Or, if you're not really a traditionalist, you can opt for the giant, spiked wheel of death. Your choice. See the video after the break.
Or, if you're not really a traditionalist, you can opt for the giant, spiked wheel of death. Your choice. See the video after the break.
Reader Comments (38)
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:13PM (Unverified) said
I know see the similarities between Bayonetta and Sarah Palin, both are lame and refuse to go away
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:29PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
can only get so creative without smashing a head in the ground with a titty.....now when a game does that....I'll say THATS a creative death...
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:33PM Troy Powers said
Smashing a head in the ground with a titty.
I really have no worthwhile comment to add to that. I just felt compelled to repeat it.
Smashing a head in the ground with a titty.
Reply
I really have no worthwhile comment to add to that. I just felt compelled to repeat it.
Smashing a head in the ground with a titty.
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:02PM BananaBoat said
With a titty...with a titty.....
Death by motorboat, every mans dream.
Reply
Death by motorboat, every mans dream.
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:05PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
I've been slapped around with 2 sets of titties at the same time before(48DD & 46EEE) that was a CRAZY Experience....
Reply
Posted: Nov 19th 2009 2:41PM Troy Powers said
Damn, how could you people downvote two huge sets of breasts? Are your hearts made of stone?
Reply
Posted: Nov 19th 2009 5:18PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
they must think I'm lyin.....but its the truth...most of the women I know are big breasted....
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:30PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
Bayonetta is dead to me. Maybe if they didn't half ass the PS3 port I'd actually give a damn but at this point I'd be lying if I said this game actually meant something to me. I'd rather them just make it a 360 exclusive than release a substandard game on the PS3. Maybe if Sega / Platinum understood their audience (primarily on the PS3) they would have delayed the game and made improvements.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:46PM (Unverified) said
Delaying it would mean spending more money when the game is pretty much finished.
Sega's thinking "we'll make a shitty port , and if they're really bothered by it we can just make a patch later".
Reply
Sega's thinking "we'll make a shitty port , and if they're really bothered by it we can just make a patch later".
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 6:49PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
I also have a Wii and I used to have a 360. It's not poor me it's poor them because they are losing out on potential sales when the quality of the title is substandard on the PS3.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 7:27PM CaramelZappa said
Oh please, the PS3 port doesn't look that bad. I could see you not being interested in the game in general. (Especially if you're not into games like this and DMC) but if you WERE interested in the game and a few seconds of extra loading and a few shadows missing turned you off of it completely, that seems kind of petty. The 360 version may be "better" but there's nothing missing in the PS3 version that would stop you from enjoying it just as much.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:38PM (Unverified) said
She's taking the "pin" wheel to a whole new level.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 4:43PM Randallmcginness said
I stopped caring about this game once I realized that the ps3 version wasn't up to par w/ the 360 version. If I see the game for 20$ used some where, i'll buy it then but I won't support a game that the developers can't make equal on different platforms. Lazy.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:15PM Faceless Troll said
I stopped caring about people who say they don't care about this game after the 30th time. If you really don't care then how come you keep clicking on Bayonetta articles?
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:38PM Warlock said
Haha, no kidding. I don't get all this "Waaaah PS3 version sucks so I hate the game now and the devs are lazy!" talk. It's not like the PS3 version sends a guy over to your house to kick you in the groin. It looks slightly worse than the 360 version and load times are a bit longer, oh noes! Welcome to like every cross platform game everywhere. There are always going to be games that look better on one console over another.
Besides, it sounds like Sega wants to patch the game to fix those issues anyways.
Reply
Besides, it sounds like Sega wants to patch the game to fix those issues anyways.
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:16PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 8:42PM maveric101 said
protip: you can link to a specific time in youtube videos, note the end of the url:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzZaH-ACoIQ#t=0m50s
Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzZaH-ACoIQ#t=0m50s
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:17PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 5:56PM Machiavellian79 said
"Bayonetta is dead to me. Maybe if they didn't half ass the PS3 port I'd actually give a damn but at this point I'd be lying if I said this game actually meant something to me. I'd rather them just make it a 360 exclusive than release a substandard game on the PS3. Maybe if Sega / Platinum understood their audience (primarily on the PS3) they would have delayed the game and made improvements."
Or maybe if Sony didn't half ass and not provide support for developers like PG then you wouldn't have these inferior ports. Yeah, the finished product is so bad that it scored a few points below the 360. Have you even played the demo. Without playing the 360 version, I highly doubt you would be able to notice anything wrong with the game unless it was pointed out by a side by side comparison.
Also, the only reason you are acting like a tool over this game is that the 360 comes out on top. Well the 360 comes out on top on a hell of a lot of games but I am sure you played those games and happily didn't care.
In the end, the PS3 version has some problems but isn't the key is that the game plays great. Yes, the visuals are a touch off the 360 and there are a few extra seconds loading time. At least the game gives you something to do during those extra seconds so you might not even notice and if you are not playing the 360 version along with the PS3 version you also would not notice any difference.
Reply
Or maybe if Sony didn't half ass and not provide support for developers like PG then you wouldn't have these inferior ports. Yeah, the finished product is so bad that it scored a few points below the 360. Have you even played the demo. Without playing the 360 version, I highly doubt you would be able to notice anything wrong with the game unless it was pointed out by a side by side comparison.
Also, the only reason you are acting like a tool over this game is that the 360 comes out on top. Well the 360 comes out on top on a hell of a lot of games but I am sure you played those games and happily didn't care.
In the end, the PS3 version has some problems but isn't the key is that the game plays great. Yes, the visuals are a touch off the 360 and there are a few extra seconds loading time. At least the game gives you something to do during those extra seconds so you might not even notice and if you are not playing the 360 version along with the PS3 version you also would not notice any difference.
Posted: Nov 19th 2009 4:04PM (Unverified) said
Oh Bayonetta, you sick bitch, could you stick your high-heel in my arse?
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:29PM kentuckyfried said
I can't believe they put in a Chair of Torture (or at least something that looks like it). Way to bring in medieval torture devices into a video game. O_o
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments
