| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (44)

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:33AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was originally intended to be a Zerg unit that was supposed to be their answer to the Thor and the Mothership. However when they scaled back the game, they saw no use for the unit in the Zerg multiplayer game.

However, they kept it for the Single Player.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:35AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, i'm thinking of the Omegalisk, but that thing is pretty brutal too.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 9:10AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So then what exactly IS supposed to be the Zerg equivalent of the mothership in multiplayer?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 12:21PM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, since the Zerg are a much smaller race (in regards to technological prowess) and more of a carpetting race, they don't have an "equivalent" unit. However, they have plenty of units that can easily fight a mothership; Mutalisks, Scourge, Hydralisks.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:03PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doesn't matter if it's in or out for multi, I'm still a zerg player through and through. (and not rushing, that's just lame)
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:33AM The Artist Formerly known as Jes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I see your Yamato Cannon and raise you a Nuclear Launch
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 8:48AM tcc3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Nuclear Launch Detected"
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:17PM pekosROB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
unless the "Brutalisk" can also see your hidden guy directing where the bomb goes...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:05PM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see your nuclear launch and raise to one Dark Archon mind control mwuhahaha!

Aside: I am aware they aren't Terran units, but hey, a guy can dream
Reply

Posted: Nov 26th 2009 10:50PM Demon G Sides said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can Mind Control zerg units...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:34AM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Holy God.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:39AM TypeF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HOLY SHIT!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 11:30AM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
gods shit is holy!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:35AM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
We Require More Vespene Gas!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nuclear Launch Detected.

Seriously, though...I'm still a little shocked that the game is actually releasing next year.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAhAHAHA no.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What, you're not shocked?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:07AM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's launching next year, sure, but you'll be paying the same price for 1/3 of the game, and possibly have to pay for online! And it doesn't have lan support!

I'm getting less and less excited for this game every time it's mentioned.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:23AM Zeratul said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I think kn1ves was just expressing his confidence(or lack thereof) that it will actually make it out next year.

And if 1/3 of the game is as big as the entire original was, then I see no reason not to pay a similar price. If they'd given a third of all three campaigns in this first one, and then released two more expansion packs over the next couple years, you'd be getting the same value, but there's be a lot less whining.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:38AM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's really the wrong way to market the game, they announced it as a single game, and now it's 3 separate games. A lot like Bungies fumble of saying ODST was likely to cost $30, and then later saying no no, it's worth $60. Most people will still buy it, sure, but I don't go for that shit. If they actually charge less for it then I might actually pick it up, but no way I'm paying $150 for starcraft 2, regardless of how long it is or how long I've waited for it. If that is how the pricing ends up, I'll probably end up getting it when it's all in a $20 battle chest five years later.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:50AM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bet if Blizzard never announced the expansions, the complaining would be minimal. This is no different from ANY expansion of any PC game series, especially not Blizzard games. I'm perfectly willing to get a full-length single-player campaign and the complete multiplayer experience with just one game purchase, and then pay for an updated game with a new single-player game and additional content. I would prefer the 2nd and 3rd expansions cost less, but that's yet to be seen.

And, no, Battle.net shows absolutely no signs of requiring a subscription fee, as they've already denied that the core multiplayer experience will require additional fees. So far, the only "monetizing" of Battle.net comes in the form of premium user-created content that can be sold by players, alongside the option to make things free if the creator wishes (there is probably more to it, but that's all the details I know of so far). Considering that Starcraft 2's editor is so powerful that it can allow for genre-changing "maps" for the game, I wouldn't put it past them to charge for it.

Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:47AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn three part campaign in separate boxes.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Only from Activision.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:04AM Demon G Sides said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No. 3 campaigns that are the size of all the previous Blizzard RTS campaigns together, each.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:51AM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Expansions, completely new to PC gaming.

Blizzard innovates!

Wait...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 1:54AM moo083 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd say a whole battalion of siege tanks in siege mode would do the trick. Those guys put out a lot of damage.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:04AM Lukeyo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Brutal.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 10:09AM Dismissile said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
isk
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:17AM Exar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All for the Swarm!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:22AM Zeratul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No way that thing would hold up against a dozen carriers. I know this is terran campaign so that's not an option, but it'd still be my gut instinct.

Actually, that things probably tall enough to take anti-air hits. Goliaths and Wraiths, with some Siege-mode backup.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:34AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think Goliaths are in Starcraft 2 :(
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:37AM Zeratul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Carriers haven't been announced yet either I don't think, But I'm still going to hold faith for the time being.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 2:53AM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Carriers have definitely been announced. It's a listed unit on the official website. They had another unit to replace them, but opted to just keep the original Carrier unit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:23AM Zeratul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, awesome then. Their site updates so rarely/sporadically nowadays I didn't even notice. Thanks!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:10AM Apollo26 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
EN TARO ADUN!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:16AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EN TARO TASSADAR!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 7:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is not Warcraft in space!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 10:08AM redjack said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Nope, just games workshop in space. The Zerg are the Tyranids with slight Chaos leanings, the Protoss are the Eldar with maybe a little Tau Empire mixed in and the Terrans are the Space Marines.
They need to lift the Chaos Marines and Daemon powers in some way next. Or I guess something along the lines of Necrons would be good as that's just an ancient power we accidentally unleashed on ourselves.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 3:32AM Zeratul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree that it's terrible marketing on their part, but I know a shitstorm would've arisen if they'd only announced one game, and it only had the terran campaign. Or if the campaign were 10 hours between three races, and started some epic stuff, and left it at a cliffhanger because they didn't have enough time to do much of it.

Basically, I don't think there was any good solution. I'm not telling people to accept it or like it, but at least humor the idea that it's not just a money grab on blizzard's part.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 4:13AM Giroro said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So it's a unit that can't be used until I rebuy the game in 2011 for the zerg campaign?

THANKS ACTIBLIZZARD!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 5:13AM Zeratul said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, the way they worded it, it's a unit you just don't get to use. Maybe in a zerg campaign level, but not in multiplayer at all, even if you buy the zerg edition.

Think of it like the Kerrigan unit, couldn't use that in multiplayer either.

And on the same lines, I'm sure you could make UseMapSettings maps where you can use that brutalisk to your heart's content.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 4:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How many fucking overlords do you need to spawn for that thing!?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2009 6:29AM JeezWhiz87 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Over 9,000.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW