| Mail |
You might also like: WoW.com, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (142)

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:18PM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Is it so terrible that I didn't want to blow my cover, and just mowed down all the people I could in the airport scene? I was undercover, people!!!!

*Nurses gunshot wound from Kamarov*
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:31PM Johnny Locke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Best spelling.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:32PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like Modern Warfare 3 is about to have a "No Swiss" level.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:34PM Ridgecity said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Human rights??? it's called MODERN WARFARE for a reason! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

wait until they find out about the hidden upsidedown crucifix...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:32PM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoops, "Makarov". Gunshot wound gave me a mild case of dyslexia.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:53PM Iroquois said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funny thing is, in CoD4, there was a guy named Kamarov.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:59PM Cash9007 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually thought that whole level was boring as fake blood drying. In my second play through, I skipped it just to speed the damn thing. Being forced to slowly plod along all ominous-like probably sounded great in the planning meeting, but in reality, is just plain aggravating.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 7:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Cash

Way to be a little girl.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Seriously now... ITS A GAME.... PCness once again rears its head. Seems to me that Hollywood continues to get its free pass on the subject of violence as always.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:28PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't actually see the issue. If a child has misinformation on war crimes from video games I don't see the negative effect. I mean, sure, they should become educated, but I fail to see any real harm.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:29PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mmm, that was in reply to Shadowfax

You...you I agree with.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:05PM potato said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
REAL LIFE already allows people to violate the Geneva Convention - torture, illegal detention, failure to recognize POW status... and that's just violations by the USA, there are countries that do far worse.

Maybe games are just a reflection of real life - maybe we're not whitewashing things and pretending to live in a gumdrop fairyland where people are nice and war apparently has rules that people follow.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:24PM BigD145 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Health doesn't regenerate when you hide behind a box?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:35PM holyice7 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe this is just a super-sweet social commentary? "Let's throw out the rules to war, because if war exists only in stories, we won't need the rules!"

*starts putting flowers in shotgun barrels*
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:28PM Grey Acumen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dadito & Potato

You raise good points. If we're going to use this logic that video games affect how kids view reality then wouldn't it actually be more dangerous to NOT allow these actions? It would make these kids think that they could go out to war and shoot at mosks and churches without haven't to worry about damaging them at all.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 7:33PM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, it's a game. It's not like they were looking to ban the games. They just did a study.

And if "it's a game!" is an automatic pass in making things okay, why not put in child-rape games, or sim style game for concentration camps? Oh, wait, I know. We should make a game about flying planes into skyscrapers.

It's called some things are taboo and in poor taste. Even if it's "just a game".
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:21PM Gandalf the Grey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can actually understand this, if kids playing CoD come to think that its OK for an AC130 gunner to blow the shit out of everything because that's what war is like, there could be some problems there...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Luckily for us, they can't get into the military to actually use an AC130 with that attitude.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:37PM Johnny Locke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hold on, are you telling me every time a soldier gets 5 kills, they don't get awarded by a sentry gun?!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No but the UAV's at 3 are guaranteed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:16PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Really, because the military doesn't train the soldiers anything, just show up, grab a gun and do what games taught you. Is that what you really believe happens?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:32PM Rick James said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Just imagine what would happen if every soldier that got a 25 kill streak could do...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:48PM PeterPanana said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Shit, there is like 100 guys in that field in front of me, send in an air strike...wait, you mean I have to kill 5 of them before you will grant my request?!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:22PM DriveByLawsuit said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I find it ironic that it's always the Swiss that make these whole war crimes studies when they're one of the biggest arms exporters in the world...
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:53PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Swiss army knives?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:11PM Uphillbothways said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Prosthetic limbs?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:17PM Xemplar said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
cheese?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
watches?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:52PM KinseySS said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well since Geneva is in Switzerland, It still makes since they would do study's about the Geneva convention.

Odd ... I have a craving for a Toblerone now.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:51PM DangerMouse001 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Swatches?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:59PM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Slap Bracelets??
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:19PM Arcaria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Check your facts. Switzerland is #17 in the world for arms exports with $211m in sales in 2007. The US had over 7.5 billion in sales while the top 8 all cleared a billion. Switzerland isn't even close to being a top worldwide arms exporter. They're also currently in the middle of a vote to ban all arms exports.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Here's my source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:37PM Funkmaster General said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Arcaria

You ruined everyone's fun.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:49PM Arcaria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha yeah I know. It's just that I find it ironic when people try to make big statements like that but don't base it on, you know, actual facts.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:50PM DriveByLawsuit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Arcadia

Switzerland is still in the top 20 of arms exporters, so my statement that it's ONE of the biggest arms exporters is still accurate, never mind their development of weapons like the Carl Gustav SMG and recoil-less rifle, AT4, Bofors 40 mil, and that new automated artillery system they just invented.

My point is it's just ironic that they're home to the Geneva Conventions when they manufacture and sell some of the world's most predominant and effective weapons of war.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nobody said it, so I guess I will.

C-c-c-combo Breaker.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:46PM Arcaria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they had been number 21 you would have said "they're in the top 25. The fact is only 19 were ranked and they were 17. That's pretty low down the list. They're not one of the major players no matter how you try to look at it. Sorry dude.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:49PM DriveByLawsuit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You win this round Batman. But I'll be back.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They're fucking games.

Nobody in their right mind is going to think that games portray how real things happen. If they do, they need slapping.

I'm sick of hearing these types of stories, funny how you don't see them saying a similar thing about movies (Jarhead?).

/sigh.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:28PM kevin949 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wait, are you telling me that I can't get shot a dozen or more times and hide behind a wall and be fine after a few seconds?

I dunno, sounds like you're trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
'Fraid so chief.

Also means you can't collapse down to the ground after getting shot and slowly drag yourself away...take a breather and get abck in the saddle.

How reality sucks.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:19PM Xemplar said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
but, but.. what if we save our game first?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 5:06PM Alex R said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You can technically be killed twice if you eat a 1UP Mushroom, only found in the remote jumgles of Viet Nam.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:24PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Won't someone please think of the virtual children?!?!?!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So the geneva convention extends to fake, virtual people now?
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:07PM RobS the 3rd said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It would seems so, or it's the Swiss being wimps again. Damn neutral bastards.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:21PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If I don't survive, tell my wife hello.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:31PM The Wicker Man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boy oh boy, do we live in an age of self-serving scumbags. They spend money to do this stupid study and reap the awards of all the attention they will get. Games are such an easy target. Why don't they worry about the whole HUMANITARIAN thing and help real people. Swiss...*shakes head* BAD SWISS< NAUGHTY!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 1:44PM TheMainProtagonist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 6:13PM Manifest37 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Geneva Convention "Rules of War" only benefit one side: The side that doesn't use them.

When we meet our greatest adversary, these rules will be our undoing.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Disney Guilty Party review: Waggle, She Wrote

Posted on Sep 8th 2010 7:30PM

HAWX 2 review: The mild blue yonder

Posted on Sep 8th 2010 6:00PM

Engadget

WoW

Massively

Big Download

Autoblog

Urlesque

Games.com Blog

UGO.com