| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (200)

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:04PM xyloPhipps said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Not a PS3 owner here. But for what it's worth... Considering how much it costs to own a PS3 vs. a 360 now, I could care less now than ever.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:49PM einhanderkiller said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*couldn't care less
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:03PM Brysonial the Bison said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I might be confused but aren't both systems farely priced now where i live you can get a xbox 360 pro for $200 and a ps3 for $300 and considering the ps3 comes with blu-ray thats a pretty good deal, but I guess even without blu-ray it would be decent deal. Also really, there is almost no difference and really does it matter if one is a tiny bit worse than they other?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:22PM Indefinite Implosion said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, it's great that companies are making both versions of games basically even overall, unlike the times of yore when we experience shitty ports...
But it's not worth it comparing graphics of Assassins Creed 2 because they're just not that good...
I might have thought they looked fine/good if I played it a month ago... but I've got and played Uncharted 2 since then and WOW! I didn't realise how much better (well I obviously realised how good it was, just not compared to some current gen. games) Uncharted 2 was, especially in the cut scene department after playing the first hour of so of AC2.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:16AM Triblade101 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Einhanderkiller
Actually he was right. "Couldn't care less" is a double negative, not and less. Anyways, for what it's worth I own a ps3 and a 360. I prefer the 360, but I will get a game on whichever system that the game is better on.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, it's not a double negative. Less is an amount, not a negative.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:42AM Courtney said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Cody, please refrain from commenting on grammar, it's clearly not your strong suit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:45AM EGOvoruhk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cody: How exactly is it a double negative? "Less" is being used to define the degree, or amount, of caring. He's not saying he can't care about it, he's saying he cares so little of it, any less and it would no longer classify as caring. Saying it's a double negative is like saying "I couldn't run further" is a double negative, or create your own "I couldn't VERB ADVERB"
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:47AM EGOvoruhk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Alex: Thanks for the quick putting-in-his-place. I sat here stunned for a few minutes before I could even bother to come up with a reply, haha
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:24AM Triblade101 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Actually grammar is one of my better suits, but in this instance I was wrong. Sorry about that. I was just relaying what my English teacher said one time. Evidently she was wrong.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:46AM Mirhderer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cody

I bet she's also the one who told you that grammar was one of your better suits
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:53AM Triblade101 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Calvin
I don't really care if you believe me or not. It doesn't matter to me what someone miles away from me thinks.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 2:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cody

Then why do you keep replying to him?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 2:38AM Garst said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Yeah, $300 now that they've gutted out the PS2 and Linux box.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 10:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@cody
No, it's COULDN'T CARE LESS.. americans always say "I could care less".. the whole point of the phrase is to say "I could not care any less then i already am", if you say "I could care less" you're saying "i am not caring as little as i could" lol.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 11:40AM arrrgh said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hate when people say "i could care less" .. bothers me just as much as when people say "same difference" instead of "same thing"

or "irregardless" instead of "regardless"

or "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes"



VERY VERY rarely are those often incorrect phrases actually and accurately what the people meant to say.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:08PM wellsley said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I could care less" CAN be used correctly. It's English, rules are meant to be bent and broken. Ask any English major. I'm not an English major. Now lets talk about proper use of end-sentence punctuation marks and quotations...everyone gets that wrong.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 12:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ arrrgh

you'd probalby appreciate this then :)

http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2003/11/10diclaudio.html
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 6:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ West:

No, you are clearly not an English major. "Could care less" indicates the possibility that the person could potentially have less interest in the subject/topic. If this was the case, then the intended exaggeration of the statement becomes defunct. "Couldn't care less" on the other hand implies that the person is incapable of caring any less about the subject/topic, which supports the intended exaggeration of the statement.

In my experience, I've only heard "could care less" used by Americans. I put this down to a mishearing of the world "couldn't" at some point in the past, but which has now unfortunately embedded itself into common linguistic usage in North America.

So yeah, I'd refrain from commenting on grammar if I were you, as this is not one of your rules "meant to be bent and broken."
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Im happy with my PS3
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:27PM Victoryismine52 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I find it wierd that all comparison's say they use the systems default settings because most casual consumers won't know to change thier settings to get a better picture.... but I don't know of any casual consumers that check comparison video's.... huh... anyone else find that strange..... I picked up my master assassin version monday night for my PS3 and I couldn't be happier, and I bought the first AC for my 360.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 7:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It's funny, because the PS3 version wouldnt look like that if they just went under display settings and turned RGB color to "Full." All the comparisons really aren't fair if they have the color at half for one console.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You'd think Sony would have learned from these comparisons and bump up the default contrast in the latest software upgrades.

Although, for gameplay I do like to have my contrast down a bit, so I can see people lurking in the shadows.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 11:55AM arrrgh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The comparisons aren't fair because they didn't change the ps3's default settings?

I thought the whole point of the comparisons was to run everything STOCK default settings.

Should they tweak every setting so that both look as similar as possible? Or does it make more sense to just use the default settings for BOTH systems and see how they go?

I'd tend to side with the latter for the sake of objectivity.

Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:06PM chromekreeper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i might be blind, but isnt the PS3 version brighter imo
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:20PM NickAVV said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It always is, it seems. Like the gamma difference between Windows and Mac.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The funny thing about brightness, and I know this is a new thing, is that you can adjust it.

ZOMGWTFBBQ!
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:50PM KungFuChaosNinja said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's not "brighter", that's "washed out".
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't say that's washed out. The contrast is lower, which makes the colors less saturated, but it can be compensated for with the tv settings. Washed out is an exaggeration.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:13PM DazGenetic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
CheesePirateAssassin: If by "Washed Out" you mean "Doesn't have crushed blacks.

There are some areas of that video where tons of texture detail is being lost to complete blackness on the 360. If that is the case, then no amount of TV adjustment will bring back the detail.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:37PM Victoryismine52 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you've seen any of the other comparison threads they use the default display settings for both systems. which causes some of this. Their view is that they want to compare an out of box experience and that most casual consumers won't know to change thier settings to best fit thier TV. However how many casual consumers do you know that watch comparison videos?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:06PM Typicalgamer said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
PENIS!!!! WHERE"S MY BETA CODE!!!

lol jk.

the ps3 version looks lighter, but the 360 version looks more detailed and smooth
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Even as a joke, the memories of the horrid garbage that came from that contest still haunt us today.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think people are barely crawling out of the woodwork again.

That was terrible.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:26PM nandokun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was unaware of the contest. For a good hour, I thought someone swapped Joystiq's comments with College Humor's comments.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:08PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've been in my anti-troll bunker for the past couple of hours. Is it safe to come out?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, the contest is over.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well...one has connections with Bloodlines. Depends on if you own a PSP, I suppose.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:14PM Typicalgamer said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
the psp version has around a 64 on metacritic...
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:29PM NumberZero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I got the PS3 version for the connection to Bloodlines due to the 5 exclusive weapons. Beat Bloodlines and I have all those weapons and I never have to get them again.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Really? People are still doing this shit?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I still smoke some crack in the evenings.





Wait.....what are we talking about?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:48PM Jack Tretton said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"People are still doing this shit?"

And blogs still run the shit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Comparison videos suck. If it's so minor, would it really make a difference when playing? I even hear at times that people won't even bother to buy a game when it's so different to the version of a system they don't own.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:12PM schopaia said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
This seems completely valid to me. It's meant to inform rather than offend.

I'm guessing you are a PS# owner?
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 10:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, my brother's got PS3, but he just hordes the damn thing to himself most of the time out of fear that I'll shiv it or something. Now before you call me a fanboy, know that I own a PS2, 360, and a DS Lite (see my name). I also recognize that the 360 is a damn good system, along with the Wii, and that the PS3 is harder to fit through than Hilary Clinton's vagina. Also, PSN needs more improvements. In my opinion, playing favorites sucks because you'll never get the it all. I could play some Uncharted, but I'll also want me some Madworld, Left 4 Dead or Crackdown. I'm just against foolish decisions like the one I mentioned earlier. But then again, I may be referring to fanboys.

I'm guessing you are a 360 owner?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:12AM mikec89 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
holding shift + a number doesn't capitalize it. fyi.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:07PM shadowhowl1900 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
its a great game no matter what console you own.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:08PM WiiFTW said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The PS3 version seems brighter, and the 360's background details seem a tad sharper. You're probably not going to notice the difference at full speed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2009 9:09PM nadomars said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
welp, my xbox just got banned from live. yes, I know, im a dirty pirate, vote me down...but honestly I don't understand why it's so bad to pirate music and movies and software, but as soon as its games everyone goes crazy. but anyways, I'm buying a PS3 now, so thanks microsoft! so it looks like im gonna go with the ps3 version, even though it technically might not be *as good*



cool story, bro.

thanks
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW