have weird ways of reproducing) then they won't pass their genes to the next generation.



@ Matthew Perry

If evolution is a fact, then we, as simple mammals, are part of it. Probably there isn't sufficient proof that we evolved FROM APES but there sure is hard evidence that we are relatives and that we had a common ancestor a long, long time ago. Genetically speaking, we're pretty much the same. Whoever denies it is the one who needs to be cock slapped right in the face.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 12:15AM maveric101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
people, just fyi, the Pope, and therefore the whole Catholic Church, has officially acknowledged evolution multiple times. Catholics, and most Christians, are not backward, so-called "creationists."
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ Ashitaka:

I actually agree with you on this debate. Evolution is obviously a real phenomena that includes humans. However, it's pants-shittingly obvious that you actually don't know anything about it, so for your sake you should probably just leave.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 9:21AM ThePope said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wow, I didn't realise people with this level of stupid even existed. Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it wrong.

I'm not sure if they're trolls or idiots, I'm just hoping for the good of humanity it's the former.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
all this for a joke I made...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:31PM Ashitaka said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ Matthew Perry
I know nothing about evolution? Much more than you do, for sure lol. fu, stfu & gtfo

@ Wre
I see your point. Or I would, if you hadn't shit your pants. Way to go, Creationist.

@ Owl
Sorry for filling your mail box, you just had an awesome first post! :P
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
look behind his legs, thats a launch party faceplate from the invite only event...who the hell invited that guy?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:27AM shattercross said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm a Ps3 fan and all but that was just mean-spirited.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:28AM shamon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
HO HO HO!

When we use "teaching" as a euphemism for "indoctrination".

HO HO HO!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:42AM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Damn the Reapers!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 9:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think you meant; mmm mmm mmm
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I banish you!
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2009 5:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This would please my dad.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW