| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (36)

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:52PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Give it to me at a budget price and I'm down ... no more than $29.99 and I'll buy it assuming it's fun.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:53PM Sly C said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
so we're getting this but not battlefront 3? WTF?!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:54PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they know just how to cut to my core
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't they already announce it? And anyway they JUST announced this game, that doesn't mean they totally forgot about BF3 (Which is a must buy for me), they might just have another team working on it. 24 of Pandemic's staff was transfered, so maybe there is like, 12 on this game (with help from EALA) and 12 on BF3 (with help from EALA).
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:08PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if battlefront 3 had:

-32 OR 64 player online (doesn't matter which, both would be good)
-ground to air to space combat (fight anywhere you want)
-customization like renegade squadron (i thought it was cool)

then it would probably take me away from MW2, which is much easier said than done.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ben
Aren't you forget about the awesomeness that is VIVA FUCKING PINATA 3?!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:08PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and no, they didn't announce anything. a listing was on amazon for a while, but that's pretty much it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Sly
Oh, my mistake, so yeah, now I am pissed. I think I might take it out on my Cinnamonkey piƱata.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:25PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sly.... you, um.. you DO realize that EA doesn't own the rights to the Battlefront series, don't you? I just ask because I am wondering why EA would work on someone else's IP, an IP by the way that was last worked on by Rebellion (who for the record are not Pandemic and are not owned by EA)? Is this just the vogue thing on game blogs now, mentioning franchises developers no longer have any ties to when a franchise the developer in question does still have ties to is brought up?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:33PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AoE

I believe the long standing rumor was that Pandemic had taken the reigns of the SW Battlefront series from Rebellion.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3172336
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:59PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the rumor was that pandemic was in charge of BF3. that, and the BF games by pandemic were better than the rebellion ones.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:17PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i thought free radical had the BF3 rights along with rebellion, and then the rights went exclusively to rebellion after FR closed?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:20PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oh yeah, i remember the free radical one too. strange that the older pandemic one came to my mind before that...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 8:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ben, that makes 5 Battlefront games by Lucasarts. Talk about an egg heavy basket.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:01PM The Pirate said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
MW2 makes it 6 Call of duty games for Activison, Guitar hero van Halen makes it...9, 290 Guitar hero games for Activison
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah.. erm.. Good luck with that..
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:07PM No Kill Tayler said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
isn't*
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:08PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well you cared enough to comment soooooo....shut up?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:10PM Arsenic13 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
After the shittastic Mercenaries 2, I will never even consider playing another Mercs game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think it was that bad, I thought it was like GTAIV, but with cheats activated at all times.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:19PM Cheesus Crust said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a different game by a different developer. Considering the old dev was pandemic, this game can only be better
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:17PM BrentSchmidt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this based on that old MERCS game on Sega? If so... awesome. I friggin loved that game, especially the flame thrower weapon.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, its based off EA Mercenaries series,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercenaries:_Playground_of_Destruction
There yah go.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:28PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Brent Schmidt, I have EXCELLENT news for you, the Mercs you remember (aka Commando) actually did get an excellent sequel in 2008 in the form of Wolf of the Battlefield: Commando 3. It's, i think a $10 download title for XBLA & PSN. It's awesome, and has co-op. Here's the wikipedia entry for it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commando_3
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA, making properties off of dead franchises isn't the way to go back to profitability...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I guess you could call this one a Zombie.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:25PM HighFiveJesus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Needs to be very multiplayer oriented and possibly online or else the wii crowd will not care.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 4:26PM BoBsS said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I can't believe I bought Mercs 2 when it came out ... I loved the first one so much that my inner 5 year old douchebag wanted the game really badly ...

fucking eh man ... fucking eh....
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:51PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the first one was incredible, i beat that more times than any other game. There was nothing quite like flying in on a chopper, killing a bunch of guys, and then loading an HVT into your hummer for exfil. Man, what went wrong with the 2nd?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 9:40PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is the first one good? I t ried the demo to the second one, and hated just everything about it. Especially when I'd kill someone in a tank, take over it, then hop out. Turn the camera away from the tank then back to it and the tank is shooting at me.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 11:19PM Ice Cold said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
#1. Horrible hit detection hit boxes

#2. EA servers will have major Lag problems

#3. Go ahead buy a buggy game from a Studio that has been shutdown don't expect any patches

#4. Another example of EA buying a studio then ruining the IP like they did with Westwood and C&C and

#5. That game looks horrible

#6. Guy on foot with a hand gun survives a chopper shooting him wonderful

#7. $59.99 for that??? plus tax

#8. Need I remind the gaming community of our secret not so secret Embargo against EA IP's Its been 10 years plus and I have never purchased an EA game or given money to EA.

#9. Wait 2 months and Mercs Inc. will be $19.99 Bargain bin.

#10. During the launch window in 2010 there will be 3 other way superior games

Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:04PM Hooch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're a tool, that was a pre-development trailer, hence why it looked lacking in the graphixs department. Also, the game most likely would be supported with patches as the members of pandemic working on it have been employed by EA.

Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:04PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Our embargo? It seems like it's just you crazy man. EA's had some great IPs. Maybe if people bought more dead space, mirror's edge and the actual good games, there'd be less madden and less this. You reap what you sow. But seriously, horrible hit boxes? What the fuck? Is that suppoed to apply to every EA game ever?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 8:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looks fun, I'll play.

There are:
4 God of War games
9 Ratchet and Clank games
8 Battlefield games
5 Halo games
13 Mario games
14 Zelda games
etc...

Ask someone who enjoys those games if they care that there are a lot of sequels, and they will tell you to fuck off.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 9:36PM The Aquacharger said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
BULLSHIT to 14 marios! There's no way there's that few.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 6:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I think this game might have a chance, especailly since its by Pandemic(originally anyway) which, may I be the one to tell you, made a great series with Destroy All Humans 1, 2, and 3/4. My main complaint? It on Xbox/PS3. WHY IS EVERYONE FORGETTING ABOUT PC!!!!! Oh well, anyway my other complaint is that theres so many people complaining about graphics(and spelling it wrong half the time, wtf?) its a demo, stop complaining, besides in my veiw HL1 didnt have prahics like today and thats STILL an awesome game, along with CS 1.6. Hopefully EA wont f*** this game up like they did some others(however they do have some great titles).
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW