You don't see nearly the amount of coverage of Second Life (or as we call it in these parts, PlayStation Home's creepy, aggressively pornographic uncle) these days as you used to, and BBC did a little digging to find out why. Their discovery? Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but Second Life sucks. It's overly complicated to control, it's full of some truly horrific human beings, there are many better social networking hubs and (perhaps most importantly) companies that sunk a bunch of money into it rarely got their investments back.
What the BBC seems to be implying is that Second Life was largely a media-created phenomenon, with journalists and public figures so smitten by the idea of a virtual world, no one stopped to notice that it was a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
Besides, everybody knows that HiPiHi is where it's at.
Reader Comments (97)
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:00AM HighFiveJesus said
*shudders* Furries.
i hope they hacked or purchases those looks, no way should that be an option to have fur.
Reply
i hope they hacked or purchases those looks, no way should that be an option to have fur.
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:08AM (Unverified) said
What? Doesn't this.... squirrel... turn you on?
http://fursuit.timduru.org/dirlist/InTheNews/InnerFilth/article/images/cash-furry-art.gif
Reply
http://fursuit.timduru.org/dirlist/InTheNews/InnerFilth/article/images/cash-furry-art.gif
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:10AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
The body is nice... the head and tail are not.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:19AM HighFiveJesus said
No, i don't like to screw animals, not even animals in designer jeans and a six pack/ or double c's.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:41AM HighFiveJesus said
well i presume we aren't getting turned on just because having a stiffy is so much fun to walk around with.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 4:31AM WiredKnight said
Finding better furries is a lot like winning an argument on the internet...
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 8:16AM The Blank Mage Returns said
I'm not going to post NSFW links to deviantART, but I can assure you furries can be damn sexy. (When drawn by someone with talent, mind you.)
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 8:29AM The Blank Mage Returns said
Actually, just Felicia from Darkstalkers. Comon, guys, you know you'd hit that.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 10:51AM RKN said
The Japanese furry artist Dr. Comet brings out the furry in me. ; )
NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
http://img1.gelbooru.com//images/356/a28d5e04910ceb903ac97686c7b4173453b784e9.jpg
Reply
NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
http://img1.gelbooru.com//images/356/a28d5e04910ceb903ac97686c7b4173453b784e9.jpg
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:09PM HighFiveJesus said
Ok see they take a reasonably sexy female form, chop off the head and replace it with a mouse and add a tail. HOW IS THAT SEXY
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 2:41PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
@Blank Mage:
Felicia is mostly human, with SOME cat parts. Not furry. If anything, she's a catgirl.
Furry indicates that a character has very strong animal-like appearance. Completely covered in fur (or feathers, scales, etc.).
Reply
Felicia is mostly human, with SOME cat parts. Not furry. If anything, she's a catgirl.
Furry indicates that a character has very strong animal-like appearance. Completely covered in fur (or feathers, scales, etc.).
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 2:58PM The Blank Mage Returns said
Well, considering most furries are similar, but recolored, I fail to see the difference. Really, I'm just a fan of hot chicks, and furry artwork just seems to be of a higher quality overall.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:04AM (Unverified) said
"it's full of some truly horrific human beings"
I lol'd
Reply
I lol'd
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:09AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
I've been to 4chan... and lived. It truly is the cesspool of the Internet.
And, I've been informed from a quite reliable source that you fancy the Pocket Monster known as Mudkip. Is that accurate?
Reply
And, I've been informed from a quite reliable source that you fancy the Pocket Monster known as Mudkip. Is that accurate?
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:14AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
So, you are to say I've been misinformed?
Thou art mad?
Reply
Thou art mad?
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:15AM (Unverified) said
I don't plan to go to 4chan...Encyclopedia Dramatica is bad enough.
For my funnies, I stick with Uncyclopedia. At least they're funny without making it either about rape or related activities.
Reply
For my funnies, I stick with Uncyclopedia. At least they're funny without making it either about rape or related activities.
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:17AM (Unverified) said
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:21AM HighFiveJesus said
what do you expect, 4chan is all pedophiles that justify their masturbation over that hairless underdeveloped child body because someone had to draw it first, therefore is completely OK. No problems with these people's heads..
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:47AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
4chan is mostly trolls trolling trolls. Any actual pedos are banned on sight (the moderators, what few there are, do not allow child porn on the site).
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 4:10AM Giantenemycrab said
Take that back, Traceur. mudkips are awesome.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:02PM HighFiveJesus said
When everyone is anonoymous you can't really ban pedos can you? Sure they delete the pictures (after sharing the links with everybody in private).
Also isn't 4chan the place that finds the concept of a bear (typical 4chan user) molesting children to be HILARIOUS? No pedos indeed. ITS OK!
One thing for sure, it is 100 percent weeaboo there. Sad sad stuff.
Reply
Also isn't 4chan the place that finds the concept of a bear (typical 4chan user) molesting children to be HILARIOUS? No pedos indeed. ITS OK!
One thing for sure, it is 100 percent weeaboo there. Sad sad stuff.
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 3:07PM The Blank Mage Returns said
I remember seeing something about "Lolicons, Huzzah For Victimless Porn" or something. I loled at the time.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:07AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
I think the admirable thing about Second Life is how open-ended it is. You can, quite literally, do anything in it. You're able to upload your own textures, sounds, and animations to it, and it has its own scripting language.
But... that doesn't quite throw off how creepy some of the people are in it. I can't help but wonder if the people in that screenshot really are furries, or just trolls.
Reply
But... that doesn't quite throw off how creepy some of the people are in it. I can't help but wonder if the people in that screenshot really are furries, or just trolls.
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:55AM RogueJedi86 said
"You can, quite literally, do anything in it."
You can't attack people or engage in any sort of combat at all(like you can in all other MMOs). Be careful when you use the word "anything".
Reply
You can't attack people or engage in any sort of combat at all(like you can in all other MMOs). Be careful when you use the word "anything".
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 1:17AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
Well, Second Life isn't a game, it's a virtual world. It has no goals to achieve.
And from my understanding, there are actually areas in Second Life where you can, indeed, fight and even "die" (dunno how that works...).
Reply
And from my understanding, there are actually areas in Second Life where you can, indeed, fight and even "die" (dunno how that works...).
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 2:10AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
Uhh... what? The off-topic contest ended the other day, dood.
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 2:53AM (Unverified) said
@ Rogue Jedi
Yes, actually you can. There are a number of combat systems both finished and more advanced ones in development at the moment. :)
Reply
Yes, actually you can. There are a number of combat systems both finished and more advanced ones in development at the moment. :)
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:10AM (Unverified) said
Wow...I think I've seen better graphics on PS2 launch titles.
Reply
Posted: Nov 22nd 2009 5:03PM MickeyHusky said
Being a Second Life user myself, I can tell that that picture wasnt taken with the graphics settings set all the way on high, which is why they look a bit blocky.
Also they are made with the basic primative shapes that were avaliable at launch (2003), There have been many improvements made since then, with the introduction of 'sculpties' which let you make virtually any 3D shape you can think of.
You have to remeber that 99.9% of the things in SL are made by the public, and you have to make allowances that not everyone is a professional graphic artist.
Reply
Also they are made with the basic primative shapes that were avaliable at launch (2003), There have been many improvements made since then, with the introduction of 'sculpties' which let you make virtually any 3D shape you can think of.
You have to remeber that 99.9% of the things in SL are made by the public, and you have to make allowances that not everyone is a professional graphic artist.
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:29AM (Unverified) said
Hey, let's choose the worst-looking furries we can! People will -definitely- hate SL after this! :V
Reply
Posted: Nov 21st 2009 12:33AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
You say that as if there's such a thing as a good-looking furry. :V
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 218 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 152 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










