| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (31)

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 10:37AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Trials is at the top because we are all trying for the marathon achievement. 7 less faults... oy.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 10:40AM RocketAce150 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MW2's multiplayer is epic. I can't see it being knocked off the top spot anytime soon. Congrats to Infinity Ward for being responsible for 3 of the top 4 games on live.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:33AM NathanDTS said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I'm sorry but a multiplayer game were it takes 3 bullets to kill people isn't good.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:44AM mirage said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What are you talking about Nathan? I can't tell if you are upset because 3 bullets are too many or too few. I would think 3 well placed bullets should kill anyone in any game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:44AM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Treyarch is responsible for W@W.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 12:13PM NDrew2 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And IW is responsible for Treyarch's success.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 12:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm surprised that COD4 also beat Halo 3. Next weeks numbers will probably be MW2, and then Halo 3.

I also find it funny that the buggy mess that is Gears of War 2 has dropped so low.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 1:54PM ThePope said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Gears of war 2 isn't especially buggy anymore. It just lags like shit half the time because you get a host the other side of the world.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 3:25PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Dreaded Fear, MW2 beat out Halo 3 because, unlike Halo 3, MW2 is actually a good game. Also Halo 3 is much more buggy than GoW2, although that's just splitting hairs since both are a mess.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 10:47AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I can see CoD4....but W@W?? that was just horrible
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
W@W was not made by IF
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You just have a biased opinion towards cod4. W@w was good also.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:19AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this I know....
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:32AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I couldn't even finish the story on W@W.....the online was broken thanks to things like the damn dogs....and it was no improvement over CoD4 in ANY way...
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe you just sucked online. Dogs didnt ruin much for me. Cant say much about the single player story since i dont give a shit about it i mostly play online with my games.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:40AM Granger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Larger maps and second chance (seriously, why didn't IW borrow this or at least give us a better medic-like perk) were the only improvements it needed. Dogs aren't a problem if you play Search & Destroy, and at least they can be quelled more easily than a chopper. How can someone complain about dogs with MW2's absolutely ridiculous, guaranteed to get at least one kill, killstreaks is beyond me.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In my opinion, W@W's campaign was much better than cod4's, less linear, more freedom from waiting every two feet for someone to open a door for you, and I feel it was a much more diverse and interesting set of levels and objectives. I feel like Cod4 did a great job of holding your hand like a baby the entire play through, I never once felt like I controlled what to do or how to do it; that seems to be a step in the wrong direction for campaigns.

Just my opinion though.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:54AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sucked?? I wouldnt say that.....but I was nowhere near as good in that as say KZ2, Gears2, Uncharted2, or CoD4.....but I didn't suck....

hell I called the dogs in plenty of times...

and sadly you are one of MILLIONS that pay $60 for a game just for online....thereby allow Treyarch and other devs to get away with bullshit stories....

you will be one of the people THANKFUL when Activision releases a Online only CoD game for $60 and then charges a monthly fee for updates....you can have that.....a game is more than just online components to me


Granger the chopper isnt that bad if you know where to go to avoid it...certain walls can be shot thru but not all....the damn dogs pretty much went EVERYWHERE....and didn't show up on the map which the helicopter does
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:15AM Alex R said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still rocking the Gears 2, Despite what everyone says, it IS a good game, and now that everyone is on MW2, there are no whiny kids, no dicks and no 'kill stealing'.
Also, being in the UK, I always get good connections this way because apparently the French don't play MW.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:30AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Horde Mode is the best!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol when I was at future shop yesterday the guy in front of me was buying a new copy of world at war for 69.99

I couldn't belive it and maybe thought he grabbed the wrong game
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol What a dumbass. I got my copy a year ago new at best buy for 35$.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:32AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow he got raped....
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 11:36AM Granger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think CoD 4 will drop to the wayside here real soon, but W@W will probably stick around just because it is a different enough experience. The people that like their single shot rifles and Nazi Zombies will keep it popular enough.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 12:05PM CobraClutch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think these numbers will probably shift a little bit next week. Not everyone had MW2 last week. I pre-ordered (from Amazon) and didn't get release day shipping, so I didn't have the game til Saturday. In the meantime, I played COD4 in anticipation.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone else find that South Park game horrible?
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 2:15PM CrissCross87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So I wonder how Call of Duty Classic will do once its released to the public. Seemed pretty hard to get a match two nights after release. I guess why play with an old dog when you have three cuter puppies already available. But with the sales MW2 had and the online charts, I guess one might suggest that pretty much most xbox owners have at least one cod game in their collection
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 3:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OMG Halo is 3rd!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2009 6:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The numbers aren't vexing at all. They make perfect sense. People played CoD4 and World at War on Sunday and Monday as a way to prepare/warm-up for the upcoming release of MW2. If the activity list was based on time spent playing rather than UUs I am sure the list would have looked far different.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You don't know why people are still playing COD4 and WaW? Dude, Christmas presents.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW