| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (18)

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's cool and all, but why do the buildings look like they are part of a Lego toy set?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't console RTS's suck in general? Why not just stick with the PC? I mean, I know they're probably going to do more than the usual copy/paste technique, but a lot of gamers steer clear of console RTS ports, unless they're built from the ground up FOR a console.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 2:56AM dandatrk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
even then its no good, i mean the best console RTS is Halo wars, that game sucked balls when you compare it to not even the best PC RTS's. consoles have proven to be able to play FPS's and so on with reletive success, but for an RTS you need the mouse and keyboard combo. not until touch screen become compatible wioth console will we see a good RTS on a console.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 3:56AM Granger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Have you been playing games this generation? Yeah, RTSs are still a long ways from perfect (and a long ways from performing as well as their PC counterparts) but, for the most part, RTSs on consoles have been pretty decent. They are at least playable now, and somewhat intuitive. They've definitely dropped the frustration a lot since StarCraft 64. Hell, Red Alert 3 may as well be a next generation game compared to Battle for Middle Earth II as far as the controls being vastly improved.

I've played through just about every RTS on 360 (save for End War and Stormrise). I know I'm not getting the full experience, but I enjoyed playing them for the most part (Supreme Commander was a glitchy mess on 360). Keep the console RTSs coming, they just keep getting better.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:18AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Ha, funny thing. I can run Crysis at an enjoyable level, but I've never been able to get Supreme Commander to run above 20fps. That game is so poorly optimized it makes me want to go and kick Chris Taylor in the head for wasting my money (and they wonder why we pirate games?)
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:28AM einhanderkiller said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's not so much poorly optimized as it is overly ambitious. You see, Supreme Commander simulates every single action in physics--there's no dice rolling with your hits. If you see that it hit, it hit; if you see that it missed, it missed. The problem is that when you have 500+ units on the field, all of them firing ballistics, you're simulating thousands of objects at once, plus each unit has its own individual AI. That was just too taxing for most 2007 hardware to handle.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 1:36AM OriginMarshal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't have a problem playing Supreme Commander, or Crysis on my machine. Ran fine, even when I was going all out, this is simply on a E8500 Wolfdale, and a GF260GTX V1.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 4:39AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ Einhander,

Yeah, I know all that. I can't get it to run over 20 FPS even when there's only like three buildings on the map. There's something sadly broken in that game.

Also, Total Annihilation did the same thing with physics-based projectiles, and it ran great back in the day.

@ Everyone else,

Why bury me down for? Because I mentioned piracy?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The processor is everything for this game. Going from a slow dual-core to quad was like night and day. But even a fast dual-core should be fine.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 6:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"Because I can't spell"...?

That's painful.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 2:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OMG! Q1 2010 must be the best Q1 in history of gaming. Seriously we are now looking forward to games like:

Mass Effect 2
Supreme Commander 2
Bioshock 2
C&C4
Aliens vs Predator
Splinter Cell Conviction
And more...

Man next year can't arrive soon enough.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 5:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah! Best year in gaming! Look at all those original games, new ideas and fresh approaches.... oh wait, i've already played all those games. Maybe i have a time machine in my brain....
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 6:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ t_m,

Says the guy with GLADOS as is avatar. You know portal was a spinoff of the Half-Life games, right? Innovation *can* happen inside established series, fyi.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 7:09AM Granger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I know is that list contains the sequel to the best RPG I've eve played AND Badass: The Game. Coupled with Lost Planet 2 and Dead Rising 2 and t_m can just GTFO.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 8:44AM Danthok said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow this game makes the first one look small and that is crazy!
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 9:29AM debosbike said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought I could get in before all the "RTS on consoles suxor" comments but teh trollz r fast. If someone wants to release a RTS on a console, let them. If it's inferior, don't buy it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 11:56AM shakeoctane said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. This looks really great! Possibly better than Starcraft 2? I guess we'll have to wait and see...
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2009 2:31PM GuyManDude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully they can tie in some intuitive controls for RTS games with Natal.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW